1,720,974 research outputs found
Usefulness of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in addition to mesalazine in maintaining remission in pediatric Crohn's disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
AIM: To assess the value of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) supplementation in addition to amino-salicylic-acid (5-ASA) in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD).
METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (20 males and 18 females, mean age 10.13 years, range 5-16 years) with CD in remission were randomized into two groups and treated for 12 mo. Group I (18 patients) received 5-ASA (50 mg/kg/d)+ omega-3 FAs as triglycerides in gastro-resistant capsules, 3 g/d (eicosapentanoic acid, EPA, 400 mg/g, docosahexaenoic acid, DHA, 200 mg/g). Group II (20 patients) received 5-ASA (50 mg/kg/d)+ olive oil placebo capsules. Patients were evaluated for fatty acid incorporation in red blood cell membranes by gas chromatography at baseline 6 and 12 mo after the treatment.
RESULTS: The number of patients who relapsed at 1 year was significantly lower in group I than in group II (P < 0.001). Patients in group I had a significant increase in the incorporation of EPA and DHA (P < 0.001) and a decrease in the presence of arachidonic acids.
CONCLUSION: Enteric-coated omega-3 FAs in addition to treatment with 5-ASA are effective in maintaining remission of pediatric CD
Bone demineralization in cystic fibrosis: Evidence of imbalance between bone formation and degradation
Bone turnover, collagen metabolism, and bone mineral status were investigated in 59 patients with cystic fibrosis and in 72 sex- and age-matched control subjects. In all patients and control subjects serum concentrations of osteocalcin (OC), carboxyterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), and cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), and urinary values of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX), as well as total body bone mineral content (TBBM) were measured. Higher ICTP (mu g/L) and NTX (bone collagen equivalent/urinary creatinine (nmol/mmol) values were found in prepubertal, pubertal, and young adult patients than in control subjects (ICTP: 15.4 +/- 2.1 and 13.2 +/- 1.8, p < 0.001; 23.3 +/- 5.3 and 20.1 +/- 4.1, p < 0.02; 4.8 +/- 1.1 and 4.0 +/- 1.0, p < 0.05, respectively; NTX: 1047.5 +/- 528.6 and 227.8 +/- 71.8,p < 0.01; 997.8 +/- 391.7 and 376.3 +/- 91.0, p < 0.01; 993.2 +/- 398.0 and 73.9 +/- 28.5, p < 0.01, respectively). Lower OC and PICP levels (mu g/L) were showed in pubertal patients in comparison with control subjects (OC: 20.2 +/- 12.3 and 39.0 +/- 15.1, p < 0.01; PICP: 305.8 +/- 130.4 and 436.2 +/- 110.1, p < 0.02, respectively). Lower OC and higher PIIINP levels (mu g/L) were found in young adult patients than in control subjects (OC: 4.4 +/- 3.0 and 7.0 +/- 3.1, p < 0.05; PIIINP: 4.8 +/- 1.1 and 3.1 +/- 1.0, p < 0.001, respectively). TBBM (z score) was reduced in prepubertal, pubertal, and young adult patients (-0.8 +/- 0.4, -1.0 +/- 0.4, -1.1 +/- 0.5, respectively). Patients with cystic fibrosis have bone demineralization and imbalance between bone formation and degradation
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
