1,721,001 research outputs found
Comprehensive meta-analysis of radial vs femoral approach in primary angioplasty for STEMI
Item does not contain fulltextINTRODUCTION: Primary angioplasty has improved survival as compared to thrormbolysis. However, bleeding complications still represent the Achille's heel, mainly related to access site. Although the radial approach is getting larger consensus for elective percutaneous procedures, its safety and advantages in the setting of ST-segment elevation (STEMI) is controversial. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized and non randomized trials comparing radial vs transfemoral approach in primary angioplasty for STEMI. METHODS: The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Pubmed) from January 1990 to October 2012. No language restrictions were enforced. RESULTS: A total of 27 trials were finally included, with 29,194 patients (4685 enrolled in 11 randomized trials and 24,509 in 15 non randomized trials). A total of 10,052 patients underwent radial approach and 19,142 patients underwent femoral approach. A total of 2499 patients (8.6%) had died at follow-up. Radial approach was associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality (5.2% vs 10.3%, OR [95% CI]=0.55 [0.40, 0.76], p<0.001, p het=0.97) (primary endpoint). Significant benefits were observed in both randomized (2.7% vs 4.7%, OR [95% CI]=0.55 [0.40, 0.76], p<0.001, p het=0.97) and observational studies (5.9% vs 11.1%, OR [95% CI]=0.48 [0.43, 0.54, p<0.001, p het=0.44]). Major bleeding complications were observed in a total of 808 patients (2.8%). Radial approach was associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding complications as compared to femoral approach (1.9% vs 4.7%, OR [95% CI]=0.38 [0.31, 0.47], p<0.0001, p het=0.17), similarly in both randomized (2.7% vs 5%, OR [95% CI]=0.51 [0.37, 0.70], p<0.001, p het=0.87) and observational studies (1.4% vs 4.6%, OR [95% CI]=0.32 [0.25, 0.42], p<0.0001, p het=0.32). Both benefits in death and major bleeding complications were not related to baseline risk profile. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials showed that among STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty the radial approach is associated with a consistent reduction in mortality and major bleeding complications and. Therefore, routine use of radial approach should be strongly encouraged in primary angioplasty
Impact of red blood cells count on the relationship between high density lipoproteins and the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease: a single centre study [corrected]
We have hypothesized that high red blood cells (RBC) count can potentially play an atheroprotective role in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. We, therefore, have investigated the relationship between high density lipoproteins cholesterol (HDL-C) and RBC levels in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of mortality. Impaired lipid profile represents a major risk factor for atherosclerosis. High density lipoprotein (HDL) is a key factor in atherosclerosis disease development. RBC can mimic HDL's reverse cholesterol transportation with a potential atheroprotective role. Coronary angiography has been evaluated in 3,534 patients. Fasting samples were collected for haematology and lipids levels assessment. Coronary disease was defined for at least 1 vessel stenosis >50 %. Patients were divided according to HDL-C and RBC tertiles. Lower HDL-C was significantly associated to the prevalence of CAD (84.8 vs 78.5 vs 67.3 %, p ≤ 0.001; adjusted OR [95 % CI] = 1.55 [1.3-1.8], p < 0.001) and severe CAD (30 % vs 30 % vs 24.4 %, p = 0.002; adjusted OR [95 % CI] = 1.08 [1.01-1.16], p = 0.02), this relationship was maintained even dividing our population according to RBC tertiles (p < 0.001).In conclusion, HDL-C levels are directly related to RBC count and inversely to the prevalence and extent of coronary disease. Higher RBC levels can reduce the risk of CAD in patients with lower HDL-C levels, suggesting an important atheroprotective role
High-Density Lipoproteins and Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Study
Our goal was to estimate the role of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in predicting the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 3280 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Predictors of lower HDL levels (<32 mg/dL) were male gender (P < .001), diabetes mellitus (P = .03), renal failure (P = .01), higher low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol (P < .001, respectively), triglycerides (P < .001), and white blood cells (P < .001), aging (P < .001), previous myocardial infarction (P = .02) and hemoglobin (P < .001), treatment with angiotensin-receptor blockers (P < .001), and statins (P = .002). The HDL-C levels were significantly inversely associated with prevalence of CAD (P < .001, adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval, CI] = 1.35 [1.25-1.45], P < .001), and HDL-C <44 mg/dL was best the predictive value of the risk of CAD, (adjusted OR [95%CI] = 1.61 [1.24-2.1], P < .001). We found significant association between HDL-C and the risk of CAD; a value <44 mg/dL was the best cutoff in the prediction of CAD
Impact of renal function on mean platelet volume and its relationship with coronary artery disease: A single-centre cohort study
Mean platelet volume (MPV) has been proposed as a marker of platelet reactivity and cardiovascular disease. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly favors the occurrence of cardiovascular events, by increasing the circulating levels of a wide spectrum of pro-oxidant and pro-thrombotic mediators. However, opposite alterations of platelet function, both enhanced aggregability and increased bleeding diathesis have been reported in these patients, with contrasting results on the effects of renal function on MPV and coronary artery disease, that were assessed in present study
Vitamin D status, diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography
Growing attention has been addressed to the cardiovascular effects of vitamin D, in order to prevent the vascular wall degeneration and the progression of atherosclerosis. Diabetes mellitus is an established risk factor for coronary artery disease, where the enhanced pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic status could render even more important the athero-protective effects of vitamin D. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of diabetes on vitamin D levels and its relationship with the extent of CAD
Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Combination between mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width to predict the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease: results from a large cohort study
Acetylsalicylic acid desensitization in patients with coronary artery disease: A comprehensive overview of currently available protocols
Risk and Benefits of Triple Therapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation Requiring Oral Anticoagulation: A Meta-Analysis of 16 Studies
Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Patients with coronary artery disease who undergo stent implantation and have concomitant indication for long-term oral anticoagulation represent a considerable proportion of the overall population. To date there is still no consensus about the optimal antithrombotic strategy to choose in this kind of patients, due to the difficult balance between an increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the risk and benefits of triple antithrombotic therapy versus dual antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation, requiring long-term oral anticoagulation. METHODS: We performed formal searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and major international scientific session abstracts from January 1990 to September 2015 regarding the use of triple antithrombotic therapy (TT) versus dual therapy (DT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation that required chronic oral anticoagulation. Data regarding study design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of patients, and selected endpoints was extracted by 2 investigators. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Sixteen trials with a total of 21716 patients undergoing coronary stent implantation with indication to long term oral anticoagulation, were finally included. A total of 6950 received TT, whereas 14766 received DT alone. The follow-up period ranged from 180 to 730 days. Data regarding mortality were available in 21658 patients (99.7 %). All cause mortality was observed in 10.4 % patients in TT versus 16.3 % in DT (OR [95 % CI] =0.73 [0.66-0.80], p <0.001; p het <0.001). In addition, TT was associated with a reduced incidence of MI (6.4 versus 9.8 %, OR [95 % CI] = 0.74 [0.65-0.84], p < 0.001; phet < 0.001) and ischemic stroke (1.8 versus 3.9 %, OR [95 % CI] = 0.55 [0.45-0.68], p < 0.001; p het = 0.07). As expected, TT was associated with a significant increase in major bleeding events (10.8 versus 8.5 %, OR [95 % CI] = 1.38 [1.25-1.53], p < 0.001; p het = 0.02). By meta regression analysis we found that benefits in mortality with TT were inversely related with the risk of bleedings (beta [95 % CI] = 2.25 (1.55; 2.95), p < 0.00001). The benefits with TT regarding overall mortality, recurrent MI and ischemic stroke were also confirmed in a pre-specified analysis versus DAPT or oral anticoagulation in association with a single antiplatelet agent. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that among patients undergoing coronary stent implantation, requiring chronic OAC, the use of a TT is associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality, recurrent MI and ischemic stroke. As expected, we found a higher incidence of bleedings in patients treated with triple therapy. The benefits in mortality were lost in patients at high-risk for bleedings
- …
