1,720,954 research outputs found
Epistemological access: a case of academic development programmes at a university of technology
Full text linkSouth Africa has made significant progress in expanding access to higher education since the end of the apatheid era. This gave opportunities to a larger portion of the population to pursue higher education studies, especially those from previously disadvantaged communities. The growth in student enrollment has not always correlate with academic success. High levels of failure and dropout rates amongst first-year students are a common challenge across universities. This implies that the challenges related to epistemic access at universities persist. To address these challenges, universities implemented academic development programmes providing targeted interventions and fostering a supportive learning environment that can help bridge the gap between formal access to universities and epistemic access. The study that informs this paper sought to explore how academic development programmes enable epistemological access to first-year students. This study employed a qualitative methodological approach and adopted a purposive sampling strategy to select the participants. The study interviewed twenty mentors participating in an academic development programme (mentorship) at a University of Technology. The findings highlights the role of academic development programme (mentorship programme) in enabling students to transition from unfamiliarity to familiarity within their chosen field of study, leading to an epistemic shift that alters their epistemological level. These findings can contribute to the broader discussions and advancements in higher education pedagogy by highlighting the importance of and understanding the mechanisms behind the mentorship programme. The implications of this study on higher education is to inform the design and implementation of effective initiatives that foster epistemological growth and empower students to engage with disciplinary knowledge more effectivel
Students’ transition experiences: positioning FYE interventions in a student transition model
Full text linkThe transition from high school to university can be a challenging and overwhelming experience for many students. As such, it is imperative for higher education institutions to implement effective interventions to support students during this critical period. This article examines the positioning of First-Year Experience (FYE) interventions within a student transition model. The study was conducted by reviewing existing studies, articles, and books related to FYE interventions and their impact on students' transition experiences. The researchers utilised various academic databases, such as EBSCO, JSTOR, and Google Scholar to gather relevant literature on the topic. The methodology used in this study involved systematically searching for and critically evaluating existing literature on FYE interventions and their role in students' transition experiences. The researchers then synthesized and analyzed the findings from the selected literature to identify trends and gaps in the existing research. Through a review of existing literature, this article explores the various factors that influence students’ transition experiences, the role of FYE interventions, and recommendations for future research and practice. The findings of this research indicate that students’ transition experiences are multifaceted, encompassing academic, social, and personal adjustments. Academic stress, social integration, and identity development are identified as key challenges, faced by students during their transition to university life. The role of FYE interventions in addressing these challenges is perceived to be crucial, highlighting the importance of academic support, mentorship, and opportunities for social connection, provided by these programs. The implications of this research suggest the need for a holistic student transition model that encompasses academic, social, and personal dimensions of the transition experience. FYE interventions are positioned within this model as a key component in supporting students through their transition to university life. The findings also emphasize the importance of tailoring FYE programs to meet the diverse needs of students, taking into account factors, such as cultural background, socioeconomic status, and individual learning styles. In conclusion, this research contributes to the understanding of students’ transition experiences and the positioning of FYE interventions within a comprehensive student transition model. It highlights the diverse challenges, faced by students during their transition to university, and underscores the importance of tailoring FYE programs to meet these challenges. The findings of this research have implications for the design and implementation of effective FYE interventions, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that addresses the academic, social, and personal dimensions of students’ transition experiences
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
