1,721,001 research outputs found
ACTIVE TECHNIQUES FOR REVEALING AND ANALYZING THE SECURITY OF HIDDEN SERVERS
In the last years we have witnessed a boom in the use of techniques and tools that provide anonymity. Such techniques and tools are used by clients that want their communication to stay anonymous or to access censored content, as well as by administrators to hide the location of their servers. All those activities can be easily performed with the support of an anonymity network. An important component of an anonymity network is the hidden server, a machine whose IP address is kept secret. Such hidden servers are the target of research in this thesis. More specifically, we focus on different types of hidden servers used in the Tor anonymity network. Tor hidden services (HSes) are anonymous services hosted in the Tor Network. The HS itself is a hidden server because users that connect to it are not aware of its IP address, and thus its location. Another equally important kind of hidden servers are Tor bridges. Bridges are entry nodes of the Tor Network, whose IP address is not publicly disclosed to avoid blocking traffic towards them. Bridges are meant to be used by clients that connect from countries where governments perform selective filtering over the contents that users can access, and for this reason governments try to block connections to those nodes. In this thesis we develop novel approaches and we implement them into techniques to analyze the security and reveal the location of hidden servers. This thesis comprises two parts, one dealing with HSes and the other one with bridges.
In the first part of the thesis, we develop a novel active approach for recovering the IP address of hidden servers that are used for hosting HSes. To this end, we design, implement, and evaluate a tool called Caronte that explores the content and configuration of a hidden service to automatically identify location leaks. Later those leaks are leveraged for trying to unveil the IP address of the hidden service. Our approach differs from previous ones, because Caronte does not rely on flaws in the Tor protocol and assumes an open-world model, i.e., it does not require a list of candidate servers known in advance. A final validation iistep guarantees that all the candidates that are false positives (i.e., they are not hosting the hidden service) are discarded. We demonstrate Caronte by running it on real HSes and successfully deanonymizing over 100 of them.
In the second part of the thesis we perform the first systematic study of the Tor bridge infrastructure. Our study covers both the public bridge infrastructure available to all Tor users, and the previously unreported private bridge infrastructure, comprising private nodes for the exclusive use of those who know about their existence. Our analysis of the public infrastructure is twofold. First, we examine the security implications of the public data accessible from the CollecTor service. This service collects and publishes detailed information and statistics about core elements of the Tor Network. Despite the fact that CollecTor anonymizes sensitive data (e.g., IP or emails of bridge owners) prior to its publication, we identify several pieces of information that may be detrimental for the security of public bridges. Then, we measure security relevant properties of public bridges, including their lifetime and how often they change IP and port. Our results show how the public bridge ecosystem with clients is stable and those bridges rarely change their IP address. This has consequences for the current blocking policies that governments are using to restrict access to the anonymity network, because more aggressive strategies could be adopted. We also show how the presence of multiple transport protocols could harm bridge anonymity (since the adversary becomes able to identify the bridge through the weakest protocol). To study the private bridge infrastructure, we use an approach to discover 694 private bridges on the Internet and a novel technique, that leverages additional services running on bridges, to track bridges across IP changes. During this process, we identify the existence of infrastructures that use private proxies to forward traffic to backend bridges or relays. Finally, we discuss the security implications of our findings
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Certified PUPP: abuse in authenticode code signing
Code signing is a solution to verify the integrity of software and its publisher’s identity, but it can be abused by malware and potentially unwanted programs (PUP) to look benign. This work performs a systematic analysis of Windows Authenticode code signing abuse, evaluating the effectiveness of existing defenses by certification authorities. We identify a problematic scenario in Authenticode where timestamped signed malware successfully validates even after the revocation of their code signing certificate. We propose hard revocations as a solution. We build an infrastructure that
automatically analyzes potentially malicious executables, selects those signed, clusters them into operations, determines if they are PUP or malware, and produces a certificate blacklist. We use our infrastructure to evaluate 356 K samples from 2006-2015. Our analysis shows that most signed samples are PUP (88%-95%) and that malware is not commonly signed (5%–12%). We observe PUP
rapidly increasing over time in our corpus. We measure the effectiveness of CA defenses such as identity checks and revocation, finding that 99.8% of signed PUP and 37% of signed malware use CA-issued certificates and only 17% of malware certificates and 15% of PUP certificates have been revoked. We observe most revocations lack an accurate revocation reason. We analyze the code
signing infrastructure of the 10 largest PUP operations exposing that they heavily use file and certificate polymorphism and that 7 of them have multiple certificates revoked. Our infrastructure also generates a certificate blacklist 9x larger than current ones
- …
