1,720,984 research outputs found
Antonio Montefusco - Intorno al libro di Sara Bischetti, "La tradizione manoscritta dell’Ars dictaminis nell’Italia medievale. Mise en page e mise en texte"
No full textPresentazione del volume di Sara Bischetti, La tradizione manoscritta dell’Ars dictaminis nell’Italia medievale. Mise en page e mise en texte, Berlino, De Gruyter, 2021 (Toscana Bilingue. Storia sociale della traduzione medievale / Bilingualism in Medieval Tuscany 4). Questo libro sul dictamen medievale presenta molti aspetti originali. La storia della retorica nell’Italia medievale è qui ripercorsa con gli strumenti della paleografia declinata come storia della scrittura, grazie a un uso de..
Recensione a Toscana bilingue (1260 ca.-1430 ca.). Per una storia sociale del tradurre medievale, a cura di Sara Bischetti, Michele Lodone, Cristiano Lorenzi, Antonio Montefusco, Berlin-Boston, de Gruyter, 2021, 538 pp.
No full textIl contributo contiene una recensione dettagliata al volume Toscana bilingue (1260 ca.-1430 ca.). Per una storia sociale del tradurre
medievale, a cura di Sara Bischetti, Michele Lodone, Cristiano Lorenzi, Antonio Montefusco, Berlin-Boston, de Gruyter, 2021,
538 pp
Sara Bischetti, La tradizione manoscritta dell’”ars dictaminis” nell’Italia medievale. “Mise en page” e “mise en texte”, De Gruyter, Berlin-Boston 2022, pp. 242, 20 tavv. f.t. (Toscana bilingue. Bilingualism in Medieval Tuscany, 4).
No full textrecensione a Sara Bischetti, La tradizione manoscritta dell’„ars dictaminis“ nell’Italia medievale.
„Mise en page“ e „mise en texte“, Berlin-Boston (De Gruyter) 2022 (Toscana Bilingue.
Storia sociale della traduzione medievale/Bilingualism in Medieval Tuscany 4), 242 pp.,
ISBN 978-3-11-070150-0
Recension de Sara Bischetti, La tradizione manoscritta dell’« ars dictaminis » nell’Italia medievale. « Mise en page » et « mise en texte », Berlin-Boston, De Gruyter, 2022
No full textInternational audienceReview of Sara BISCHETTI, La tradizione manoscritta dell'ars dictaminis nell'Italia medievale. “Mise en page” et ‘mise en texte’, Berlin-Boston, De Gruyter, 2022, 1 vol. in-8°, 242 p. (Toscana bilingue. Bilingualism in medieval Tuscany, 4). The review highlights the originality of the book, which is the first to carry out a codicological and quantitative analysis, in line with the techniques of book material history developed over the last two generations, on successful ars dictaminis treatises (essentially Guido Faba and GIovanni di Bonandrea). The book certainly presents a breakthrough and a model for future research, and is freely downloadable.Recension de Sara BISCHETTI, La tradizione manoscritta dell'« ars dictaminis » nell'Italia medievale. « Mise en page » et « mise en texte », Berlin-Boston, De Gruyter, 2022, 1 vol. in-8°, 242 p. (Toscana bilingue. Bilingualism in medieval Tuscany, 4). La recension met en valeur l'originalité du livre qui est le premier à faire une analyse codicologique et quantitative, dans la lignée des techniques d'histoire matérielle du livre développées durant les deux dernières générations, sur des traités d'ars dictaminis à succès (essentiellement Guido Faba et GIovanni di Bonandrea). Le livre présente certainement une percée et un modèle pour des recherches futures, et il est téléchargeable en libre accès
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
