1,721,044 research outputs found
Fig. 3 in Cranial Anatomy of Citipati osmolskae (Theropoda, Oviraptorosauria), and a Reinterpretation of the Holotype of Oviraptor philoceratops
No full textFig. 3. Palatal view of the holotype cranium of Citipati osmolskae IGM 100/978. Abbreviations in appendix 1.Published as part of CLARK, JAMES M., NORELL, MARK A. & ROWE, TIMOTHY, 2002, Cranial Anatomy of Citipati osmolskae (Theropoda, Oviraptorosauria), and a Reinterpretation of the Holotype of Oviraptor philoceratops, pp. 1-24 in American Museum Novitates 3364 on page 7, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2002)3642.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/473483
A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda)
No full textNorell, Mark A., Makovicky, Peter J., Bever, Gabe S., Balanoff, Amy M., Clark, James M., Barsbold, Rinchen, Rowe, Timothy (2009): A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda). American Museum Novitates 3654: 1-64, DOI: 10.1206/648.1, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1206/648.
Fig. 20 in A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda)
No full textFig. 20. Partial left pes of Saurornithoides mongoliensis (AMNH FR 6516) in right lateral (A), left lateralPublished as part of Norell, Mark A., Makovicky, Peter J., Bever, Gabe S., Balanoff, Amy M., Clark, James M., Barsbold, Rinchen & Rowe, Timothy, 2009, A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda), pp. 1-64 in American Museum Novitates 3654 on page 25, DOI: 10.1206/648.1, http://zenodo.org/record/535741
Fig. 15 in A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda)
No full textFig. 15. Ventral (A) and left lateral (B) views of the four preserved sacral vertebrae of Saurornithoides mongoliensis (AMNH FR 6516). Anterior is to the left.Published as part of Norell, Mark A., Makovicky, Peter J., Bever, Gabe S., Balanoff, Amy M., Clark, James M., Barsbold, Rinchen & Rowe, Timothy, 2009, A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda), pp. 1-64 in American Museum Novitates 3654 on page 20, DOI: 10.1206/648.1, http://zenodo.org/record/535741
Fig. 15 in A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda)
No full textFig. 15. Ventral (A) and left lateral (B) views of the four preserved sacral vertebrae of Saurornithoides mongoliensis (AMNH FR 6516). Anterior is to the left.Published as part of Norell, Mark A., Makovicky, Peter J., Bever, Gabe S., Balanoff, Amy M., Clark, James M., Barsbold, Rinchen & Rowe, Timothy, 2009, A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda), pp. 1-64 in American Museum Novitates 3654 on page 20, DOI: 10.1206/648.1, http://zenodo.org/record/535741
Fig. 8 in A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda)
No full textFig. 8. Transverse CT slices (59, A; 76, B) through the rostrum of Saurornithoides mongoliensis (AMNH FR 6516) showing the extensive palatal shelves of the maxilla.Published as part of Norell, Mark A., Makovicky, Peter J., Bever, Gabe S., Balanoff, Amy M., Clark, James M., Barsbold, Rinchen & Rowe, Timothy, 2009, A Review of the Mongolian Cretaceous Dinosaur Saurornithoides (Troodontidae: Theropoda), pp. 1-64 in American Museum Novitates 3654 on page 13, DOI: 10.1206/648.1, http://zenodo.org/record/535741
Fig. 12 in Cranial Anatomy of Citipati osmolskae (Theropoda, Oviraptorosauria), and a Reinterpretation of the Holotype of Oviraptor philoceratops
No full textFig. 12. Rostral regions (not to scale) of (A) the holotype of Citipati osmolskae IGM 100/978, (B) the holotype of ''Oviraptor'' mongoliensis (IGM 100/32) (reversed), (C) the holotype of Oviraptor philoceratops AMNH 6517, and (D) a referred specimen of the caenagnathid Chirostenotes pergracilis (ROM 43250) (from Sues, 1997). The maxilla of O. philoceratops is relatively longer than in the oviraptorids (B and C) but shorter than in the caenagnathid (D), which represents the plesiomorphic condition for oviraptorosaurians. Arrows indicate premaxillamaxilla contact anteriorly and palatinemaxilla contact posteriorly. Abbreviations in appendix 1.Published as part of CLARK, JAMES M., NORELL, MARK A. & ROWE, TIMOTHY, 2002, Cranial Anatomy of Citipati osmolskae (Theropoda, Oviraptorosauria), and a Reinterpretation of the Holotype of Oviraptor philoceratops, pp. 1-24 in American Museum Novitates 3364 on page 19, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2002)3642.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/473483
Fig. 3 in A New Dromaeosaurid Theropod from Ukhaa Tolgod (Ömnögov, Mongolia)
No full textFig. 3. (Continued). E, holotype of Tsaagan mangas (IGM 100/1015) in left anterior view. F, holotype of Tsaagan mangas (IGM 100/1015) in posterior view. Abbreviations are in appendix 1.Published as part of Norell, Mark A., Clark, James M., Turner, Alan H., Makovicky, Peter J., Barsbold, Rinchen & Rowe, Timothy, 2006, A New Dromaeosaurid Theropod from Ukhaa Tolgod (Ömnögov, Mongolia), pp. 1-51 in American Museum Novitates 3545 (1) on page 6, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3545[1:ANDTFU]2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/538607
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
