1,721,171 research outputs found
Biomimicking Extracellular Vesicles with Fully Artificial Ones: A Rational Design of EV-BIOMIMETICS toward Effective Theranostic Tools in Nanomedicine
Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) are the protagonists in cell communication and membrane trafficking, being responsible for the delivery of innumerable biomolecules and signaling moieties. At the moment, they are of paramount interest to researchers, as they naturally show incredibly high efficiency and specificity in delivering their cargo. For these reasons, EVs are employed or inspire the development of nanosized therapeutic delivery systems. In this Perspective, we propose an innovative strategy for the rational design of EV-mimicking vesicles (EV-biomimetics) for theranostic scopes. We first report on the current state-of-the-art use of EVs and their byproducts, such as surface-engineered EVs and EV-hybrids, having an artificial cargo (drug molecule, genetic content, nanoparticles, or dye incorporated in their lumen). Thereafter, we report on the new emerging field of EV-mimicking vesicles for theranostic scopes. We introduce an approach to prepare new, fully artificial EV-biomimetics, with particular attention to maintaining the natural reference lipidic composition. We overview those studies investigating natural EV membranes and the possible strategies to identify key proteins involved in site-selective natural homing, typical of EVs, and their cargo transfer to recipient cells. We propose the use also of molecular simulations, in particular of machine learning models, to approach the problem of lipid organization and self-assembly in natural EVs. We also discuss the beneficial feedback that could emerge combining the experimental tests with atomistic and molecular simulations when designing an EV-biomimetics lipid bilayer. The expectations from both research and industrial fields on fully artificial EV-biomimetics, having the same key functions of natural ones plus new diagnostic or therapeutic functions, could be enormous, as they can greatly expand the nanomedicine applications and guarantee on-demand and scalable production, off-the-shelf storage, high reproducibility of morphological and functional properties, and compliance with regulatory standards
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Axis II comorbidity in euthymic bipolar disorder patients: no differences between bipolar I and II subtypes
Bipolar disorder type II (BDII) has been considered since its
distinction from bipolar disorder type I (BDI) as a milder form, on the basis of cross-sectional symptoms intensity. Longitudinal data, on the contrary, do suggest that it is at least as severe as BDI, if not even more chronic and impairing. Few studies investigated differences in Axis II comorbidity in bipolar disorder patients according to bipolar subtypes, and none examined patients
during prolonged euthymia. The aim of the study was to determine comorbidity rates for personality disorders in euthymic bipolar subjects, comparing bipolar type I and II disorders (BDI and BDII). METHODS: 186 DSM-IV (SCID-I) bipolar disorder subjects were enrolled; all patients were euthymic for at least two
months, as confirmed by a HAM-D<8 and a YMRS<6. Axis II comorbidity was evaluated through SCID-II. Differences in Axis II comorbidity rates were examined with the Pearson's Chi-square test. RESULTS: Of the subjects included, 71 had BDI and 115 BDII. At least a personality disorder was present in 42.5% of all bipolars, 43.7% of BDI and 41.7% of BDII. No differences were detected between the two subgroups for any single personality disorder. LIMITATIONS: We relied only on the patients'
reports in assessing personality disorders; the sample was made of subjects referred to a tertiary centre who were able to maintain euthymia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the high comorbidity rates for personality disorders in
bipolar subjects and provides evidence that BDII, with regard to Axis II comorbidity, is as severe as BDI
Impact of anxiety disorder comorbidity on quality of life in euthymic bipolar disorder patients: differences between bipolar I and II subtypes
BACKGROUND: Few studies investigated the impact of anxiety disorder comorbidity on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of bipolar patients and none examined bipolar subtypes differences. The aim of the study was 1) to determine comorbidity rates for anxiety disorders in euthymic bipolar subjects, comparing bipolar type I and II disorders (BDI and BDII), and 2) to compare within each group HRQoL measures in subjects with and without anxiety comorbidity. METHODS: Comorbidity was evaluated through the SCID-I; HRQoL was assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). All subjects were euthymic since at least 2 months, as confirmed by a HAM-D <8 and a YMRS <6. A comparison was made for SF-36 scores between subjects (all bipolars, BDI and BDII) with and without anxiety disorders. RESULTS: 105 patients were enrolled: 44 with BDI and 61 with BDII. Current and lifetime anxiety disorders comorbidities were 32.4% and 41.0% for all bipolars, 31.8% and 40.9% for BDI and 32.8% and 41.0% for BDII. BDI patients differed in several SF-36 domains from BDII subjects, which reported a poorer HRQoL. A current and lifetime comorbid anxiety disorder was associated with a poorer HRQoL considering all bipolars; when examining separately BDI and II subjects, however, the deleterious effect was restricted to BDI patients. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional assessment of HRQoL, the generic instrument used (SF-36) and the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the high comorbidity rates for anxiety disorders in bipolar subjects and provides evidence that anxiety comorbidity impacts HRQoL in subjects with BDI and not BDII.
PMID: 17617468 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
- …
