1,720,993 research outputs found
Sam Fuller
Get PDFNosferatu (1993). Sam Fuller. Donostia Kultura. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/40853.Importación Masiva111
Las películas de Sam Fuller
Get PDFAguilar Ricardo Aldarondo, C. (1993). Las películas de Sam Fuller. Nosferatu. Revista de cine. (12):78-113. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/40865.Importación Masiva781131
Underworld U.S.A. (Sam Fuller, 1960)
Get PDFLa Torre, JM. (2006). Underworld U.S.A. (Sam Fuller, 1960). Nosferatu. Revista de cine. (53):174-175. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/41496.Importación Masiva1741755
Forty Guns (Sam Fuller, 1957)
Get PDFLa Torre, JM. (2006). Forty Guns (Sam Fuller, 1957). Nosferatu. Revista de cine. (53):170-171. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/41494.Importación Masiva1701715
Sam Fuller: the cinema fuller of life
Get PDFGuarner, JL. (1993). Sam Fuller: the cinema fuller of life. Nosferatu. Revista de cine. (12):4-11. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/40855.Importación Masiva4111
El western visto por Sam Fuller
Get PDFLa Torre, JM. (1993). El western visto por Sam Fuller. Nosferatu. Revista de cine. (12):12-17. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/40856.Importación Masiva12171
Corredor sin retorno (Shock Corridor; Sam Fuller, 1963)
Get PDFEtxebeste, Z. (2006). Corredor sin retorno (Shock Corridor; Sam Fuller, 1963). Nosferatu. Revista de cine. (53):176-177. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/41497.Importación Masiva1761775
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
