1,722,942 research outputs found

    S, Graham

    No full text

    Sanford Bates Correspondence to John S. Graham

    No full text
    A letter addressed to John S. Graham from Austin MacCormick concerning a new minimum security penitentiary

    Sanford Bates Correspondence to John S. Graham

    No full text
    A letter addressed to John S. Graham concerning a minimum security penitentiary

    Sanford Bates Correspondence from John S. Graham

    No full text
    A letter and accompanying envelope from John S. Graham and addressed to Sanford Bates. The letter concerns a new minimum security penitentiary

    Sanford Bates Correspondence to John S. Graham Page 1

    No full text
    The first page of a letter addressed to John S. Graham concerning a minimum security penitentiary

    Sanford Bates Correspondence to John S. Graham Page 2

    No full text
    The second page of a letter addressed to John S. Graham concerning a minimum security penitentiary

    Major B. S. Graham

    No full text
    Major B. S. Graham is formerly the vice president and chief of operations in Oklahoma for the Curtiss-Wright Flying Service. He assumed duties as a technical advisor in Fort Worth, Texas for the Bennett Aircraft Corporation. Major Graham enlisted in the Army in 1917 and trained with the French overseas. He saw action in World War I and was wounded by a German aircraft. Major Graham is posed in front of a wall. He is dressed in a three piece suit. Published in The Fort Worth Star-Telegram Evening Edition February 01, 1940.https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_startelegram1940s/1657/thumbnail.jp

    Sanford Bates Correspondence from John S. Graham Letter

    No full text
    A letter from John S. Graham and addressed to Sanford Bates concerning a new minimum security penitentiary

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore