1,721,026 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Predictive value of biological markers for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with orthotopic liver transplantation.

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To help stratify candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), biomarkers are needed that are capable of predicting recurrence of disease (ROD). We investigated the prognostic role in this setting of immunohistochemical markers reported previously to predict poor prognosis in HCC patients treated with resection. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eighty-three patients with HCC who underwent OLT between 1987 and 2001 with a minimum clinical follow up of 12 months were included in this retrospective study. We analyzed immunohistochemical expression of the adhesion molecules E-cadherin and beta-catenin (membrane/nuclear localization), MIB-1 proliferative index and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27, alongside the main clinical-pathological variables. RESULTS: At univariate analysis, vascular thrombosis, high MIB-1 index, lower membrane expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin, and nuclear beta-catenin localization were associated with ROD. At multivariate analysis, only MIB-1 index, low equal E-cadherin (with respect to non-neoplastic surrounding tissue), and nuclear beta-catenin appeared as independent predictors of ROD. The logistic regression analysis model indicated that detection of any one parameter was associated with at least 88% estimated risk of ROD (up to 99% for all three). CONCLUSIONS: We propose these three molecular parameters as an additional tool for rational selection of OLT candidates among HCC patients (stratification according to the risk of ROD might help provide a similar life expectancy for cirrhotic candidates with and without HCC)

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore