1,720,967 research outputs found
Library Trends 48 (2) 1999: Progress in Visual Information Access and Retrieval
Made available in DSpace on 2008-05-22T20:21:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3
librarytrendsv48i2_ocr.txt: 548369 bytes, checksum: 2e942a39a3d396edcfcd1e6725fc3b87 (MD5)
librarytrendsv48i2_tei.xml: 670178 bytes, checksum: 4f3d970d6500dc3f577826e28d60ff86 (MD5)
librarytrendsv48i2_opt.pdf: 8901059 bytes, checksum: f6a40679cf14419f3d50b8cae8acfb4b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 1999published or submitted for publicatio
Library Trends 48 (2) 1999: Progress in Visual Information Access and Retrieval
published or submitted for publicatio
Introduction to Library Trends 48 (2) 1999: Progress in Visual Information Access and Retrieval
Made available in DSpace on 2008-05-22T20:21:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
librarytrendsv48i2b_opt.pdf: 136699 bytes, checksum: eb688722093a29d6f4fe1912c7a4eeb6 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 1999published or submitted for publicatio
Bibliotecas e Internet.
Traducción del capitulo "Libraries and The Internet" del libro Techno logy and Managernent in Library and Information Services, de F. Wilfrid Lan caster y Betb Sandore. Trata sobre la influencia de Internet en los servicios y operaciones bibliotecarias. Apunta los esfuerzos más destacables en la integra ción de la red Internet en las bibliotecas americanas y las actuaciones más re levantes llevadas a cabo por organismos internacionales comprometidos con la normalización y la transmisión electrónica de datos bibliográficos. También explica los cambios que se están produciendo los roles de los profesionales bi bliotecarios y los nuevos puestos de trabajo que están surgiendo en este tipo de unidades informativas
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
ECHO DEPository - Phase 2: 2008-2010 Final Report of Project Activities
This narrative report provides an overview of ECHO DEP Phase 2 activities and accomplishments. Accompanying appendices and referenced download facilities make available specific additional project deliverables (e.g., EMP’s evaluation of existing NER tools and the ontology developed by the Semantic Archive project). Many of these materials, as well as this report itself, are archived in IDEALS1, the institutional repository at the University of Illinois, and thus available for future public access.
A note about nomenclature: to reduce confusion about phases (e.g., there is a Phase 2 of ECHO DEP, but there are also phases of development within a discrete project), the second phase of ECHO DEP will herein be termed “ECHO DEP 2.” (Accordingly, “ECHO DEP 1” denotes the first phase of ECHO DEP.)not peer reviewedSubmitted by Jacob Nash ([email protected]) on 2013-02-25T21:22:32Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
FinalReport20110413.pdf: 2437901 bytes, checksum: 4667bf5219e161d8735952eab277f1e3 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2013-02-25T21:22:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
FinalReport20110413.pdf: 2437901 bytes, checksum: 4667bf5219e161d8735952eab277f1e3 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-06-30unpublishe
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Introduction: The Library of Congress National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program
Submitted by Sarah Shreeves ([email protected]) on 2009-08-14T14:25:37Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
LibraryTrends573_Intro.pdf: 150741 bytes, checksum: 5d7c9ecd0cfb120c678c1ae392c96ae7 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2009-08-14T14:25:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
LibraryTrends573_Intro.pdf: 150741 bytes, checksum: 5d7c9ecd0cfb120c678c1ae392c96ae7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009Item withdrawn by Sarah Shreeves ([email protected]) on 2009-08-14T14:25:37Z
Item was in collections:
Library Trends 57 (3) Winter 2009: Library of Congress NDIIP Program (Restricted) (ID: 643)
No. of bitstreams: 1
LibraryTrends573_Intro.pdf: 150741 bytes, checksum: 5d7c9ecd0cfb120c678c1ae392c96ae7 (MD5)Item marked as completely restricted (or under embargo) by Sarah Shreeves ([email protected]) on 2009-08-14T14:25:37Z
Item is restricted until 2011-03-14T14:23:12ZItem reinstated by Sarah Shreeves ([email protected]) on 2010-02-10T20:33:10Z
Item was in collections:
Library Trends 57 (3) Winter 2009: Library of Congress NDIIP Program (Restricted) (ID: 643)
No. of bitstreams: 1
LibraryTrends573_Intro.pdf: 150741 bytes, checksum: 5d7c9ecd0cfb120c678c1ae392c96ae7 (MD5)Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves ([email protected]) on 2011-03-15T10:00:07Z
Item was in collections:
Library Trends 57 (3) Winter 2009: Library of Congress NDIIP Program (Restricted) (ID: 643)
No. of bitstreams: 2
LibraryTrends573_Intro.pdf: 150741 bytes, checksum: 5d7c9ecd0cfb120c678c1ae392c96ae7 (MD5)
LibraryTrends573_Intro.pdf.txt: 39656 bytes, checksum: 4c2e07bcdb47f2a183cffd1d44c5fd50 (MD5)Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves ([email protected]) on 2011-03-15T10:00:08Zpublished or submitted for publicatio
- …
