1,721,033 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Enhancing android malware detection explainability through function call graph APIs

    No full text
    Nowadays, mobile devices are massively used in everyday activities. Thus, they contain sensitive data targeted by threat actors like bank accounts and personal information. Through the years, Machine Learning approaches have been proposed to identify malicious Android applications, but recent research highlights the need for better explanations for model decisions, as existing ones may not be related to the app’s malicious functionalities. This paper proposes an explainable approach based on static analysis to detect Android malware. The novelty lies in the specific analysis conducted to select and extract the features (i.e., APIs taken from the DEX Call Graph) that immediately provide meaningful explanations of the model functionality, thus allowing a significant correlation of the malware behavior with its family. Moreover, since we contain the number and type of features, the distinct impacts of each one appear more evident. The attained results show that it is possible to reach comparable results (in terms of accuracy) to existing state-of-the-art models while providing easy-to-understand explanations, which may yield significant insights into the malicious functionalities of the samples

    Oblivion: an open-source system for large-scale analysis of macro-based office malware

    Full text link
    Macro-based Office files have been extensively used as infection vectors to embed malware. In particular, VBA macros allow leveraging kernel functions and system routines to execute or remotely drop malicious payloads, and they are typically heavily obfuscated to make static analysis unfeasible. Current state-of-the-art approaches focus on discriminating between malicious and benign Office files by performing static and dynamic analysis directly on obfuscated macros, focusing mainly on detection rather than reversing. Namely, the proposed methods lack an in-depth analysis of the embedded macros, thus losing valuable information about the attack families, the embedded scripts, and the contacted external resources. In this paper, we propose Oblivion, an open-source framework for large-scale analysis of Office macros, to fill in this gap. Oblivion performs instrumentation of macros and executes them in a virtualized environment to de-obfuscate and reconstruct their behavior. Moreover, it can automatically and quickly interact with macros by extracting the embedded PowerShell and non-PowerShell attacks and reconstructing the whole macro behavior. This is the main scope of our analysis: we are more interested in retrieving specific behavioural patterns than detecting maliciousness per se. We performed a large-scale analysis of more than 30,000 files that constitute a representative corpus of attacks. Results show that Oblivion could efficiently de-obfuscate malicious macros by revealing a large corpus of PowerShell and non-PowerShell attacks. We measured that this efficiency can be quantified in an analysis time of less than 1 min per sample, on average. Moreover, we characterize such attacks by pointing out frequent attack patterns and employed obfuscation strategies. We finally release the information obtained from our dataset with our tool

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore