1,723,736 research outputs found
Donald S. Murray Oral History
No full textAn oral history interview of military veteran Donald S. Murray originally conducted under the auspices of the Library of Congress Veterans History Project
Edwards, M S (Murray S), [No Service Number]
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/383518Surname: EDWarDS. Given Name(s) or Initials: M S (MURRAY S). Military Service Number or Last Known Location: [No Registration Number]. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 11621.223165
Item: [2016.0049.15811] "Edwards, M S (Murray S), [No Service Number]
S. Murray, The Collapse of the Mycenaean Economy (2017)
No full textZurbach Julien. S. Murray, The Collapse of the Mycenaean Economy (2017). In: Topoi, volume 21/2, 2017. pp. 483-485
H.M. Green, C.B. Christesen and S. Murray-Smith
No full textMedium: pen and inknot signed, not dated."H.M. Green, C.B. Christesen and S. Murray-Smith" [1980.2051.000.000], Kahan, LouisExtent: shee
S. Murray, Beauvais Cathedral, Architecture of Transcendence, Princeton, 1989
No full textSandron Dany. S. Murray, Beauvais Cathedral, Architecture of Transcendence, Princeton, 1989. In: Bulletin Monumental, tome 152, n°3, année 1994. pp. 376-378
S. Murray, Beauvais Cathedral, Architecture of Transcendence, Princeton, 1989
No full textSandron Dany. S. Murray, Beauvais Cathedral, Architecture of Transcendence, Princeton, 1989. In: Bulletin Monumental, tome 152, n°3, année 1994. pp. 376-378
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
