1,721,037 research outputs found
Introduction
No full textSchiele Bernard. Introduction. In: Publics et Musées, n°9, 1996. Les dioramas (sous la direction de Bernard Schiele) pp. 10-14
Introduction
No full textSchiele Bernard. Introduction. In: Publics et Musées, n°9, 1996. Les dioramas (sous la direction de Bernard Schiele) pp. 10-14
Note sur la médiation muséale contemporaine
No full textSchiele Bernard, Boucher Louise. Note sur la médiation muséale contemporaine. In: Quaderni, n°46, Hiver 2001-2002. La Science dans la cité. pp. 27-51
Le message vulgarisateur
No full textSchiele Bernard, Larocque Gabriel. Le message vulgarisateur. In: Communications, 33, 1981. Apprendre des médias, sous la direction de Geneviève Jacquinot. pp. 165-183
Note de synthèse
No full textJacobi Daniel, Schiele Bernard, Cyr Marie-France. Note de synthèse. In: Revue française de pédagogie, volume 91, 1990. pp. 81-111
Introduction
No full textSchiele Bernard, Bélisle Claire. Introduction. In: Communication. Information Médias Théories, volume 6 n°2-3,1984. Les représentations. pp. 7-13
AI goes to the movies: fast, intermediate and slow common sense
No full textCommon sense is largely tackled within AI as a set of abilities to solve problems in everyday surprising situations. This approach reduces the historical dynamic governing its constitution and transformations. As a social representation, the taken-for-granted and pre-reflexive abilities are made conscious and become changeable. Common sense is a coherent and dynamic symbolic apparatus, coherent, because it presents regularities, and dynamic because these regularities are adaptive to changing contexts. Historical common sense should be characterised as a floating signifier, giving continuity in change, and a chronology with duration and rhythm at three levels of sedimentation: the first, fast cycle of opinion, provokes frequent adjustments over a single lifetime; the second, slower, acts upon structures, provoking at best one to two adjustments of attitudes over a single lifetime; the third, very slow, long precedes and long continues individual lifetimes as mentalities, and thus appears as an immutable bedrock of value and thematic convictions. By examining the challenges of common sense to AI, and vice versa, we can highlight the current transformations of common sense which are characterised by “presentism”, thus bearing witness to the recomposition of the modern sense of time and, therefore, of our common sense
When artificial intelligence meets common sense, frictions will arise
No full textWe introduce this book in three steps. Firstly, there is a history to the encounter between AI and common sense. Common sense was presented from the very beginning in the 1950s as a key challenge for AI. This asks for a clarification of how we can understand “common sense” and whether the operationalisation of common sense in designed AI is exhausting this semantic field. Secondly, we examine the usage of the term “common sense” as part of the English vocabulary. This shows four common uses, a deep ambiguity of the adjective “common”, which in many languages other than English requires two expressions, and a particular historical trajectory of the phase 'in English since the 18th century. Finally, we preview the chapters of this volume which are ordered into four sections examining the cycle of normalisation, assimilation and accommodation of AI and CS
- …
