449 research outputs found
FIGURE 5 in Neokamalomyces indicus gen. nov., sp. nov. (Mycosphaerellaceae)-a Septoria-like genus from India
No full textFIGURE 5. Conidia of Neokamalomyces indicus (AMH 10233, holotype). Bars: a–k = 10 μm, l, m = 5 μm.Published as part of Yadav, Sanjay, Verma, Sanjeet Kumar, Singh, Raghvendra, Singh, Vinay Kumar, Chaurasia, Balmukund, Singh, Paras Nath & Kumar, Shambhu, 2022, Neokamalomyces indicus gen. nov., sp. nov. (Mycosphaerellaceae)-a Septoria-like genus from India, pp. 141-168 in Phytotaxa 571 (2) on page 160, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.571.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/728430
FIGURE 1 in Neokamalomyces indicus gen. nov., sp. nov. (Mycosphaerellaceae)-a Septoria-like genus from India
No full textFIGURE 1. Consensus phylogram (50% majority rule) resulting from a maximum likelihood of the combined three-genes (LSU, RPB2 and ITS) sequence alignment. The Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.50; BI-PP), maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (≥ 50%; ML-BS) and maximum parsimony bootstrap support values (≥ 50%; MP-BS) are given at the nodes (BI-PP/ML-BS/MP-BS). Red names indicate Neokamalomyces indicus. A vertical bar is used to the right of the coloured boxes and encompasses all genera within their respective families. The family name Mycosphaerellaceae is unabbreviated while the rest are abbreviated as follows: D = Dissoconiaceae, P = Phaeothecoidiellaceae, S = Schizothyriaceae, T = Teratosphaeriaceae, C = Cladosporiaceae. The tree is rooted to Cylindroseptoria ceratoniae (CBS 477.69).Published as part of Yadav, Sanjay, Verma, Sanjeet Kumar, Singh, Raghvendra, Singh, Vinay Kumar, Chaurasia, Balmukund, Singh, Paras Nath & Kumar, Shambhu, 2022, Neokamalomyces indicus gen. nov., sp. nov. (Mycosphaerellaceae)-a Septoria-like genus from India, pp. 141-168 in Phytotaxa 571 (2) on page 154, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.571.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/728430
Neokamalomyces Sanjay & Raghv. Singh 2022, gen. nov.
No full textNeokamalomyces Sanjay & Raghv. Singh, gen. nov. MycoBank: MB 843767 Type species:— Neokamalomyces indicus Sanjay & Raghv. Singh. Diagnosis:— Differs from Parapallidocercospora by its very well developed pycnidial conidiomata with a central ostiolum, and hyaline conidiogenous cells lining the inner cavity. Etymology:— Prefix ‘ Neo ’ meaning new and genus suffix ‘ kamalomyces ’ based on the living legend Professor Kamal (DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India), a renowned mycologist and monographer of Cercosporoid Fungi of India. Conidiomata pycnidial, brown to dark brown, subepidermal, epigenous, numerous in each lesion, immersed to erumpent, subglobose to globose, with a central ostiolum, releasing a hyaline conidial mass; outer cells with brown, somewhat thickened walls, inner cells hyaline, thin-walled. Ostiole single, circular, central. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells lining the inner cavity. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, tightly aggregated, cylindrical and tapering gradually toward the apex, ampulliform or lageniform with a relatively long neck, holoblastic, proliferating sympodially, smooth; scars unthickened. Conidia cylindrical, weakly to strongly curved, or flexuous, gradually attenuated to a rounded apex, gradually or more abruptly attenuated into a broadly truncate base, septate, not or indistinctly constricted around the septa, hyaline to light olivaceous, hila unthickened to slightly thickened. Sexual morph not seen.Published as part of Yadav, Sanjay, Verma, Sanjeet Kumar, Singh, Raghvendra, Singh, Vinay Kumar, Chaurasia, Balmukund, Singh, Paras Nath & Kumar, Shambhu, 2022, Neokamalomyces indicus gen. nov., sp. nov. (Mycosphaerellaceae) - a Septoria-like genus from India, pp. 141-168 in Phytotaxa 571 (2) on page 156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.571.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/728430
Curing Cholera: Pathogens, Places and Poverty in South Asia
No full textIn this paper I will seek to provide a new understanding of endemicity of disease in India. Through a study of cholera research in the twentieth century I will argue that disease and its endemicity has to be understood in biological factors as well as within a wider social and economic context. I will discuss the medical efforts at locating the causality of cholera from the nineteenth century in Indian climate, water bodies and human anatomy to show that cholera is no more a biological phenomena than water is an ecological or environmental problem. Both are essentially political and economic questions
The development of supergravity grand unification: Circa 1982 1985
No full textThe development in the early eighties of supergravity grand unified models with gravity-mediated breaking of supersymmetry has led to a remarkable progress in the study of supersymmetry at colliders, in dark matter and in a variety of other experimental searches in the intervening years since that time. The purpose of this note is to review this development and describe our construction of this theory in the period 1982-1985. © 2012 World Scientific Publishing Company.Aad G, 2012, PHYS LETT B, V716, P1, DOI 10.1016-j.physletb.2012.08.020; Ahmed Z, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P1619, DOI 10.1126-science.1186112; Ahmed Z, 2009, PHYS REV LETT, V102, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.102.011301; Akula S, 2012, PHYS REV D, V85, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.85.075001; ALVAREZGAUME L, 1983, NUCL PHYS B, V221, P495, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(83)90591-6; Aprile E., ARXIV11042549ASTROPH; ARNOWITT R, 1983, PHYS REV LETT, V50, P232, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.50.232; ARNOWITT R, 1985, PHYS LETT B, V156, P215, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(85)91512-6; ARNOWITT R, 1992, PHYS REV LETT, V69, P725, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.69.725; Arnowitt R., 1962, GRAVITATION INTRO CU; Arnowitt R, 2008, PHYS REV LETT, V100, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.100.231802; ARNOWITT R, 1975, PHYS LETT B, VB 56, P81, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(75)90504-3; Arnowitt R. L., 1983, WORKSH PROBL UN SUP; BAER H, 1994, PHYS REV D, V50, P2148, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.50.2148; BAER H, 1986, PHYS REV LETT, V57, P294, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.57.294; Baer H., 2006, WEAK SCALE SUPERSYMM; BAER H, 1985, PHYS LETT B, V155, P278, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(85)90654-9; BAER H, 1994, PHYS REV D, V50, P4508, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.50.4508; BARBIERI R, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V119, P343, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90685-2; BARBIERI R, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V113, P219, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90825-5; BARGER V, 1994, PHYS REV D, V49, P4908, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.49.4908; Bornhauser S, 2012, EUR PHYS J C, V72, DOI 10.1140-epjc-s10052-012-1887-3; Bouchet FR, 2007, MOD PHYS LETT A, V22, P1857, DOI 10.1142-S0217732307025078; Bueno A., 2007, JHEP, V0704, P041, DOI 10.1088-1126-6708-2007-04-041; CANDELAS P, 1985, NUCL PHYS B, V258, P46, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(85)90602-9; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1981, PHYS REV D, V24, P3065, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.24.3065; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1977, NUCL PHYS B, V129, P39, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(77)90018-9; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1981, NUCL PHYS B, V185, P403, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(81)90326-6; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1982, PHYS REV LETT, V49, P970, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.49.970; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V129, P445, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90137-5; Chamseddine AH, 2001, NUCL PHYS B-PROC SUP, V101, P145, DOI 10.1016-S0920-5632(01)01501-8; Chatrchyan S, 2012, PHYS LETT B, V716, P30, DOI 10.1016-j.physletb.2012.08.021; CREMMER E, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V116, P231, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90332-X; CREMMER E, 1983, NUCL PHYS B, V212, P413, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(83)90679-X; CREMMER E, 1979, NUCL PHYS B, V147, P105, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(79)90417-6; DESER S, 1976, PHYS LETT B, V62, P335, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(76)90089-7; DICUS DA, 1983, PHYS REV LETT, V51, P1030, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.51.1030; DICUS DA, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V129, P451, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90138-7; DIMOPOULOS S, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V112, P133, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90313-6; DIMOPOULOS S, 1981, NUCL PHYS B, V193, P150, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(81)90522-8; DIMOPOULOS S, 1981, PHYS REV