1,720,964 research outputs found
Combined 3 Tesla MRI biomarkers improve the differentiation between benign vs malignant single ring enhancing brain masses
No full textconventional and advanced MRI exams raw data of 14 patients affected by metastases, glioblastomas and abscesses
Combined 3 Tesla MRI biomarkers improve the differentiation between benign vs malignant single ring enhancing brain masses
No full textconventional and advanced MRI exams raw data of 14 patients affected by metastases, glioblastomas and abscesses
MR Imaging of Inner Ear Endo-perylinfatic Space at 3 Tesla after intratympanic Contrast Agent Administration in Definite Meniere's Disease
No full text
Chemoteratherapy-induced Tumor Pseudoprogression with Disease Progresssion. 3T Morphological MR follow-up in Anaplastic Astrocytoma
No full textRuolo della RM multimodale nella diagnosi differenziale tra recidiva tumorale ed esiti posttrattamento nei gliomi cerebrali operati: perfusione (PWI), spettroscopia (MRS), diffusione (DWI) e tensore di diffusione (DTI)
No full textCase 19 Stable Disease. 3T Morphofunctional MR follw-up in High-grade Oligodendroglioma.
No full textCase 28 Tumor Recurrence. 3T Morphofunctional MR Follow-up in Low-Grade Astrocytoma with Anaplastic Appearance
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
