112,007 research outputs found
Scaria laeta Gunther 1940
No full text<i>Scaria laeta</i> Günther, 1940 stat. resurr. <p>Figs. 8, 9, 31</p> <p> <i>Scaria laeta</i> Günther, 1940: 472. Synonymized under <i>Scaria ferruginea</i> Hancock, 1909 by Cadena-Castañeda & Cardona (2015: 458).</p> <p> <b>Type specimens.</b> Lectotype (here designated): ♂ <b>BRAZIL</b>, Amazonas, Sao Pablo de Olivença (Sao Pablo de Olivença am Südufer des oberen Amazonas), S. & I. Waehner; 01.01.1932 – 31.12.1938; labeled as <i>Scaria waehneri</i> <b>n. sp.</b> (K. Günther det. Cotypus), DORSA D069XM01 (SMTD). Paralectotypes (here designated): 3♂ same data as lec- totype, DORSA D069XM02, DORSA D069XM03, DORSA D069XM04. 1♀ <b>BRAZIL</b>, Mündung des Rio Javary, an der brasilianisch-peruanischen Grenze labeled Scaria waehneri <b>n. sp.</b> S. & I. Waehner; 01.01.1932 – 31.12.1938; labeled as <i>Scaria waehneri</i> <b>n. sp.</b> (K. Günther det. Cotypus) DORSA D069XF01 (SMTD).</p> <p> <b>Other specimens examined.</b> <b>BRAZIL</b>, Amazonas, Ipixuna, Rio Gregório, Comunidade Lago Grande, 07°10’11.7”S– 70°49’10.3”W, 21.v.2011, 01:00–04:00h, Light trap in the canopy, J.A. Rafael, J.T. Câmara, R.F. Silva, A. Somavilla, C. Gonçalves, A. Agudelo <i>leg</i>. (1♀); <i>idem</i>, 20–21.v.2011, 20:00–01:00h (1♂) (INPA). Brazil, Amazonas, Manacapuru, III-1926, (1♂ 2♀). Amazonas, Below Codajaz, Rio Solimoes, IX-5-1920, (12♂ 17♀); Amazonas, Rio Ica-Putumaya, VIII-30 to IX-2-1920, (1♀) (ANSP); Amazonas, Aray to Manaos, Amazon River, IX- 20, 21 -1930, 1 female (USNM). <b>PERU</b>, Loreto, Iquitos, III-7-1925, (2♂ 1♀) (AMNH and ANSP); Loreto, middle Rio Ucayali, X-15-1923, (5♂ 9♀) (AMNH and ANSP), Loreto Rio Ucayali, VIII-10-1923, (2♂) (AMNH); Loreto, Rio Maranon, VII-7-1920, (3♂ 2♀) (ANSP). <b>COLOMBIA</b>, Amazonas, PNN Amacayacu (CAUD) (Cadena-Castañeda & Cardona, 2015).</p> <p> <b>Redescription. Male.</b> Pronotum and legs brown; face, lower margin of lateral lobes of pronotum, thoracic and abdominal sternites yellow-greenish; post-ocular stripe, most of the dorsal part of abdominal tergites and hind wings black (Fig. 8A); tegmina black with a broad, light colored stripe covering at least half the ventral edge, and a large ellipsoidal subapical spot (Fig. 8C). Head. Stout, eyes moderately globose (Fig. 8B), fastigium of the vertex prolonging in the middle of the eyes in side view and truncated at the tip, much below the dorsal surface of the eyes (Fig. 8C), frontal costa short and very narrow scutellum, directed back from the fastigium; lateral carinae arising at the level of the fastigium, flared between paired ocelli and antennal grooves (Fig. 8b). Pronotum, extending noticeably into the abdomen, being twice as long as the thorax and abdomen put together (Figs. 8A,D); anterior spine slender, short and decurved forward (Fig. 8C); mid line of the pronotal disc moderately elevated in the middle of the pronotum and moderately undulated at the level of the mesothorax (Fig. 8D); lateral lobes of the pronotum wider than long, lateral shoulder carina notoriously long and rounded, with the lower margin converging in a triangular, non-acute angle; hind stripe of the lateral lobes of the pronotum present in the first basal two-thirds, not reaching thr lateral shoulder carina (Fig. 8C). Tegmina lance-shaped and elongated, hind wings overcoming the tip of the pronotum noticeably. Legs slender, fore femora without an apical spine, midfemora with a small, internal, dorso-apical spine, hind femur with a poorly developed pregenicular spine, this sometimes absent. Abdomen. Subgenital plate short and narrow, non-cupuliform, narrowing distally (Fig. 8E), without a mid-longitudinal carina, penultimate sternite broadly and deeply notched on mid-apical edge (Fig. 8F), stout cerci (much stouter than other species of the genus) and cylindrical (Fig. 8F), epiproct short and as long as wide.</p> <p> <b>Female.</b> Similar in color and build to the male, with no variation worth noting related to sex except of course for the terminalia (Figs. 9 A–D). Subgenital plate wider than long, with a very low, arcuate, median lobe, with no lateral prolongations (Fig. 9E); ovipositor very short and stout compared with other species of the genus; cerci quite stout and cylindrical (Fig. 9F).</p> <p> <b>Variations.</b> The apical spine of the mid femora varies from obsolete to moderately well developed.</p> <p> <b>Measurements:</b> CFP: 14,9-13,7; VE: 1,1-0,8; HE: 1-0,9; VW: 1,4-0,8; PL: 13,7-11,9; PLB: 2,4-1,9; FF: 3,2- 2,7; FL: 2,9-2,4; MFL: 2,9-2,8; MTL: 2,-–2,2; HL: 7,3-5,6; HW: 1,9-1,5; HL: 5,6-4,6.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Amazonia of Colombia, Brazil and Peru.</p> <p> <b>Comments.</b> Data from ANSP and AMNH are from Grant, 1962. The validity of the species is reinstated after it was synonymized by Cadena-Castañeda & Cardona (2015) under <i>S. ferruginea</i>. Lectotype and paralectotypes are proposed according to the outline from Article 74 (ICZN: International Code of Zoological Nomenclature).</p>Published as part of <i>Cadena-Castañeda, Oscar J., Mendes, Diego Matheus De Mello, Silva, Daniela Santos Martins, Granda, Juan Manuel Cardona, García, Alexander García & Tumbrinck, Josef, 2019, Systematics and biogeography of the genus Scaria Bolívar, 1887 (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae: Batrachideinae), pp. 1-65 in Zootaxa 4675 (1)</i> on pages 19-22, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4675.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/3465115">http://zenodo.org/record/3465115</a>
Scaria ferruginea Hancock 1909
No full text<i>Scaria ferruginea</i> Hancock, 1909 <p>Figs. 18, 19, 35</p> <p> <i>Scaria ferruginea</i> Hancock, 1909: 425.</p> <p> <i>Scaria laeta</i> Günther, 1940: 472. Synonymized by Cadena-Castañeda & Cardona (2015: 458).</p> <p> <b>Type speciments.</b> Holotype: ♀ <b>BRAZIL</b>, S. America, collected by Bates; W.W. Saunders’ collection (UMO).</p> <p> <b>Other specimens examined.</b> <b>BRAZIL</b>, Rondônia, Candeias, Jamari, UHE Samuel, 17.viii.2016, 8°56’57”S– 63°10’60”W, Arm. Luz, D.M.M. Mendes, F.F. Xavier F °, A.A. Agudelo & J.A. Rafael <i>leg</i>. (1♀); <i>idem</i>, Amazonas, Careiro Castanho, BR-319, km 181, Sítio São Paulo, 4°12’48”S– 60°49’04”W, 10–24.iv.2017, Malaise grande, J.A. Rafael & F.F. Xavier F° <i>leg</i>. (1♀); <i>idem</i>, 15–28.ii.2017 (1♂); <i>idem</i>, 05–17.x.2017 (1♀); <i>idem</i>, Amazonas, Barcelos, Rio Padauari, Comunidade Ararinha, 00°30'18"N – 64°03'30"W, 04–08.vi.2010, Varredura, S.S. Oliveira, J.T. Câ- mara, J.A. Rafael & V. Linardi <i>leg</i>. (1♂ 1♀) (INPA). Para, Para, V. VII, VII-21-1919, (5♀); Para, Peixe Boi, XI-XII- 1907 (1♀), Para, Prata VII-9-1919 (1♀); Pará, Satarém, (1♂), Amazonas, Tefé, I-28, XII-5-1920 (1♂ 1♀) (ANSP). <b>BOLIVIA</b>, Santa Cruz, Palmar, Rio San Mateo, IX-14–16-1937 (3♀), La Paz, Mapiri (2♂ 2♀) (ANSP). <b>PERU</b>, Loreto, Iquitos, V-3, 17 -1920, (2♀); Loreto, Pachitea (1♂); Huanuco, Tingo María, II-1950 (1♂ 1♀) (ANSP) <b>CO- LOMBIA,</b> Putumayo, la Hormiga (CAUD).</p> <p> <b>Photographic records.</b> <b>BOLIVIA</b>, PN Madidi (Arthur Anker) (1♀). <b>COLOMBIA</b>, Vaupes, Mitu, 1°16’1.21”N, 70°13’10.77”O (Juan Manuel Cardona) (1♀).</p> <p> <b>Redescription. Female.</b> Pronotum, tegmina, wings and thoracic sternites brownish black, tegmina with a subapical ovoid, yellowish spot; dorsal midline brownish white as are the legs and head. Postocular strip usually lacking (in a few specimens there was a faint hint of a line); lower half of the lateral lobes of the pronotum and the greater part of the abdomen whitish (Fig. 18A). Head, stout and moderately elongated, eyes globose and moderately long (Fig. 18B); fastigium of vertex rounded and poorly projected, frontal costa lowly, but evenly arcuate in lateral view, reaching near the middle of the face; narrow scutellum; dorsal carina arising at about the level of fastigium, short usually sloping obliquely ventrad as part of the outline of the whole structure (Fig. 18C). Pronotum, flat, extending a little longer than hind femora (Fig. 18A), anterior spine of pronotum stout, curving gradually towards the front, covering the vertex in part. (Fig. 18C); median carina continuous and slightly raised from anterior spine to pronotal tip, this carinae pigmented by a brown whitish line (Fig. 18D); lateral lobes of the pronotum wider than long, lateral shoulder carina rounded and poorly projected; posterior margin of the lateral lobe sharped (Fig. 18C). Tegmina with a prominent subapical ovoid spot, this usually light yellow or white, tegmina ovoid and short compared to other species of the genus, covering the base of the first abdominal tergite (Fig. 18C). Legs short and slender, fore femora with a weak sulcation above for its entire length, mid femora with a well-developed to strongly developed internal, dorso-apical spine; hind femora with a pre-genicular spine developed. Abdomen. Subgenital plate a little longer than wide (Fig. 18F), with a roundish mid-indentation with no additional protrusions; ovipositor 1.5 times as long as subgenital plate (Fig. 18E), epiproct long and triangular shaped; cerci conical and tapering gradually to the tip (Fig. 18G).</p> <p> <b> Male (<i>novum</i>).</b> Similar to the female in color and structure of body but differs in the ambisexual characters (Figs. 19 A–D): subgenital plate moderately short and inflated (Figs. 19 E–F), epiproct subtriangular with a small distal protrusion (Fig. 19E); cerci cylindrical and tapering progressively towards the tip. (Fig. 19G); penultimate abdominal sternite with a weak medial protrusion (Fig. 19F).</p> <p> <b>Variation.</b> Post-ocular stripe usually lacking, though it can occur, weakly and indistinctly, in some specimens; mid-longitudinal stripe of light brown, tan or cream color; tegmina rarely with a basal, light yellowish spot.</p> <p> <b>Measurements:</b> CFP: 13,4-13,1; VE: 1,1-0,8; HE: 1-0,9; VW: 1,4-0,8; PL: 12,6-12,4; PLB: 3-2,6; FF: 3,7-3,3; FL: 2,7-2,6; MFL: 3,9-3,6; MTL: 3,1-2,9; HL: 8-7,4; HW: 2,5-2,1; HL: 6,6-6.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Widely distributed in the Amazon and the Andean piedmont of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil and Bolivia.</p> <p> <b>Comments.</b> This species was synonymized under <i>S. lineata</i> by Grant, 1902; and under <i>S. laeta</i> by Cadena- Castañeda & Cardona, 2015; we hereby revalidate its status and a re-description is provided for its accurate determination. Because <i>S. ferruginea</i> has a distinct dorsal line, it was mistaken in the past with <i>S. lineata</i> (Westerdujin & Cadena-Castañeda, 2014; Huamán <i>et al</i>, 2014), from which it differs by color pattern (in this species the usual color is dark brown) the post-ocular stripe is usually lacking, and the ovipositor differs (very short in <i>S. ferruginea</i> and normal-sized in <i>S. lineata</i>). Also, tegmina spot is lacking in <i>S. lineata</i> but conspicuous in <i>S. ferruginea</i>.</p>Published as part of <i>Cadena-Castañeda, Oscar J., Mendes, Diego Matheus De Mello, Silva, Daniela Santos Martins, Granda, Juan Manuel Cardona, García, Alexander García & Tumbrinck, Josef, 2019, Systematics and biogeography of the genus Scaria Bolívar, 1887 (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae: Batrachideinae), pp. 1-65 in Zootaxa 4675 (1)</i> on pages 33-36, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4675.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/3465115">http://zenodo.org/record/3465115</a>
author-bios-SRD-19-0063.R1 – Supplemental material for The Network Structure of Police Misconduct
No full textSupplemental material, author-bios-SRD-19-0063.R1 for The Network Structure of Police Misconduct by George Wood, Daria Roithmayr and Andrew V. Papachristos in Socius</p
Association between serum alkaline phosphatase and resistance to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in chronic kidney disease: a post-hoc analysis of the HERO trial
No full textAbstract not availableDW Johnson, E Pascoe, SV Badve, K Dalziel, A Cass, P Clarke, P Ferrari, SP Mcdonald, AT Morrish, E Pedagogos, V Perkovic, A Scaria, R Walker, LA Vergara, CM Hawle
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Scaria hamata De Geer 1773
No full textScaria hamata (De Geer, 1773) Figs. 20, 21, 36 Acrydium hamatum De Geer, 1773: 503. Scaria hamata: Bolívar, 1887: 301. Type speciment. Neotype (here designated): ♂ BRAZIL, Amazonas, Campus universitário da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), 03.ii.1979, J.A. Rafael leg (INPA). Other specimens examined. BRAZIL, Amazonas, Manaus, Campus universitário, 03.ii.1979, J.A. Rafael leg. (2♀ 1♂); idem, 28.viii.1979 (1♂); idem, 18.xi.1978 (1♂); idem, 07.x.1978 (8♀ and 2♂); idem, 07.vii.1979 (1♂ 1♀); idem, 07.iv.1979 (1♂); idem, 02.ix.1978 (1♀); idem, 06.i.1979 (5♀ and 1♂); idem, 30.ix.1978 (2♀ and 1♂); idem, 04.xiii.1979 (1♀); idem, 08.ix.1979 (2♀ and 1♂); idem, 07.x.1978 (2♀); idem, 17.iii.1979 (1♀); idem, 12.v.1979 (1♀); idem, 03.ii.1979 (1♂); idem, 04.xii.1979 (1♂); idem, 20.i.1979 (1♀); idem, 21.vii.1979 (1♀); idem, 17.ii.1979 (2♀); idem, 24.ii.1979 (3♂ and 2♀); idem, 27.i.1979 (2♂ 1♀); idem, 24.iii.1979 (1♀); idem, 23.vi.1979 (1♂); idem, 21.xii.1978 (1♀); idem, 23.ix.1978 (3♀); idem, 09.ix.1978 (1♂); idem, 10.ii.1979 (1♀); idem, 13.i.1979 (1♀); idem, 31.viii.1979 (2♀); idem, 30.vi.1978 (1♀ and 1♂); idem, 28.x.1978 (1♂ and 1♀) (INPA). Para, VIII, 1♂ (ANSP), Rondonia, Ouro Preto de Oeste, 21-III-1985. M.F. Torres. MPEG 05034785 1♀ (MPEG). PERU, Huanuco, Tingo Maria, IX-23, X-19-1954, X-28-1946, XI-2-1954, 4♂ (ANSP), Huanuco, Marcapata 1♂ (ANSP). ECUADOR, Valle del Santiago (Giglio-Tos, 1898). Photographic records. ECUADOR, Pastaza (Westerdujin & Cadena-Castañeda, 2014) 1♂. Zamora-Chinchipe, Río Zamora valley, El Pangui, Maralí; S 3.713300, W 78.551900; 900 meters (Holger Braun) 1♀. Redescription. Male. Pronotal disc, upper half of lateral lobes of pronotum lime green (in specimens kept in alcohol the coloration changes to brown); face yellowish-green, post-ocular strip present, black as is the thin strip of the lateral lobes of the pronotum, the tegmina, wings, thoracic sternites and upper half of the abdominal tergites. Face greenish yellow or greenish white, as are the lower half of the lateral lobes of the pronotum (Figs. 20A,D). Head, stout and moderately elongated; eyes globose but not very prominent; frontal costa highly arcuate in lateral view; dorsal carina shorth, usually not reaching the fastigium; lateral carinae blunt and poorly divergent, narrow scutellum (Fig. 20B). Pronotum, flat to very lowly tectate, extending beyond the tip of the hind femora (Figs.20A,D); anterior spine stout, apically arcuate, highly ascendant; anterior carinae absent; lateral lobes of the pronotum as wide as long, lateral shoulder carinae rounded and slightly prolonged (Fig. 20C). Tegmina elongate, slender and with an ellipsoidal, prominent subapical spot (Fig. 20C). Legs slender and elongate, fore femora with an obsolete sulcation above; with a minute, acute, external, dorso-apical spinule; mid femora six times longer than wide, with a moderately developed sulcation, internal dorso-apical spine present; hind femora with little developed pre-genicular spine. Abdomen. Subgenital plate longer than wide, narrow and deep in lateral view (Figs.20 E–G) a little upturned, narrowing to the tip, almost subarcuate (Fig. 20E), penultimate sternite with a poorly developed medial prolongation (Fig. 20F), cerci of similar thickness in all their length, obliquely truncated at the tip (Fig. 20G), epiproct triangular and with a pointed tip (Fig. 20E). Female. Similar to the male in shape and size, though it is somewhat more heavily built (Figs. 20 A–D). Subgenital plate with a broad, apical emargination; with a low, subtriangulate to subarcuate median lobe (Fig. 20E). Ovipositor thin, 2.5 times as long as the subgenital plate. Cerci conical, moderately thickened (Fig. 20F). Variation. This species mostly varies in the general coloration of the body. The greenish color of the pronotum can range from light green to green in a black backdrop, yellowish punctation usually present. In some few specimens these punctations are lacking. Face coloration can range from yellowish green (usual in the examined specimens), to a rarer beige. The apical spine of the median femora varies in its length and extent of acuteness; the female subgenital plate is variable in the depth of apical emargination and in the expression of the median lobe which is very low in some specimens. Measurements: CFP: 12,6-11,2; PL: 12,1-10,5; PLB: 2-1,7; FF: 2,9-2,1; FL: 2,8-2,6; MFL: 3-2,6; MTL: 3,1- 2,7; HL: 6,6-6,4; HW: 3,1-1,7; HL: 5,8-5,2. Distribution. Widely distributed in Amazonian Brazil, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia. Comments. This species is often mentioned in literature, but there were always some misgivings regarding ID, as there was no detailed, precise description. This is because in the brief description available until now (De Geer, 1773; Bolívar, 1887), several species of the genus with a greenish color pattern could be keyed out as S. producta and some newly, herein described species. Another factor making an objective identification difficult was the absence of the type specimen, for which it became necessary to propose a neotype specimen serving as name bearer of the species, supported by the following reasons (Art. 75 ICZN): 1. The status of the only type specimen is lost, it being deposited in NHRS, but as per visit of Josef Tumbrinck to such collection, it could not be found either by him or by the curators; this specimen was tracked through literature to 1962 in Grant’s specimens, but from then on its deposit location is unknown, because it was not found in the visits made by Daniela Santos or Marcelo Ribero to ANSP (Arts. 75.3.1., 75.3.4.). 2. The type locations of the original type (female) was Surinam, but as specimens of that location were not available, an available male from the nearest possible location with a similar geological horizon was designated (Arts. 75.3.5, 75.3.6). A male is proposed as the name bearer of the species, as this sex holds most of the characters necessary for reliable identification, unlike the female (Recommendation 75A ICZN). 3. A detailed description of the neotype, according to the general idea of the species identity, different from other taxa, ensuring the acknowledgement of the designated specimen, and with a consensus in identifications and wide distribution that characterizes the species, procuring that most identifications of the past are correct (Arts. 75.3.2, 75.3.3, 75.3.5; recommendation 75B). 4. The neotype is deposited in INPA, a collection from a renowned scientific institution, which has appropriate facilities to store and preserve the types and makes them accessible for study (Art. 75.3.7). In Grant’s thesis (1962), the author proposes S. maculata as a synonym under S. hamata, a nomenclatural act proposal (also not deemed as valid as the thesis was never officially published), with which we disagree, as characteristics that wholly differentiate both species as separate specific identities exist and have been noted. In fact, S. maculata is more closely related with S. producta than with S. hamata and similar species of the Hamata Group.Published as part of Cadena-Castañeda, Oscar J., Mendes, Diego Matheus De Mello, Silva, Daniela Santos Martins, Granda, Juan Manuel Cardona, García, Alexander García & Tumbrinck, Josef, 2019, Systematics and biogeography of the genus Scaria Bolívar, 1887 (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae: Batrachideinae), pp. 1-65 in Zootaxa 4675 (1) on pages 36-39, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4675.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/346511
Využití sociálních médií v B2B prodeji
No full textTato diplomová práce se zabývá tím, jak mohou B2B obchodníci využívat sociální média v prodeji. Na základě systematické rešerše literatury, autor zjistil, že akademici, zkoumající danou problematiku, navrhují další výzkum, a to: v kterých konkrétních krocích se dají využít sociální média v prodeji (Salo, 2017). Autor se na základě toho rozhodl zjistit, jaké sociální sítě, různé technologie a pluginy se dají využít v B2B prodeji - tzv. social sellingu. Social selling se v této práci týká primárně procesu akvizice a okrajově péčí o stávající zákazníky. Autor si vybral kvalitativní průzkum pomocí 10 hloubkových polo-strukturovaných rozhovorů, aby odhalil jak, která sociální média to jsou, tak i motivaci prodejců, proč tato média používat/nepoužívat. Aby autor dodržel správnost vyhodnocení výsledků, data byla analyzována pomocí Tématické analýzy, která v této studii vykrystalizovala 2 hlavní strategické přístupy v social sellingu. Tyto přístupy (tzv. Push a Pull strategie) obsahují praktické příklady a konkrétní aktivity, které mohou prodejci využívat v každodenní praxi. Tyto výsledky jsou prezentovány s důrazem na praktičnost a jednoduchost implementace. Tvoří proto hlavní přínos autorovo výzkumu. V poslední části autor zmiňuje výzvy a manažerská doporučení, které mohou obchodníci využít v každodenním pracovním životě.This diploma thesis focuses on social media usage in B2B sales. Based on the systematic literature review conducted by the author, he has found out that recent researchers (Salo, 2017) suggest further research in the area of how and in which sales phase should various social networking sites, technologies and plugins used. To further fill this research gap, author decided to identify these social media and their usage among B2B salespeople in the so-called social selling process. The social selling process in this thesis applies mainly to acquiring new prospects and tangentially to taking care of existing clients (follow-up step). Author has chosen a qualitative research method via conducting 10 in-depth semi-structured interviews to reveal these instruments as well as motivation of a sales person on why to use social media in the selling process. The collected data was analyzed using Thematic analysis to ensure the right procedure and to identify main themes which crystalized into 2 main strategic approaches in social selling. These approaches (Push and Pull) include practical examples of concrete activities which sales people can use in their daily jobs and are presented with focus on practicality and ease of implementation. These also form the main contribution of author`s research. In the last part, author mentions challenges in social selling and recommended managerial implications for salesforce
TeX v jednoduchém unixovém prostředí
No full textsummary:Při ladění TeXového dokumentu potřebujeme mnohokrát opakovaně pouštět TeX, podívat se, jak dopadl výsledek v prohlížeči DVI nebo PDF souboru, mrknout na výpis TeXu na terminálu, podívat se případně do logu a celou činnost opakovat. V tomto článku je ukázáno, jak tuto práci dělá autor článku. Proces "editor-TeX-kuk" je zde podporován jednoduchými unixovými nástroji: bashovým skriptem texloop, který si autor pro tyto účely vytvořil, dále terminálem Xterm a jednoduchým editorem, který umí navázat na klávesovou zkratku spuštění příkazu v systému. Čtenář se zde může inspirovat a přizpůsobit tyto nástroje svým vlastním potřebám. V článku je popsána funkce skriptu texloop, dále je neformálně rozveden dlouholetý vývoj autorova vztahu k textovým editorům a konečně je zde uvedena konfigurace terminálu Xterm, aby vyhovoval českému prostředí jak v kódování ISO-8859-2, tak v kódování UTF-8. Pro kódování UTF-8 si v závěru článku vygenerujeme TeXový formát csplain.summary:By debugging a TeX document it is necessary many times repeatedly to run TeX, to look for the result in DVI or PDF file, to gander the TeX output on the terminal, or eventually to have a look in the log-file, and all that action to repeat. In the paper it is show, how this work is made by author. The process '‘'editor-TeX-look' is supported by simple Unix tools: bash script texloop, created by author for these purposes, Xterm terminal and a simple editor, which is able to link to the shortcut key the activation of a system command. The reader could be inspired with the solution and to adapt these tools to his/her own needs. In the paper the function of the texloop script is described, and further the longstanding evolution of the author's relation to text editors is informal elaborated and finally a configuration of Xterm terminal, suitable for the czech environment with both ISO-8859-2 and UTF-8 encoding is introduced. For UTF-8 encoding the TeX format csplain is generated at the end of the paper
Scaria fasciata Hancock 1907
No full textScaria fasciata Hancock, 1907 Figs. 13, 14, 33 Type speciments. Lectotype (designated by Hebard, 1923): ♀, ECUADOR, Cachabi; circ. 500 ft, xi. 96. Rosenberg (ANSP). Paralectotype: ♂, same data as holotype (here designated). Other specimens examined. PANAMA, Chiriqui, Progreso, IV-15, 16 -1923. (4♂) (ANSP) COSTA RICA, La Emilia, near Gualipes, 1000 ft., VII-16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25—1923. (6♂ 5♀). Forest near la Emilia 1000 ft., IX- 14-1927, (3♀). Pozo Azul de Pierre on foliage on forest undergrowth 325–550 ft. VIII-19, 20, 21, 22, 23—1927, (5♂ 5♀). Chitaria, (1♂). Turrialba, (2♂). Parismina, VII-26-1928, (5♂ 1♀). Guacimo, VI-6-1909, (1♀) (ANSP) (traceable records cited by Grant, 1962). NICARAGUA, Zelaya, Sulum; 14, 15 N / 84 36 W; I-1996 Maes/ J. Hernandez, (1♀). Zelaya, Río Las Latas. 14 04N / 84 33 W. 2-VI- 97. 220m. J.M. Maes & B. Hernandez, (1♂) (MEL) COLOMBIA. Choco, Andagoya, IV, 22, 1918 (M.A. Carriker, Jr.) (1♂ 1♀). Intendencia del Choco, Boca Murindó, II, 9, 1918 (M.A. Carriker, Jr.) (1♂) (ANSP) (traceable records by Hebard, 1923). ECUADOR, Esmeraldas, Montalvo, La Mayorga, 95m. 0°53’27.2’’N, 78°13’2.5??W 14/ 17.XI.2004. F.M.B. &G. Carotti, (1♂) (misidentification by Buzzetti & Devriese, 2007 as B. mucronata). Esmeraldas, San Lorenzo, S. Francisco de Bogotá, 9/10.XIII.2004 G. Carotti, (1♀) (misidentification by Buzzetti & Devriese, 2007 as B. mucronata) (FMB). Photographic records. COLOMBIA, Choco, Bahia Solano, 6°12’29.45”N, 77°23’39.96”O (Cardona, 2012; 1 female misidentification as Tettigidea sp.). Redescription. Female. Head, legs, pronotal disc, lower margin of pronotum and abdomen white; post-ocular strip, upper margin of the lateral lobes of pronotum and lateral margins of the pronotal spine, tegmina, wings, dorsal margin of tergites and genicular lobes of the hind femora black, legs light brown; tegmina with a subapical ovoid, yellowish-white spot (Figs. 13A,B). Head. Moderately elongated, fastigium of vertex rounded and not prolongated, vertex markedly lower than the dorsal surface of the eyes; frontal costa pronounced before the eyes for all its length of the lateral carinae; dorsal carina short and with a narrow scutellum, projecting anteriorly from the fastigium (Fig. 13C). Pronotum a bit elevated on the anterior region; elongated, anterior spine moderately elevated, dorso-lateral outline weakly undulate; lateral lobes of the pronotum wider than high, lateral shoulder carina rounded and moderately prolonged, posterior margin of the lateral lobes pointed. Tegmina elongate, always with a large and ovoid subapical spot (Fig. 13D). Legs slender and little compressed; fore femora without distal spine, mid femora with an internal, dorso apical spine; hind femora with a developed pregenicular spine. Abdomen. Subgenital plate with a very narrow “v” shaped, mid-apical emargination (Fig. 13F); ovipositor 2.5 times as long as subgenital plate, valves narrow, usually serrated (Fig. 13E). Male. Similar to the female in color and build (Fig. 14 A–D); subgenital plate short, evenly arcuate apically (Fig. 14E); penultimate sternite weakly notched on mid-apical edge (Fig. 14F); epiproct lanceolate, tip with a small, narrow prolongation; cylindrical cerci, tapering slightly towards the tip (Fig. 14E). Variation. Coloration of the pronotal disc is one of the most variable features in this species, where it can be whitish or greenish with some dark spots concentrated in the dorsal midline (Fig. 14). The pronotal disc is brown, surrounded by a couple of whitish lines joining beyond the distal half (Fig. 13, 33). This color pattern is more common in females from the Pacific coast of Colombia and Ecuador (Fig. 33). On occasion, a very diffuse spot on the base of the tegmina of some specimens can occur. The fastigio-facial angle varies from approximately rectangular to obtuse-angulate. Mid femora with an internal, dorso-apical spine which varies from a blunt to a moderately well-developed spine. Sometimes the margin of the subgenital plate has a small prolongation on either side of the emargination, but this is usually lacking. Measurements: CFP: 11,23-7,41; VE: 0,8-0,5; HE: 0,9-0,7; VW: 0,8-0.5; PL: 15,40-10,29; PLB: 3-2.1; FF: 3,2-2,8; FL: 3,5-2,4; MFL: 2,76-2,0; MTL: 3,1-2,6; HL: 7,23-5,3; HW: 1,8-1,4. Distribution. This species has Ecuador (Cachabi) as type locality; it is widely distributed through the Tumbes- Chocó-Magdalena region of Colombia (Hebard, 1923), Panama to Nicaragua (Hebard, 1924), being the only species of this South American genus found to occur in Mesoamerica. It may have been identified or reported erroneously as S. hamata by Bruner (1895), Morse (1901) and Maes (1989). Therefore, it is suggested not to consider these two dubious records of S. hamata, which most certainly must correspond to S. fasciata (Hebard, 1923). Comments. In the original description, it is mentioned that the type specimens (a male and a female) were deposited in Oxford (UMO), bit it would seem as the ANSP type designation was arbitrary by Hebard (1923) and a holotype and a allotype should not have been designated, but lectotype and paralectotypes, as the original descrip- tion was performed with syntypes. In any case, the designation of lectotype for the female by Hebard is hereby considered as valid, as those were specimens mentioned in the original description, deposited in the private collection of Joseph Lane Hancock, which became part of the collection of the Hebard collection, after Hancock passed away in 1922 (Hebard, 1922).Published as part of Cadena-Castañeda, Oscar J., Mendes, Diego Matheus De Mello, Silva, Daniela Santos Martins, Granda, Juan Manuel Cardona, García, Alexander García & Tumbrinck, Josef, 2019, Systematics and biogeography of the genus Scaria Bolívar, 1887 (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae: Batrachideinae), pp. 1-65 in Zootaxa 4675 (1) on pages 27-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4675.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/346511
- …
