1,721,116 research outputs found

    Presentazione del libro "La guerra capitalista. Competizione, centralizzazione, nuovo conflitto imperialista", di E. Brancaccio, R. Giammetti e S. Lucarelli, Mimesis ediz., 2022

    No full text
    Introduzione alla Presentazione del libro di E. Brancaccio, R. Giammetti e S. Lucarelli, “La guerra capitalista. Competizione, centralizzazione, nuovo conflitto imperialista”, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 10 gennaio 202

    L’Unione europea tra globalizzazione, neo-regionalismo e federalismo

    No full text
    La ricerca, avviata nel 2002, si è occupata dell'UE in epoca di globalizzazione ed ha inizialmente prodotto il volume: S. Lucarelli (a cura di), La Polis europea. L’Unione europea oltre l’Euro, Asterios, Trieste, 2003. Poi ha prodotto il volume: S. Lucarelli, Ian Manners (a cura di), Values and Principles in European Foreign Policy, London, Routledge, 2006. (descrizione allegata alla scheda relativa a questa pubblicazione

    Public debate and the European Convention

    No full text
    La ricerca (2003-2005) si è occupata del dibattito pubblico sull'UE nei paesi dell'Europa del sud, durante la Convenzione europea. Ha condotto alla pubblicazione: S. Lucarelli, Claudio Radaelli (a cura di), Mobilising Politics and Society? The EU Convention’s Impact on Southern Europe, Special Issue of South European Society & Politics, 9(1) 2004. Volume omonimo: London, Routledge, 2005

    Newsletter Italian Foreign Policy

    No full text
    Newsletter on-line del sito foreignpolicy.it c.a. 4 numeri l'anno con 4 o più contributi ciascuno e una "Editorial note" della responsabile. Numeri della rivista editi da S. Lucarelli: NEWSLETTER N. 7 (JANUARY 2008) (http://foreignpolicy.it/cgi-bin/news/adon.cgi?act=doc&sid=4&doc=3271) NEWSLETTER N. 6 (NOVEMBER 2007) (http://foreignpolicy.it/cgi-bin/news/adon.cgi?act=doc&sid=4&doc=3189) NEWSLETTER N.5 (JUNE 2007) (http://foreignpolicy.it/cgi-bin/news/adon.cgi?act=doc&sid=4&doc=2842) NEWSLETTER N.4 (MARCH 2007) (http://foreignpolicy.it/cgi-bin/news/adon.cgi?act=doc&sid=4&doc=2680) NEWSLETTER N.3 (DECEMBER 2006) (http://foreignpolicy.it/cgi-bin/news/adon.cgi?act=doc&sid=4&doc=2442

    Basic Income and Productivity in Cognitive Capitalism

    No full text
    In this article basic income (BI) will not be considered as a measure to raise living standards and social well-being. Rather, it will be presented as an indispensable structural policy for achieving a healthier social order governed by a more equitable compromise between capital and labour. Embracing the French Regulation School approach, we shall maintain that such a compromise is founded on the redistribution of productivity gains. Describing the dynamics of productivity will enable a better understanding of the main features and development of contemporary capitalism. In advancing our argument, we shall focus on the socio-economic transformation that has overtaken the Fordist paradigm within Western countries and propose the term Cognitive Capitalism to describe the new economic system. We shall address the relationship between the exploitation of knowledge and the accumulation of surplus, pointing out that such a process is based on the exploitation of dynamic scale economies. We shall argue that BI can be seen as a viable economic policy able to contrast the instability generated by the present form(s) of accumulation, as it increases productivity, through network and learning processes

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore