1,720,976 research outputs found
Radiation-associated angiosarcoma - Diagnostic and therapeutic implications - Two case reports and a review of the literature
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Immunohistochemical evaluation of multiple biological markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
No full textIn order to obtain prognostic clinicopathological information, 49 cases of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS), were evaluated for the immunohistochemical expression of potential predictor markers including c-erbB-2 oncogene product, p53 protein, oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, oestrogen-regulated proteins pS2 and cathepsin-D (cath-D), CD44 protein and 67-kDa laminin receptor (MLuC5). Immunohistochemical findings were compared with conventional pathological parameters, clinical findings, and the clinical outcome of the patients. When markers were matched to each other, statistical analyses provided a significant positive correlation between c-erbB-2 overexpression and p53 positivity (P < 0.01) and between ER and PR (P < 0.01), ER, PR and pS2 (P < 0.01), pS2 and MLuC5 (P < 0.05). Significant negative correlations between c-erbB-2 overexpression and ER (P < 0.05), PR (P < 0.01) and pS2 (P < 0.01) positivity was also observed. Data on the relationship between marker status and pathological findings revealed a significant positive trend between c-erbB-2, p53, and increased grade values (P < 0.05) and opposite results with SR receptor expression (P < 0.01). c-erbB-2 overexpression was further significantly associated with comedotype carcinoma (P < 0.05) and distribution of disease in confluent neoplastic ducts (P < 0.01). Although no statistically significant correlation among biological markers expression, clinical findings and outcome was demonstrated, overall this study indicates that tumour cells from a subset of DCIS, which includes comedotype carcinoma, express significantly unfavourable prognostic factors. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Lt
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Hypofractionation of partial breast irradiation using radiobiological models
No full textPurpose: To reduce the fraction number in Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) with initial prescription of 40 Gy in 10 fractions using radiobiological models with specific focus on risk of moderate/severe radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) and report clinical results. Methods and materials: 68 patients (patient group A) were treated with 40 Gy in 10 fractions delivered by field-in-field, forward-planned IMRT. Isotoxic regimens with decreasing number of fractions were calculated using Biological Effective Dose (BED) to the breast. Risk for RIF in hypofractionated treatment was predicted by calculating NTCP from DVHs of group A rescaled to fractions and dose of novel regimens. Moderate/severe RIF was prospectively scored during follow-up. Various NTCP models, with and without incomplete repair correction, were assessed from difference to observed incidence of RIF. In order to verify the value for α/β of 3 Gy assumed for breast, we fitted α/β to observed incidences of moderate/severe RIF. Results: Treatments with 35 Gy/7f and 28 Gy/4f were selected for the fraction reduction protocol. 75 patients (group B) were treated in 35 Gy/7f. Incidence of moderate/severe RIF was 5.9% in group A, 5.3% in group B. The NTCP model with correction for incomplete repair had lowest difference from observed RIF. The α/β obtained from fitting was 2.8 (95%CIs 1.1-10.7) Gy. Conclusions: The hypofractionated regimen was well tolerated. The model for NTCP corrected for incomplete repair was the most accurate and an assumed α/β value of 3 Gy is consistent with our patient data. The hypofractionation protocol is continuing with patients treated with 28 Gy/4f. © 2015 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
