1,720,956 research outputs found
Lignocellulosic biowastes as carrier material and slow release electron donor for sulphidogenesis of wastewater in an inverse fluidized bed bioreactor
Industrial wastewaters containing high concentrations of sulphate, such as those generated by mining, metallurgical and mineral processing industries, require electron donor for biological sulfidogenesis. In this study, five types of lignocellulosic biowastes were characterized as potential low-cost slow release electron donors for application in a continuously operated sulphidogenic inverse fluidized bed bioreactor (IFBB). Among them, natural scourer and cork were selected due to their high composition of volatile solids (VS), viz. 89.1 and 96.3%, respectively. Experiments were performed in batch (47 days) and in an IFBB (49 days) using synthetic sulphate-rich wastewater. In batch, the scourer gave higher sulphate reduction rates (67.7 mg SO42- L-1 day-1) in comparison to cork (12.1 mg SO42- L-1 day-1), achieving >82% sulphate reduction efficiencies. In the IFBB packed with the natural scourer, the average sulphate reduction efficiency was 24 (±17)%, while the volumetric sulphate reduction rate was 167 (±117) mg SO42-L-1 day-1. The long incubation time in the batch experiments (47 days) allowed higher sulphate reduction efficiencies in comparison to the short hydraulic retention time (24 h) in the IFBB. This suggests the hydrolysis-fermentation was the rate-limiting step and the electron donor supply (through hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic biowaste) was limiting the sulphate reduction. Lignocellulose as carrier material and slow release electron donor for sulphidogenesis
Hydrodynamics and mathematical modelling in a low HRT inverse fluidized-bed reactor for biological sulphate reduction
Biological reduction of sulphate at low hydraulic retention time (HRT) is presented in this paper. A sulphidogenic inverse fluidized-bed bioreactor (IFBB) was operated successfully at a progressively decreasing HRT from 1 to 0.125 days for a total of 155 days. Synthetic wastewater containing sulphate at a concentration of 745 (± 17) mg/L was used. COD was supplied as lactate in variable concentrations at COD/SO4 2− ratios of 1.2–2.4. The pH of the feed ranged between 5.2 and 6.2. The highest measured removal rates were 2646 and 4866 mg SO4 2−/L day at an HRT of 0.25 and 0.125 days, respectively, using a COD/SO4 2− ratio of 2.3. The biological sulphate reduction was limited by the influent COD concentrations at a COD/SO4 2− ratio < 2.3. The IFBB ensured biomass retention at a maximum liquid residence time of θ = 3.84 (± 0.013), according to the residence time distribution analysis. Hydrodynamic studies were carried out at recirculation rates of 0, 200, 300, 350, 400, and 500 L/h to measure the relative bed expansion, the mixing pattern, and the fluidization characteristics of the reactor. A dynamic model is also developed based on COD and sulphate as the two limiting substrates in a Monod-type kinetic equation describing the kinetics of lactate oxidation by SRB. A set of the following parameters YVSS/COD′ = 0.23 mg COD of VSS/mg lactate, μmax = 1.758 day− 1, KCOD = 956 mg COD of lactate/L, KSO4 = 316 mg SO4 2−/L, kd = 0.024 day− 1, tres = 5.7 days, and kexchange = 0.4 day− 1 simulated adequately the residual effluent COD and sulphate concentrations, the produced sulphide concentration as well as the pH of the IFBB effluent. Low HRT values, shown efficient in this study, are prerequisite for industrial applicability and economic feasibility of the sulphur reduction process. In addition, the developed model can be used for optimum experimental design and further process upscale and development
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
