1,720,957 research outputs found
CONCORSO INTERNAZIONALE DI IDEE Il Divenire dell’Europa, Idee architettoniche, creative ed artistiche per la conservazione del futuro dell’Europa
No full textLa Commissione di valutazione è composta da:
Stefan Behnisch (Architetto, Behnisch Architekten);
Dennis Crompton (Architetto, Archigram);
Gabriele Del Mese (Ingegnere, consulente Arup);
Maria Angela Falà (Vice presidente di Atelier PAEMA);
Ruggero Lenci (Architetto, RL Space Lab);
Carme Pinós (Architetto, Estudio Carme Pinós);
Luigi Prestinenza Puglisi (Architetto, Presidente Associazione Italiana di Architettura e Critica);
Franco Purini (Architetto Studio Purini-Thermes);
Adèle Naudé Santos (Architetto, Preside della Facoltà di Architettura ed Urban Planning al MIT);
Claudio Strinati (Critico d’Arte).
Il Comitato Scientifico è composto da: Achille Albonetti, Serena Angioli, Giovanni Baiocchi, Pier Virgilio Dastoli, Franco Luccichenti, Guido Napoletano, Paolo Palomba, Luisella Pavan Woolfe, Lucrezia Reichlin, Amedeo Schiattarella, Luca Zevi
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
The Europe's become, Il divenire dell'Europa
No full textCatalogo del concorso internazionale sul divenire dell'Europa.
Commissione giudicatrice:
Ruggero Lenci (presidente),
Maria Angela Falà (segretaria),
Stefan Behnisch,
Dennis Crompton,
Gabriele Del Mese,
Carme Pinós,
Luigi Prestinenza Puglisi,
Franco Purini.
Adèle Naudé Santos,
Claudio Strinati.It is in this perspective that the Association Atelier PAEMA calls for design ideas that are architectural, creative, artistic; and simultaneously lead to a synthesis of the European values and interpretations for the past, present, and future: what the European cultural heritage has represented, what it is now, what we hope it will become and how all this can be expressed in a symbol, in a function, in a place.
In a time of severe and prolonged global economic crisis, when there is a high risk to impoverish the European cultural dimension, the present International design competition seeks to counter this trend and aims at providing visibility to the positive elements that underlie the European identity, the process of integration and its cultural value. Coherent with this vision, Atelier PAEMA proposes to give visibility to Europe, even in a symbolic way, in order to convey the many meanings belonging to its citizens and territories (historical, philosophical, scientific, literary, architectural, humanistic, creative, artistic, economical, social, spiritual, ethical, etc.). The goal is to help re-launch the European values, the consciousness of a shared destiny that, besides the foundation of peace and security, might offer a common horizon pointing Europeans the path to be undertaken, also by recognizing its value and expressing its evolution.
Music is the universal language. The anthem of European Community, “The hymn to Joy” by Beethoven, symbolizes the spirit of Europe and brotherhood between men. It summarizes the ideal of freedom, peace and solidarity pursued by Europe. Similarly, this ideas competition intends to reward a concrete symbol, an expression of the universal shared values in which Europeans can recognize themselves.
A highly functional artistic-design-cultural vision, therefore, requires the competitors to synthesize the exceptional and unique cultural heritage, both material and nonmaterial, which Europe has maintained during the time and will project in the future. The competition requires participants to express an “ideal symbol” of Europe, and to propose an area to place it. The design idea can be seen as an expression of architecture, art, landscape, urban design, engineering, or as a combination of them, having the “status” of “place of public interest”. It should, moreover, possess functions and usability of public utility, for example, an open area, a green space, a park, a shoreline, a promontory, a square, an existing building reconverted.
The design idea should then be based on a multidisciplinary creation that brings to a synthesis of ideas enabling to express cultural and thematic plurality that characterize European identity. It will inherently work as an ‘Attractor-Diffuser' of European cultural identity, in form and content, to show the ability to project our outstanding Historical past built on beauty and civilization in the future. At the same time it will also work for regenerating ethical, aesthetic and cultural values hence establishing a reference point which can be functional and highly symbolic at once, in order to give life to the very first “free clod” of Europe.
Evaluation Commission
Stefan Behnisch (Architect, Behnisch Architekten);
Dennis Crompton (Architect, Archigram);
Gabriele Del Mese (Engineer, Arup consultant);
Mariangela Falà (Vice President of Atelier PAEMA);
Ruggero Lenci (Architect, RL Space Lab);
Carme Pinós (Architect, Estudio Carme Pinós);
Luigi Prestinenza Puglisi (Architect, President of AIAC, Italian Assoc. of Architecture and Critic);
Franco Purini (Architect, Studio Purini-Thermes);
Adèle Naudé Santos (Architect, Dean of the School of Architecture and Urban Planning at MIT);
Claudio Strinati (Art Critic);
An architect designated or approved by UIA (International Union of Architects)
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