D, V24, P1681, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.24.1681; Drees M., 2004, SPARTICLES; ELIASSON E, 1984, PHYS LETT B, V147, P65, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(84)90593-8; Ellis J, ARXIV12023262HEPPH; ELLIS J, 1984, NUCL PHYS B, V247, P373, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(84)90555-8; ELLIS J, 1982, NUCL PHYS B, V202, P43, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(82)90220-6; ELLIS J, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V121, P123, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90900-0; ELLIS J, 1984, NUCL PHYS B, V238, P453, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(84)90461-9; FAYET P, 1975, NUCL PHYS B, VB 90, P104, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(75)90636-7; Feldman D, 2007, PHYS REV LETT, V99, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.99.251802; FERRARA S, 1978, PHYS LETT B, V76, P404, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(78)90893-6; FERRARA S, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V123, P214, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90425-2; FREEDMAN DZ, 1976, PHYS REV D, V13, P3214, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.13.3214; GIRARDELLO L, 1982, NUCL PHYS B, V194, P65, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(82)90512-0; GIUDICE GF, 1988, PHYS LETT B, V206, P480, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(88)91613-9; GOLDBERG H, 1983, PHYS REV LETT, V50, P1419, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.50.1419; GOLFAND YA, 1971, JETP LETT-USSR, V13, P323; HABER HE, 1985, PHYS REP, V117, P75, DOI 10.1016-0370-1573(85)90051-1; Hagiwara K, 2011, J PHYS G NUCL PARTIC, V38, DOI 10.1088-0954-3899-38-8-085003; HALL L, 1983, PHYS REV D, V27, P2359, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.27.2359; Heinemeyer S, 2004, NUCL PHYS B, V699, P103, DOI 10.1016-j.nuclphysb.2004.08.014; Herten G., COMMUNICATION; Hoecker A, 2011, NUCL PHYS B-PROC SUP, V218, P189, DOI 10.1016-j.nuclphysbps.2011.06.031; IBANEZ L, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V118, P73, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90604-9; IBANEZ L, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V110, P215; IBANEZ LE, 1984, NUCL PHYS B, V233, P511, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(84)90581-9; IBANEZ LE, 1985, NUCL PHYS B, V256, P218, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(85)90393-1; IBANEZ LE, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V126, P54, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90015-1; INOUE K, 1982, PROG THEOR PHYS, V68, P927, DOI 10.1143-PTP.68.927; KANE GL, 1994, PHYS REV D, V49, P6173, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.49.6173; Komatsu E., 2007, ASTROPHYS J SUPPL SE, V170, P377; Komatsu E., 2003, ASTROPHYS J, V148, P175; Komatsu E, 2011, ASTROPHYS J SUPPL S, V192, DOI 10.1088-0067-0049-192-2-18; KOSOWER DA, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V133, P305, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90152-1; KRAUSS LM, 1983, NUCL PHYS B, V227, P556, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(83)90574-6; Martin S.P., 1998, PERSPECTIVES SUPERSY, P1; NATH P, 1985, PHYS REV D, V32, P2348, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.32.2348; NATH P, 1975, PHYS LETT B, VB 56, P177, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(75)90297-X; Nath P., 1983, 2588 NUB; Nath P., 1987, MOD PHYS LETT A, V2, P331, DOI 10.1142-S0217732387000446; NATH P, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V121, P33, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90196-X; Nath P., 1984, APPL N 1 SUPERGRAVIT; NATH P, 1983, NUCL PHYS B, V227, P121, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(83)90145-1; Nath P., 1984, SUPERSYMMETRY SUPERG, P113; NILLES HP, 1984, PHYS REP, V110, P1, DOI 10.1016-0370-1573(84)90008-5; NILLES HP, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V124, P337, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)91467-3; NILLES HP, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V120, P346, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90460-4; OVRUT BA, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V119, P105, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90255-6; Polonyi J., 1977, FKI197793 U BUD; RAMOND P, 1971, PHYS REV D, V3, P2415, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.3.2415; ROSS GG, 1992, NUCL PHYS B, V377, P571, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(92)90302-R; Rubbia A, 2009, J PHYS CONF SER, V171, DOI 10.1088-1742-6596-171-1-012020; SAKAI N, 1981, Z PHYS C PART FIELDS, V11, P153, DOI 10.1007-BF01573998; SAKAI N, 1982, NUCL PHYS B, V197, P533, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(82)90457-6; SEN A, 1984, PHYS REV D, V30, P2608, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.30.2608; SONI SK, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V126, P215, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90593-2; STELLE KS, 1978, PHYS LETT B, V77, P376, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(78)90581-6; Tonelli G., COMMUNICATION; VOLKOV DV, 1972, JETP LETT+, V16, P438; WEINBERG S, 1982, PHYS REV D, V26, P287, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.26.287; WEINBERG S, 1976, PHYS LETT B, V62, P111, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(76)90062-9; WEINBERG S, 1982, PHYS REV LETT, V48, P1776, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.48.1776; WEINBERG S, 1983, PHYS REV LETT, V50, P387, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.50.387; WESS J, 1974, NUCL PHYS B, VB 70, P39, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(74)90355-1; WESS J, 1974, NUCL PHYS B, VB 78, P1, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(74)90112-6; WITTEN E, 1981, NUCL PHYS B, V188, P513, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(81)90006-7; WITTEN E, 1982, NUCL PHYS B, V202, P253, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(82)90071-2; YUAN TC, 1984, Z PHYS C PART FIELDS, V26, P407, DOI 10.1007-BF0145256733
Fluctuation of linear eigenvalue statistics of reverse circulant matrices with independent entries
No full textIn this article, we study the fluctuations of linear eigenvalue statistics of
reverse circulant matrices with independent entries which satisfy some
moment conditions. We show that obey
the central limit theorem (CLT) type result, where is a nice test
function.Comment: 18 pages, 3 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:2004.1129
Seismic Analysis of Open Ground Story Framed Building
No full textThe concept of open ground building (OGS) has taken its place in the Indian urban environment due to the fact that it provides the parking facility in the ground storey of the building. The cost of construction of this type of building is much less than that of a building with basement parking. Surveys of buildings failed in the past earthquakes show that this types of buildings are found to be one of the most vulnerable. The majority of buildings that failed during the Bhuj earthquake (2001) and Gujraat earthquake were of the OGS type. The collapse mechanism of such type of building is predominantly due to the formation of soft-storey in ground storey of the building. The sudden reduction in lateral stiffness and mass in the ground storey results in higher stresses in the columns of ground storey under seismic loading. In conventional design practice, the contribution of stiffness of infill walls present in upper storeys of OGS framed buildings are ignored in the structural modelling. Design based on such analysis, results in under-estimation of the bending moments and shear forces in the columns of ground storey. After Bhuj earthquake, IS 1893 code was revised in 2002, incorporating new design recommendations to address OGS framed buildings. According to this clause 7.10.3(a): “The columns and beams of the soft-storey are to be designed for the multiplication factor of 2.5 times the storey shears and moments calculated under seismic loads of bare frame”. The prescribed multiplication factor (MF) of 2.5, applicable for all OGS framed buildings, is proved to be fairly higher and suggests that all existing OGS buildings are highly vulnerable under seismic loading. The main objective of present study is the study of comparative performance of OGS buildings designed with various MFs using nonlinear analysis. As more realistic performance of the OGS building requires the modeling of stiffness and strength of the infill walls, hence they are also considered
Limiting spectral distribution of Toeplitz and Hankel matrices with dependent entries
No full textThis article deals with the limiting spectral distributions (LSD) of
symmetric Toeplitz and Hankel matrices with dependent entries. For any fixed
positive integer , we consider these matrices with entries
, where and are i.i.d. with mean zero and variance one. We provide
an explicit expression for the moment sequences of the LSDs. As a special case,
this article provides an alternate proof for the LSDs of these matrices when
the entries are i.i.d. with mean zero and variance one. The method is based on
the moment method. The idea of proof can also be applied to other patterned
random matrices, namely reverse circulant and symmetric circulant matrices.Comment: 13 pages, no figur
- …
