1,721,004 research outputs found

    Advanced distributed modelling of slope stability using root reinforcement and geostatistical parameterization of geotechnical soil properties

    Full text link
    A physically based model for shallow landslide triggering (HIRESSS - HIgh REsolution Soil Stability Simulator) was applied in a 100 km2 test site in Central Italy (Urbino, Marche region). The objectives were assessing the influence of additional cohesion provided by roots and testing the effectiveness of a geotechnical characterization performed in an another area, but on similar lithologies. We performed two different simulations considering the rainfall event of January-February 2006, which triggered 14 landslides in the area. For both the simulations, rainfall data were fed into the model using the measurements at hourly time step of a nearby rain gauge station, while soil thickness was estimated using a state-of-the-art empirical model based on geomorphological parameters derived from curvature, slope gradient, lithology and relative position within the hillslope profile. Geotechnical input data were varied among the two simulations. In the first one, a few in-situ and laboratory tests were performed to characterize the main lithologies, while the remaining lithologies were characterized using literature data. In the second simulation, the main geotechnical and hydrological parameters (cohesion, internal friction angle, soil unit weight, hydraulic conductivity) were fed into the model using a geostatistical characterization performed on hundreds of measurements carried out in another Italian region, with similar lithologies. Furthermore, in the second simulation the additional cohesion provided by the plant roots was also taken into account. The results obtained with the two simulations were validated considering the landslide dataset collected by field work and image interpretation shortly after the rainfall event studied. We discovered that the second simulation provided much more reliable results, with the areas surrounding the landslide locations characterized by much higher values of failure probability. The outcome is very important to address future research in distributed slope stability modelling because it proved that: (i) additional root cohesion is an important factor that can be used to get more reliable results; (ii) when in need of characterizing the geotechnical parameters of the study area, instead of using just a few measurements performed therein, it is preferable to integrate also data coming from different areas but with similar lithologies if they were robustly characterized in geostatistical terms purposely for distributed slope stability studies

    An advice for the authors

    No full text

    An advice to authos

    No full text

    Response to Referee1

    No full text

    An advice for the authors

    No full text

    Response to Referee2

    No full text

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore