1,720,965 research outputs found
Role of the osteochondral unit in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: focus on the potential use of clodronate
No full textOsteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease characterized by inflammation and progressive deterioration of the joint. The etiology of OA includes genetic, phlogistic, dismetabolic and mechanical factors. Historically, cartilage was considered the target of the disease and therapy was aimed at protecting and lubricating the articular cartilage. The osteochondral unit is composed of articular cartilage, calcified cartilage, and subchondral and trabecular bone, which work synergistically to support the functional loading of the joint. Numerous studies today show that OA involves the osteochondral unit, with the participation therefore of the bone in the starting and progression of the disease, which is associated with chondropathy. Cytokines involved in the process leading to cartilage damage are also mediators of subchondral bone edema. Therefore, OA therapy must be based on the use of painkillers and bisphosphonates for both the control of osteometabolic damage and its analgesic activity. Monitoring of the disease of the osteochondral unit must be extensive, since bone marrow edema can be considered as a marker of the evolution of OA. In the present review we discuss some of the pathogenetic mechanisms associated with osteoarthritis, with particular focus on the osteochondral unit and the use of clodronate
Intramuscular clodronate in erosive osteoarthritis of the hand is effective on pain and reduces serum COMP: a randomized pilot trial-The ER.O.D.E. study (ERosive Osteoarthritis and Disodium-clodronate Evaluation)
No full textWe evaluated the efficacy and safety of intramuscular clodronate (CLO) for the treatment of active erosive osteoarthritis of the hand (EOA). Forty outpatients treated with anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) or analgesic drugs since at least 6 months, for at least 3 days a week, were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: 24 patients treated for 6 months with intramuscular (i.m.) CLO added to usual NSAIDs or analgesic drugs. The attack dose was 200 mg/day i.m. for 10 days followed by a maintenance dose of CLO i.m. 200 mg/day for 6 days after 3 and 6 months. Group B: 16 patients who continued the usual treatment with anti-inflammatory or analgesic drugs. Patients in both groups reported in a diary, day by day, the consumption of symptomatic drugs. In group A, the consumption of anti-inflammatory or analgesic drugs (p < 0.0001), pain (p < 0.0001), number of tender joints (p = 0.0097), number of swollen joints (p = 0.0251), Dreiser score (p = 0.0119), and patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity significantly decreased (both p < 0.001). At 6 months, serum COMP also significantly decreased (p < 0.0029). Strength of right (p = 0.0465) and left hand (+38%, p = ns) significantly increased. In group B, there was no significant change in all parameters considered. Intramuscular CLO in EOA of the hand is effective and safe on pain with a significant reduction in the consumption of anti-inflammatory or analgesic drugs, increasing the functionality of the hands. Serum COMP reduction suggests that CLO could play a role as a disease-modifying drug (EudraCT number 2013-000832-85)
Acute Effects of Glucocorticoid Treatment, TNFα or IL-6R Blockade on Bone Turnover Markers and Wnt Inhibitors in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Study
No full textTumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-alpha and Interleukin (IL)-6 play a fundamental role in bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), partly due to the inhibition of the Wnt canonical pathway. The aim of our study was to investigate the short-term effects of three different treatments on Wnt inhibitors (Dkk-1 and sclerostin) and on bone turnover markers (BTMs): N-propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (beta-CTX-I). We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We enrolled women affected by early RA (< 12 months) with active disease (DAS28 >= 2.6) despite a 6-month treatment with methotrexate (10-15 mg/week), who then started certolizumab pegol, tocilizumab, or methyl-prednisolone (8 mg/daily). Patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment. Blood samples were collected at baseline, week 1, and week 4. We selected 14 patients treated with certolizumab pegol, 14 patients with tocilizumab, and 20 patients with methyl-prednisolone. No difference between any of the tested parameters was found at baseline. beta-CTX-I, Dkk-1, and sclerostin decreased after 1 week of treatment with certolizumab pegol (- 27% +/- 21.5, - 50% +/- 13.2, and - 30% +/- 30.4, respectively, p < 0.05). Methyl-prednisolone induced similar changes, albeit less marked, on beta-CTX-I and Wnt inhibitors, with a decrease in PINP (- 16.1% +/- 16.5, p < 0.05). Tocilizumab did not significantly affect BTMs or Wnt inhibitors. No significant changes were found for PTH and 25OHD. In the first four weeks of treatment, TNF alpha inhibition showed strong effects on BTMs and Wnt inhibitors, differently from IL-6 blockade. Glucocorticoids induced similar changes; nonetheless, they showed undesired effects on bone formation
Bone fracture risk: Density and microarchitecture qualification
Full text linkOsteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease where an increase in bone fragility is due to low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue, which occur over a long period of time without clinical significance.
Currently, Double Energy X-ray Absorption (DEXA) is the gold standard for bone mineral density assessment and the diagnosis of osteoporosis, but the majority of fractures occur in patients who would not be considered at fracture risk based on their Bone Mineral Density (BMD) values. It has long been known that fracture risk depends not only on mass loss, but also on bone architecture, whose alterations are an independent factor of increased fragility.
The Bone Elastic Structure Test, BES TEST®, is a recently introduced analysis that assesses bone quality as expressed by the elastic properties of the trabecular micro-architecture from a virtual biopsy of the patient and could be a helpful add-on to densitometry for predicting fragility fractures and patient monitoring.
The aim of this study is the comparison of DEXA and BES TEST® ability as 3-year risk estimators in a clinical application.
In the CONTROL group, the BSI T-score is significantly different from the femoral DEXA T-score (p = 0.0005). In the FRACTURED group, the BSI T-score is significantly different from both the femoral DEXA T-score (p = 0.0266) and the lumbar DEXA T-score (p = 0.0051). Inter-group t-test statistical analysis (95% significance) shows that the femoral DEXA T-score (neck) of the CONTROL and the FRACTURED groups are not significantly different (p = 0.1478), while the BSI T-score of the CONTROL and the FRACTURED groups highlights a significant difference (p = 0.0001). Despite the small number of subjects, our data seem to confirm that the BSI could be a helpful add-on to densitometry for predicting fragility fractures and patient monitoring
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
