2,811 research outputs found
Coauthor prediction for junior researchers
Get PDFResearch collaboration can bring in different perspectives and generate more productive results. However, finding an appropriate collaborator can be difficult due to the lacking of sufficient information. Link prediction is a related technique for collaborator discovery; but its focus has been mostly on the core authors who have relatively more publications. We argue that junior researchers actually need more help in finding collaborators. Thus, in this paper, we focus on coauthor prediction for junior researchers. Most of the previous works on coauthor prediction considered global network feature and local network feature separately, or tried to combine local network feature and content feature. But we found a significant improvement by simply combing local network feature and global network feature. We further developed a regularization based approach to incorporate multiple features simultaneously. Experimental results demonstrated that this approach outperformed the simple linear combination of multiple features. We further showed that content features, which were proved to be useful in link prediction, can be easily integrated into our regularization approach. © 2013 Springer-Verlag
Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Life Proyect
No full textNuestros Colaboradores, Instrucciones para el Autor, Objetivos de la Revista y Proyecto de Vida de la Revista Páginas No.89Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Life Proyect of the Revue Páginas No.8
Types of Scientific Collaborators: A Perspective of Author Contribution Network
Get PDFThe purpose of this study is to investigate interaction between collaborators within individual studies by measuring how they made contributions to their studies. Author contribution network is constructed based on the author contribution statements of 140,000 full-text articles in PloS by viewing every collaborator as a node and a shared contribution as an edge. Three types of contributors are identified: general team-players, factotums, and mavericks. The preliminary result suggests that division of labor widely exists in scientific re-search and the latter two types of collaborators are common in small teams.Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-12T15:28:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
Lu-Chao_20180417_V01.pdf: 365239 bytes, checksum: 8e321b79b4d7f4e401a356426425f971 (MD5)
license.txt: 4802 bytes, checksum: 58353f9dd6876860dd5221f3d7872a95 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 201
Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Institucional repositories and 40 years of the UCP
No full textNuestros Colaboradores, Instrucciones para el Autor, Objetivos de la Revista, Repositorios Institucionales y Los 40 años de la UCP de la Revista Páginas No. 98Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Institucional repositories and 40 years of the UCP of the Revue Páginas No.9
The Hymn of the UCPR, Our collaborators, Revue objectives and Instructions for the author
No full textEl Himno de la Universidad Católica Popular del Risaralda, Nuestros Colaboradores, Objetivos de la Revista y Instrucciones para el Autor de la Revista Páginas No.78The Hymn of the Universidad Católica Popular del Risaralda, Our collaborators, Revue Objectives and Instructions for the author of the Revue Páginas No.7
Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Institucional repositories and 40 years of the UCP
No full textNuestros Colaboradores, Instrucciones para el Autor, Objetivos de la Revista, Repositorios Institucionales y Los 40 años de la UCP de la Revista Páginas No. 98Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Institucional repositories and 40 years of the UCP of the Revue Páginas No.9
Various Writings: Chapter One
No full textAbstract accepted for performed presentation to be be delivered at the Society of Artistic Research's 8th International Conference on Artistic Research. To be held at the University of the Arts Helsinki, Finland in April 2017. The presentation will form a three-way 'trialogue' between the collaborators (Christoforidou, Ridout, Star) on their collaborative research into understanding the act of writing
"Collaborators’ Bill of Rights"
Get PDFCuratorial note from Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Teamwork and collaboration are key components of any project, particularly digital ones. However, clear models for recognizing team-member contributions to digital projects are not present within the humanities, what with its historical emphasis on the single author. As a result, the participants in the “Off the Tracks—Laying New Lines for Digital Humanities Scholars” workshop developed the “Collaborators’ Bill of Rights” with the fundamental principle that “all kinds of work on a project are equally deserving of credit” (par. 1). Anyone starting a digital project with other individuals will want to refer to this document to guide discussions about the different ways to recognize effort within the project. It could also serve as a foundational document for the development of project charters (see “Toward a Project Charter” and “The Iterative Design of a Project Charter for Interdisciplinary Research” as well as the Center for Digital Humanities’ “Student Collaborators’ Bill of Rights,” which is an artifact included in the keywords “Labor” and “Collaboration”)
Predictors and outcomes of first pass efficacy in posterior circulation strokes: Insights from STAR collaboration
No full textBackground: First-pass efficacy (FPE) has been established as an important predictor of favorable functional outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (ET) in anterior circulation strokes. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigate predictors and clinical outcomes of FPE in posterior circulation strokes (pcAIS). Methods: The Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry database was used to identify pcAIS patients who achieved FPE. Their baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared with the non-FPE group. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0–3. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses were done to evaluate predictors of FPE. Safety outcomes included distal emboli, vessel rupture, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Results: Of 359 patients, 179 (50%) achieved FPE. Clot burden, occlusion site, and ET technique-related variables were similar between the two groups except for shorter procedure time with FPE. The primary outcome was significantly better with FPE (56.4% vs. 32.8%, p < 0.001). Complications were similar except for a higher rate of distal emboli in non-FPE group (11.1% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.032). Atrial fibrillation (Afib) had increased odds (aOR: 2.06, 95% CI; 1.24, 3.4, p = 0.005) and prior ischemic stroke had decreased odds (aOR: 0.524, 95% CI; 0.28, 0.97, p = 0.04) of FPE. Afib was the only independent predictor of FPE on MVA (1.94, 95% CI; 1.1, 3.43, p = 0.022). Conclusions: Higher rate of FPE in Afib-related pcAIS could possibly be explained by the differences in clot composition and degree of in-situ atherosclerotic disease burden. Future studies are warranted to explore the relationship of clot composition with ET outcomes
- …
