1,721,170 research outputs found
W cieniu "Zdania" - o prasie krakowskiej lewicy 1989–2000
Get PDF[In the shadow of "Zdanie" - a left-wing political press in Cracow 1989-2000]. Discusses the development of the political press of the left-wing orientation, issued in Cracow, 1989-2000
The Strelau Temperament Inventory - Revised (STI-R): validity studies
Get PDFRuch W, Angleitner A, Strelau J. The Strelau Temperament Inventory - Revised (STI-R): validity studies. European journal of personality. 1991;5(4):287-308
A review of Katarzyna Pokorna-Ignatowicz, Robotnicza Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza „Prasa–Książka–Ruch” w polskim systemie medialnym [Workers’ Publishing Cooperative ‘Press–Book– Movement’ in the Polish Media System], Kraków 2016
No full textA review of Katarzyna Pokorna-Ignatowicz, Robotnicza Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza „Prasa–Książka–Ruch” w polskim systemie medialnym [Workers’ Publishing Cooperative ‘Press–Book– Movement’ in the Polish Media System], Kraków 2016Artykuł recenzyjny nt. monografii: Katarzyna Pokorna-Ignatowicz, Robotnicza Spółdzielnia, Wydawnicza „Prasa–Książka–Ruch” w polskim systemie medialnym, Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego, Kraków 2016, 264 s
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
PhoPhiKat-45
No full textDas Verfahren wurde für den Einsatz bei Erwachsenen ab 18 Jahren konstruiert, es gibt jedoch auch Versionen für Kinder (ab 6;0) und Jugendliche (ab 13;0). Es werden drei Dispositionen mit je 15 Items erfasst, die in Zusammenhang mit dem Lachen, Auslachen und Ausgelachtwerden stehen: Angst vor dem Ausgelachtwerden (Gelotophobie), die Freude daran, ausgelacht zu werden (Gelotophilie) und die Freude daran, andere auszulachen (Katagelastizismus). Die Entwicklung des Verfahrens stützt sich auf die Definition von Gelotophilie und Katagelastizismus von Ruch und Proyer (2009) und deren Untersuchungen zur Gelotophobie. Reliabilität: Es liegen mittlere Trennschärfen von rit = .58, rit = .52 und rit = .46 für Gelotophobie, Gelotophilie und Katagelastizismus und interne Konsistenzen zwischen Cronbachs Alpha = .84 und Alpha = .88 vor. Test-Retestkorrelationen (3 und 6 Monate) liegen zwischen rtt = .73 und rtt = .86. Validität: Eine Faktorenanalyse der Items und die Interkorrelation der Skalen unterstützen die Konstruktvalidität. Es liegen zahlreiche weitere Befunde zur Validität vor. Normen: Es existieren Vergleichsstichproben sowie empirisch abgeleitete Cut-off-Werte für die Gelotophobie-Skala.The measure has been designed for use with adults aged 18 and over, but there are also versions for children (from 6;0) and adolescents (from 13;0). Three dispositions with 15 items each are assessed, which are related to laughing, laughing at somebody and being laughed at: Fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia), the joy of being laughed at (gelatophilia) and the joy of laughing at others (cataract elasticity). The development of the method is based on the definition of gelotophilia and catagelasticism by Ruch and Proyer (2009) and their research on gelotophobia. Reliability: There are mean selectivities of rit = .58, rit = .52 and rit = .46 for gelatophobia, geotophilia and catagelasticism and internal consistencies between Cronbach's alpha = .84 and alpha = .88. Test-retest correlations (3 and 6 months) are between rtt = .73 and rtt = .86. Validity: A factor analysis of the items and the intercorrelation of the scales support the construct validity. There are numerous other findings on validity. Norms : There are comparative samples as well as empirically derived cut-off values for the gelotophobia scale.reviewedpublishedVersio
Sprawozdanie z ogólnopolskiej konferencji naukowej "Ruch w języku - język w ruchu", Katowice, 28 listopada 2011
Get PDFW dniu 28 listopada 2011 roku odbyła się ogólnopolska konferencja naukowa Ruch w języku – język w ruchu, organizowana przez Instytut Języka Polskiego Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Wzięli w niej udział doktoranci oraz
młodsi pracownicy naukowi z siedmiu krajowych ośrodków akademickich – Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, Uniwersytetu
Warszawskiego, Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego oraz Politechniki Wrocławskiej. Wystąpień prelegentów wysłuchali licznie zgromadzeni pracownicy Instytutu Języka Polskiego Uniwersytetu
Śląskiego, biorący czynny udział w dyskusjach wieńczących każdą z czterech części konferencji, oraz studenci Wydziału Filologicznego. Celem konferencji była refleksja nad problematyką ruchu w języku (rozumianą jako leksykalne i frazeologiczne sposoby wyrażania ruchu, czasowniki ruchu w aspekcie gramatycznym i glottodydaktycznym) oraz języka w ruchu (dotyczącą zmian systemowych i komunikacyjnych dokonujących
się w języku dawniej i współcześnie, obserwowalnych tendencji rozwojowych polszczyzny, przesunięć semantycznych, zmian w zakresie normy językowej itp.)
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
