1,721,065 research outputs found
[Long term treatment with acebutolol in hypertension (author's transl)]
No full textAcebutolol, a new cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, has been studied in 40 hypertensive patients (pts.) for a period of 6 months, 25 patients (group A) had never taken any antihypertensive agent, 15 pts. (group B) were previously treated with antihypertensives. This two groups are statistically different for the age (39.8 y. group A; 49.6 y. group B) for the values of basal blood pressure (BP) (175/105 mmHg group A; 197/114 mmHg group B) and for disease duration (9.9 months group A; 39.0 months group B). A significant antihypertensive response was obtained already at the 15th therapy day for the two groups, treated with acebutolol. Further, a little reduction of BP was obtained at the 3rd month going on with therapy; then the BP values showed non significant variation till the end of the study. Orthostatic hypotension were not remarked. After 3 months, acebutolol treatment 41% pts. rised diastolic BP (DBP) below 90 mmHg and 35% pts. had a DBP between 90 and 100 mmHg. The average values of heart rate have been significantly reduced after 15 days of therapy with sligh variations during the following month. The optimal mean daily dosages of the drug were obtained with titration in three months (540 mg/day group A and 740 mg/day group B). Regarding side effects rised during therapy, one patient showed "paradox hypertension" and another bradycardia which justified the interruption of the treatment. In our opinion, on the basis of the results obtained acebutolol shows a good efficacy in the treatment of hypertension and a very high tollerabilit
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Trends of smoking habits in Northern Italy (1986-1990) (WHO MONICA Project in Area Brianza)
No full textVariations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
