1,721,045 research outputs found

    High-Throughput Field Plant Phenotyping: A Self-Supervised Sequential CNN Method to Segment Overlapping Plants

    Get PDF
    High-throughput plant phenotyping—the use of imaging and remote sensing to record plant growth dynamics—is becoming more widely used. The first step in this process is typically plant segmentation, which requires a well-labeled training dataset to enable accurate segmentation of overlapping plants. However, preparing such training data is both time and labor intensive. To solve this problem, we propose a plant image processing pipeline using a self-supervised sequential convolutional neural network method for in-field phenotyping systems. This first step uses plant pixels from greenhouse images to segment nonoverlapping in-field plants in an early growth stage and then applies the segmentation results from those early-stage images as training data for the separation of plants at later growth stages. The proposed pipeline is efficient and self-supervising in the sense that no human-labeled data are needed. We then combine this approach with functional principal components analysis to reveal the relationship between the growth dynamics of plants and genotypes. We show that the proposed pipeline can accurately separate the pixels of foreground plants and estimate their heights when foreground and background plants overlap and can thus be used to efficiently assess the impact of treatments and genotypes on plant growth in a field environment by computer vision techniques. This approach should be useful for answering important scientific questions in the area of high-throughput phenotyping.This article is published as Guo Xingche Qiu Yumou Nettleton Dan Schnable Patrick S. High-Throughput Field Plant Phenotyping: A Self-Supervised Sequential CNN Method to Segment Overlapping Plants. Plant Phenomics. 2023:5;0052. DOI:10.34133/plantphenomics.0052.Copyright © 2023 Xingche Guo et al. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)

    Molecular analysis of meiotic recombination in maize

    Get PDF
    The 140 kb al-sh2 interval in maize was used as a model system to study meiotic recombination in plants. Two types of recombination events, i.e., crossover and gene conversion, were isolated and molecularly characterized. The sizes of gene conversion tracts characterized in this study range from 108 bp up to at least 16 kb. Two recombination hotspots were identified across this interval. One is located in the 5' end of the al coding sequence and the other in an apparent non-genic region. Both regions show a high level of DNA sequence similarity between the two chromosomes involved in meiotic recombination. In addition, it was shown that the regulatory transposon MuDR increases the rate of recombination at the al locus by a factor of three. However, the distribution of recombination breakpoints at this locus is not affected. A model is proposed in which the double-strand breaks that initiate recombination in the al gene cluster at its 5' end

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    MaizeEar-SAM: Zero-Shot Maize Ear Phenotyping

    No full text
    Quantifying the variation in yield component traits of maize (Zea mays L.), which together determine the overall productivity of this globally important crop, plays a critical role in plant genetics research, plant breeding, and the development of improved farming practices. Grain yield per acre is calculated by multiplying the number of plants per acre, ears per plant, number of kernels per ear, and the average kernel weight. The number of kernels per ear is determined by the number of kernel rows per ear multiplied by the number of kernels per row. Traditional manual methods for measuring these two traits are time-consuming, limiting large-scale data collection. Recent automation efforts using image processing and deep learning encounter challenges such as high annotation costs and uncertain generalizability. We tackle these issues by exploring Large Vision Models for zero-shot, annotation-free maize kernel segmentation. By using an open-source large vision model, the Segment Anything Model (SAM), we segment individual kernels in RGB images of maize ears and apply a graph-based algorithm to calculate the number of kernels per row. Our approach successfully identifies the number of kernels per row across a wide range of maize ears, showing the potential of zero-shot learning with foundation vision models combined with image processing techniques to improve automation and reduce subjectivity in agronomic data collection. All our code is open-sourced to make these affordable phenotyping methods accessible to everyone.This is a preprint from Zaremehrjerdi, Hossein, Lisa Coffey, Talukder Jubery, Huyu Liu, Jon Turkus, Kyle Linders, James C. Schnable, Patrick S. Schnable, and Baskar Ganapathysubramanian. "MaizeEar-SAM: Zero-Shot Maize Ear Phenotyping." arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13399 (2025). doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.13399

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore