1,721,185 research outputs found

    The Modern Doctor: Unraveling the Practices of Residency Training Reform

    Full text link
    Scheele, F. [Promotor]Meurs, P.L. [Promotor]Bont, A. de [Copromotor

    Assessment to optimise postgraduate medical training

    Full text link
    Scheele, F. [Promotor]Braat, D.D.M. [Promotor]Schuwirth, L.W.T. [Promotor

    The clinical learning climate

    Full text link
    Scheele, F. [Promotor]Vleuten, C.P.M. [Promotor]van der Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. [Promotor

    Mind the gap; the transition to hospital consultant

    Full text link
    Scheele, F. [Promotor]Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. [Promotor]Teunissen, P.W. [Copromotor]Siegert, C.E.H. [Copromotor

    Tailoring CanMEDS for training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the Netherlands

    Full text link
    Scheele, F. [Promotor]Vleuten, C.P.M. van der [Promotor]Driessen, E.W. [Copromotor

    Unravelling learning by doing

    Full text link
    Scheele, F. [Promotor]Vleuten, C.P.M. [Promotor]van der Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. [Promotor

    The future is almost there: Attitudes of medical students towards medicine for older people and their motives for future career choice

    Full text link
    Scheele, F. [Promotor]Hertogh, C.M.P.M. [Promotor]Vries, H. de [Copromotor

    Minimally Invasive Surgical skills training, Learning, Assessment & validation

    Full text link
    Bonjer, H.J. [Promotor]Scheele, F. [Promotor]Meijerink, W.J.H.J. [Copromotor]Huirne, J.A.F. [Copromotor

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore