1,721,185 research outputs found
The Modern Doctor: Unraveling the Practices of Residency Training Reform
Scheele, F. [Promotor]Meurs, P.L. [Promotor]Bont, A. de [Copromotor
Assessment to optimise postgraduate medical training
Scheele, F. [Promotor]Braat, D.D.M. [Promotor]Schuwirth, L.W.T. [Promotor
The clinical learning climate
Scheele, F. [Promotor]Vleuten, C.P.M. [Promotor]van der Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. [Promotor
Mind the gap; the transition to hospital consultant
Scheele, F. [Promotor]Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. [Promotor]Teunissen, P.W. [Copromotor]Siegert, C.E.H. [Copromotor
Tailoring CanMEDS for training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the Netherlands
Scheele, F. [Promotor]Vleuten, C.P.M. van der [Promotor]Driessen, E.W. [Copromotor
Unravelling learning by doing
Scheele, F. [Promotor]Vleuten, C.P.M. [Promotor]van der Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. [Promotor
The future is almost there: Attitudes of medical students towards medicine for older people and their motives for future career choice
Scheele, F. [Promotor]Hertogh, C.M.P.M. [Promotor]Vries, H. de [Copromotor
Minimally Invasive Surgical skills training, Learning, Assessment & validation
Bonjer, H.J. [Promotor]Scheele, F. [Promotor]Meijerink, W.J.H.J. [Copromotor]Huirne, J.A.F. [Copromotor
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
