1,720,967 research outputs found

    sarah-hanus/pipeline_oggm_cwatm: v1.0.0

    No full text
    <p>This is the first release of the pipeline to transform OGGM outputs to CWatM inputs and thus allow to sequentially couple OGGM to CWatM.</p&gt

    sarah-hanus/hbv-mountain: Semi-distributed Hydrological Model

    No full text
    This is a process-based semi-distributed hydrological model implemented in Julia programming language. It contains the Model Core, some testing, a calibration scheme and functions for analyzing the results. For any question, feel free to contact me

    sarah-hanus/hbv-mountain: Semi-Distributed Hydrological Model in Julia Programming Language

    No full text
    This is a process-based semi-distributed hydrological model implemented in Julia programming language. It was created as part of my MSc thesis at TU Delft to investigate changes in runoff dynamics in Alpine catchments in response to climate change. It contains the Model Core, some testing, a calibration scheme and functions for analyzing the results. For any question, feel free to contact me

    OGGM/massbalance-sandbox: Version used in Hanus et al. glacier-hydro coupling manuscript

    No full text
    <p>This is the OGGM/massbalance-sandbox version used by @sarah-hanus for her manuscript ("Coupling a large-scale glacier and hydrological model (OGGM v1.5.3 and CWatM V1.08) – Towards an improved representation of mountain water resources in global assessments") that is soon submitted to Geoscientific Model Development (GMD). The branch is identical to the commit: https://github.com/OGGM/massbalance-sandbox/commit/7c055cc96e45389f9d1643cf6b5c28bca643957c</p&gt

    Modelled runoff in contrasting Alpine catchments in Austria

    No full text
    GENERAL INFORMATION The datasets were generated using the hydrological model from https://github.com/sarah-hanus/hbv-mountain. The datasets are used for the analysis presented in the following preprint: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-92 This directory contains runoff simulations and melt contribution simulations of six Austrian catchments (Feistritztal, Paltental, Gailtal, Silbertal, Defreggental and Pitztal) from 14 climate models for 2 emission scenarios for a 30-year timeperiod in the past and at the end of the 21st century. DATA & FILE OVERVIEW The data is sorted by RCP (4.5 & 8.5) and by climate model used (in total 14 models per RCP). *_past_2010.csv refers for data for the timeseries 1981-2010 *_future_2100.csv refers to data at the end of the 21st century. Due to inconsistencies in timeseries for climate models at end of the 21 st century the timeseries varies from 2069-2098 to 2071-2100 (see files timeseries_future_2100 in each directory). The rows of the files is output from different parameter sets (total 300), the columns define the day as mentioned in the timeseries_*.txt files Units: discharge data: m³/s snow melt contribution: mm/

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore