1,721,017 research outputs found

    Pulmonary arterial hypertension: a look to the future.

    No full text
    The Third World Symposium on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension served not only as a forum for the presentation of state-of-the art overviews of the pathobiologic and clinical aspects of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but also afforded an opportunity to the international scientific community to explore future directions of research and collaboration. This summary provides a brief overview of future directions in the field

    Long-term outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients treated with treprostinil.

    No full text
    Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is fatal if untreated. Intravenous epoprostenol improves exercise capacity and hemodynamics in PAH, and increases survival in idiopathic PAH (IPAH). To evaluate the effects of subcutaneous (SC) treprostinil, a longer acting prostacyclin analogue, followed by the addition of other PAH therapies if needed, we followed 860 PAH patients treated with SC treprostinil for up to 4 years.Survival is reported as Kaplan-Meier estimates; for 332 IPAH patients with baseline hemodynamics, observed survival is also compared with predicted survival, using the NIH formula.Of the total 860 patients, 199 (23%) discontinued due to AEs, 136 (16%) died, 117 (14%) discontinued due to deterioration, 29 (3%) withdrew consent and 11 (1%) underwent transplantation. 97 patients (11%) switched from SC treprostinil to an alternative prostacyclin analogue; bosentan was added in 105 patients (12%) and sildenafil in 25 patients (3%).Survival was 87%-68% over 1-4 years for all 860 patients and 88%-70% over 1-4 years with SC treprostinil monotherapy. For the IPAH subset with baseline hemodynamics (n=332), 91%-72% over 1-4 years; in contrast, predicted survival was 69%-38% over 1-4 years. The safety profile for long-term SC treprostinil was consistent with previous short-term trials with no unexpected AEs

    Treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease.

    No full text
    STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of continuous subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil, a stable prostacyclin analogue, for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD). DESIGN: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective trials of treprostinil vs placebo in 470 patients with PAH. PATIENTS: A subset of 90 patients with PAH and CTD, including systemic lupus erythematosus, diffuse scleroderma, limited scleroderma, and mixed CTD/overlap syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either treprostinil (initiated at 1.25 ng/kg/min, and titrated upward) or placebo via continuous subcutaneous infusion. The maximum dose of treprostinil allowed was 22.5 ng/kg/min. MEASUREMENTS: Six-minute walk (6MW) distance and dyspnea-fatigue scores were determined at baseline, and at 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Hemodynamic measures were obtained at baseline and at 12 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, most patients had New York Heart Association class III symptoms. The mean baseline 6MW distance was 289 m (range, 60 to 448 m). The mean dose of treprostinil at week 12 was 8.4 ng/kg/min (range, 1.25 to 17.5 ng/kg/min). After 12 weeks, the change in cardiac index from baseline was + 0.2 +/- 0.08 L/min/m(2) in the treprostinil group and - 0.07 +/- 0.07 L/min/m(2) in the placebo group (p = 0.007). The pulmonary vascular resistance index decreased by 4 +/- 2 U x m(2) in the treprostinil group and increased by 1 +/- 1 U x m(2) in the placebo group (p = 0.006). The placebo-corrected median improvement from baseline in 6MW distance was 25 m in treprostinil-treated patients (p = 0.055); this improvement appeared to be dose related. Dyspnea fatigue scores also improved in the treprostinil group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.014). Adverse events included infusion site pain and typical side effects related to prostaglandins, and were tolerated by most patients. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil in patients with PAH associated with CTD improved exercise capacity, symptoms of PAH, and hemodynamics

    Current and future management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension:from diagnosis to treatment responses

    No full text
    Although pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) has been proven a very effective treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, it cannot be performed in a substantial proportion of patients. Here, we outline a proposed treatment algorithm, outlining therapeutic alternatives: (1) PEA should be considered as the first treatment option, where possible; (2) medical intervention is a possible option in inoperable patients and those with significant arteriopathy, although only chronic anticoagulation has been widely used to date (advanced medical treatment options could include prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists, or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, but randomized clinical trials are required); (3) pulmonary hypertension is likely to persist after PEA in patients with significant small-vessel arteriopathy, resulting in poor clinical outcome and increased perioperative mortality (medical therapy could also be applied here); (4) anticoagulation therapy and, possibly, advanced medical treatment with careful monitoring may provide benefits in patients with mild or asymptomatic disease; (5) if medical therapy begins to fail, PEA should be offered without delay to avoid progression to severe, secondary arteriopathy; (6) in the absence of severe comorbidity, lung transplantation may be undertaken where PEA has failed, in nonresponders to medical therapy, and in patients with progressive arteriopathy; (7) in patients not eligible for PEA due to collateral and/or surgically inaccessible lesions, balloon angioplasty may be a possible alternative at some centers, but is experimental and requires further assessment. Continued research and clinical trials investigating possible applications of new medical treatments are required

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore