1,720,987 research outputs found

    Coaction to recognition. Logic of obedience in Rudolph Sohm

    Get PDF
    L’articolo si propone di realizzare una panoramica sul pensiero del giurista luterano Rudolph Sohm, ponendo in evidenza i cambi di rotta nell’itinerario seguito dalla sua riflessione scientifica, che si realizza nel corso di lunghi anni, tra la fine del secolo XIX e gli inizi del secolo XX.The aim of this article is to give an overview of the thought of the Lutheran jurist Rudolph Sohm, by highlighting the changes of course in the itinerary of his scientific reflection, which has been developed during many years, between the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century.Ciencias ReligiosasDerech

    Lex Ribuaria et Lex Francorum Chamavorum..., par Rudolph Sohm.

    No full text
    Havet Julien. Lex Ribuaria et Lex Francorum Chamavorum..., par Rudolph Sohm.. In: Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes. 1884, tome 45. pp. 202-203

    Lex Ribuaria et Lex Francorum Chamavorum..., par Rudolph Sohm.

    No full text
    Havet Julien. Lex Ribuaria et Lex Francorum Chamavorum..., par Rudolph Sohm.. In: Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes. 1884, tome 45. pp. 202-203

    Coazione al Riconoscimento. La logica dell’obbedienza in Rudolph Sohm

    Get PDF
    The aim of this article is to give an overview of the thought of the Lutheran jurist Rudolph Sohm, by highlighting the changes of course in the itinerary of his scientific reflection, which has been developed during many years, between the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century

    Rudolph Sohm and his influences of the definition of the law of property in the Middle Ages. A reinterpretation of ownership in Transylvania (1308-1342)

    Get PDF
    This article addresses firstly the terminological problems modern historians encounter when discussing the law of property in the Middle Ages, and how its decontextualization has led to numerous inaccurate studies in the field of legal history, and secondly it is dedicated to Rudolph Sohm and his interpretation of the law of property and how his idea of institutional law can be applied to the medieval institutions of Transylvania in the early 14th century. Rudolph Sohm considers in his work Outlines of Church History that in the Middle Ages, society was composed of only two classes, the nobility and the clergy. They alone possessed property and they alone ruled. He describes landed property as the only kind of property recognized in that period. It is interesting to investigate in light of recent studies how political authority went hand in hand with the possession of land, and how were the classes defined by Sohm identified with and within the nation or the realm. His classification is still used by many Hungarian and Romanian historians, and we argue against the use of the modern concept of property and offer a new definition for the numerous and various types of possession we encounter. Was the history of the nation their history? What defines the society in the Middle Ages? Is Sohm’s definition of medieval property still functional correlated with the new developments in legal history? These are several questions that this research aims to answer by investigating the roman and medieval terminology used to define possession and nobility in 13th and 14th century Transylvania.Questo articolo riguarda, in primo luogo, i problemi terminologici per gli storici moderni quando si discute la legge della proprietà nel Medioevo, e come la decontestualizzazione ha creato numerosi studi erronati nel campo della storia del diritto, e in secondo luogo è dedicata a Rudolph Sohm e la sua interpretazione di la legge della proprietà e di come la sua idea di legge può essere applicata alle istituzioni medievali della Transilvania nei primi anni del 14° secolo. Rudolph Sohm considera, nella sua opera Outlines of Church History, che nel Medioevo, la società era composta da solo due classi, la nobiltà e il clero. Solo loro possedevano proprietà e solo loro governati. Egli descrive la proprietà fondiaria come l'unico tipo di proprietà riconosciuto in quel periodo. E 'interessante indagare alla luce di recenti studi come l'autorità politica è andato di pari passo con il possesso della terra, e di come sono state le classi definite da Sohm identificato con e all'interno della nazione o il regno. La sua classificazione è ancora utilizzato da molti storici ungheresi e rumene, e ci sostengono contro l'uso del moderno concetto di proprietà e offrire una nuova definizione per i numerosi e vari tipi di possesso che incontriamo. Era la storia della nazione loro storia? Ciò che definisce la società nel Medioevo? È la definizione di Sohm di struttura medievale ancora funzionali correlati con i nuovi sviluppi nella storia del diritto? Queste sono alcune domande che questa ricerca si propone di rispondere indagando la terminologia romana e medievale utilizzato per definire il possesso e nobiltà nel 13 ° e 14 ° secolo la Transilvania.Ciencias ReligiosasDerech

    Rudolph Sohm

    No full text

    Festgabe der Leipziger Juristenfakultät für Karl Binding zum 7. August 1913.

    No full text
    Struktur de Strafprozesses / von Adolf Wach.--Weltliches und geistliches Recht / von Rudolph Sohm.--Schuldpflicht und Haftung / von Emil Strohal.Mode of access: Internet

    Rudolph Sohm (1841-1917)

    No full text

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore