1,721,269 research outputs found
Sensitive detection of organophosphates in river water by means of a piezoelectric biosensor
No full textA highly sensitive piezoelectric biosensor has been developed for detection of cholinesterase inhibitors. The inhibitor benzoylecgonine-1,8-diamino-3,4-dioxaoctane (BZE-DADOO) was immobilized on a monolayer of 11- mercaptomonoundecanoic acid (MUA) self-assembled on the gold surface of the sensor. The binding of high-molecular-weight cholinesterase to the immobilized cocaine derivative was monitored with a mass sensitive piezoelectric quartz crystal (quartz crystal nanobalance; QCN). In the presence of an inhibiting substance in the sample, the binding of cholinesterase to the immobilized inhibitor was reduced. The decrease of the rate of mass change was proportional to the concentration of free inhibitor in the sample. This way the affinity sensor followed anti-cholinesterase toxicity and the enzyme activity of ChE was not addressed. A assay for detection of organophosphates (OP) was optimized. Regeneration of the sensor surface was achieved with 1 mol L-1 formic acid, which enabled 40 measurements with one sensor. All assays were carried out in a flow-through arrangement. The total measurement time (binding + regeneration) was 25 min and the detection limit for different OP (paraoxon, diisopropylfluorophosphate, chlorpyriphos, and chlorfenvinphos) was down to 10(-10) mol L-1 (0.02 mu g L-1). This sensor was used for determination of organophosphate (diisopropylfluorophosphate) levels in river water sample
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
