1,720,954 research outputs found
G-control Charts for Contamination Rates of Blood Cultures in a University Hospital
Objective: To determine blood culture contamination rates, and display with a g-chart.
Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients, from whom blood cultures were obtained in a university hospital, during January and December 2019 were retrieved and reviewed for contamination. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria were used to classify the blood culture results. The contamination rates were illustrated with a g-chart.
Results: We identified 331 false-positive blood cultures, among 32,961 cultured specimens; yielding a contamination rate of 1.0% (95%CI = 0.9% – 1.1%). The highest contamination events occurred in the Emergency department (49.2%), Pediatric ICU (5.2%) and Neonatal ICU (4.8%), respectively. The most common commensal bacterial genus were Staphylococcus coagulase negative (67.1%), Bacillus spp. (10.2%) and Corynebacterium spp. (7.6%), correspondingly. The g-charts could identify 14 abnormal variations, in 41 locations.
Conclusion: The contamination rates found were within ranges of other reports. G-charts are simple to construct, easy to interpret and sensitive for detection of real time epidemics
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Hemodialysis-Related Infections: A 4-Year Surveillance
Objective: To analyze the results from the surveillance of hemodialysis-related infections.
Material and Methods: Data was prospectively gathered from outpatients attending a hemodialysis unit from April 2019 until March 2023. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Dialysis Event Surveillance was used to identify three types of infection-related dialysis events. Event rates were calculated and stratified by vascular access type, standardized infection ratios for bloodstream infections (BSI), intravenous antimicrobial starts, and described pathogens identified among BSI.
Results: A total of 2,288 patient-month follow-ups were included. There were 79 infection-related dialysis events (24 BSI; 46 intravenous antimicrobial starts, nine pus, redness, or increased swelling at the vascular access site). The incidence of BSI per 100 patient-months was 1.05 (0.59 arteriovenous fistula, 0.83 arteriovenous graft, and 2.22 central venous catheter). Seventeen BSI were vascular access-related. Access-related BSI per 100 patient-months was 0.74 (0.39 arteriovenous fistula, 0.41 arteriovenous graft, and 1.85 central venous catheter). Intravenous antimicrobial starts per 100 patient-months was 2.01 (0.98 arteriovenous fistula, 2.62 arteriovenous graft, and 3.14 central venous catheter). Most events occurred in patients with a central venous catheter. When benchmarked with the 2014 NHSN, the standardized infection ratio of BSI, access-related BSI, and intravenous antimicrobial starts were 1.40, 1.26, and 0.55, respectively. The most serious outcome was BSI; resulting in 83.3% hospitalizations, 25% loss of vascular access, and 15.8% deaths.
Conclusion: Surveillance of infection-related dialysis events is important for prevention. These events were highest among patients with a central venous catheter compared with other vascular access types
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
