1,721,094 research outputs found
Palmitoylethanolamide relaxes the bovine ophthalmic artery through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARS) in endothelium-indipendent manner
No full textResponse to "Comment on "Safety of silicone oils as intraocular medical device: An in vitro cytotoxicity study" by M. R. Romano et al. (Exp. Eye Res. Vol 194, May 2020, 108018)"
No full textCorrigendum - Intraocular pressure changes following the use of silicone oil or Densiron 68 as endotamponade in pars plana vitrectomy
No full textRomano MR, Angi M, Romano V, et alA word was omitted from the conclusion of the Abstract. The correct version is as follows:Conclusion: Overall, the use of Densiron 68 was not associated with significantly higher IOP values as compared with SSO
Fluidics of Single and Double Blade Guillotine Vitrectomy Probes in Balanced Salt Solution and Artificial Vitreous
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
A randomised controlled trial of ranibizumab with and without ketorolac eyedrops for exudative age-related macular degeneration
No full textAIMS:
To evaluate whether ketorolac eyedrops and ranibizumab intravitreal injections would provide additional benefit over ranibizumab alone in the treatment of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV).
METHODS:
This was a pilot study of eyes with new-onset CNV. A total of 56 patients were enrolled consecutively and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive combination treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab and topical ketorolac (group 1) or ranibizumab alone (group 2). All patients received monthly 0.5-mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections for 3 months, after which monthly injections were administered in accordance with the standard of care. Group 1 patients also self-administered one drop of ketorolac three times a day for 6 months. All patients were followed up for 6 months.
RESULTS:
At 6 months, both groups showed a significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (both, p<0.001). The two treatments did not show significant differences in terms of the number of ranibizumab injections required. However, the mean 6-month change in central macular thickness (CMT) in the combination group was -124 μm (-29.7%; p<0.001), while in the ranibizumab-only group, the change was -86.9 μm (-19.5%; p=0.001); thus, the combination treatment resulted in a greater reduction (p=0.003). The combination treatment had no adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS:
This pilot study is the first to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination of 0.45% ketorolac eyedrops three times a day and intravitreal ranibizumab injections in patients with CNV, and suggests that topical ketorolac supplements the activity of intravitreal ranibizumab in reducing CMT in CNV
- …
