1,720,956 research outputs found
Obstraction.
No full textSolo exhibition consisted of twelve new pieces: four mixed media on Twinwall and eight oil and acrylic on canvas. Accompanied by a four page leaflet [Italian and English text]
Singularity.
No full textExhibition consisted of eleven pieces: seven mixed media on Twinwall, two mixed media on paper [framed], one small oil and acrylic on canvas and one large site specific wall collage measuring 15 x 22 ft
"Paperview" An Exhibition curated by Danny Rolph
No full textPAPERVIEWPress Preview May 28th 6pm Private View May 28th 7-9pm Exhibition May 29th – July 3rd Panel Discussion June 17thJohn Jones are delighted to announce the next exhibition in the John Jones Project Space.PAPERVIEW brings together works on paper from three renowned London based art collections, alongside a selection of emerging and established London based artists.The featured pieces reflect curator Danny Rolph's ongoing fascination with work created on paper. His selection offers us a multitude of visual and conceptual qualities that explore our relationship with the material, paralleling Rolph’s own studio practice, where opposing ideas and sensations occupy the same space simultaneously, looking for questions through instinctive and subjective arrangements.At a time when many galleries are reducing their exhibition programmes, PAPERVIEW celebrates the humble medium of paper by bringing together works by 75 artists from around the world.The exhibition has been supported by John Jones to create an open discourse on both the passion and practicalities of collecting. In the current economic climate John Jones hopes to help galvanise the art market and inspire new collectors.In recent years the market has been driven by a thirst for profit through investment. These three collections bring the focus back to the art and the curator’s obsession with paper in a perfect way to explore the collections and bring together an exhibition that highlights the importance of collecting.A panel discussion on June 17th led by writer and critic Martin Holman will invite a panel of guests to share their experiences of developing a contemporary collection, whilst discussing ideas that link and differentiate their collecting practice.The panel will include Danny Rolph, Elizabeth Neilson (Curator and Head of the Zabludowicz Collection), John Evans (Cofounder of the Lodeveans Collection) and Kate Jones (John Jones Art Collection).A selection of works from the Whitechapel Gallery Limited Editions will accompany PAPERVIEW, bringing together an extensive range of artists working on different media and offering an excellent and affordable way to start a collection. Artist editions include Alex Katz, Paul McCarthy, Paul Noble and Albert Oehlen.PRESS RELEASEPAPERVIEW Artists:Eri Itoi, Raqib Shaw, David Hockney, Richard Hamilton, Justin Hibbs, Danica Phelps, Felipe Jesus Consalvos, Franz Ackerman, Herman Bas, Delia Brown, Oliver Clegg, Barnaby Furnas, Wade Guyton, Christian Holstad, Anya Kielar, Kris Martin, Martin Kippenberger, Aleksandra Mir, Ian Monroe, Peggy Preheim, David Thorpe, Terry Winters, Kenji Yanobe, Lisa Yuskavage, Boakye-Yiadom, Olly Fathers,Leigh Clarke, Dale Adcock, Elad Lassry, Maya Hewitt, David Huffman, Peter Lamb, Piers Secunda, Georgie Hopton, Francis Upritchard, Simon Bill, Michael Stubbs, Stephen Cooper, Paul Housley, Flo Pullin, Chris Daniel, Joep Overtoom, Alex Veness, Vanessa Jackson, Sacha Craddock, Dan Coombs, Chantal Joffe, Jen Weikuo, Appau Junior, Sarah Douglas, Daniel Pasteiner, Perry Roberts, Hurvin Andersen, Anna Barribal, Heiko Blankenstein, Joshua Cardoso, Fernanda Chieco, Jose Damasceno, Alan Davie, Nogah Engler, Roland Flexner, Richard Forster, David Huffman, Pauline Kraneis, Michael Landy, Julie Mehretu, Bruno Pacheco, PjotaJorge Queiroz, James Aldridge, Luiz Sacilotto, Sarah Strang, James Aldridge Marepe<br/
Tipping Point
No full textHow is an image, an idea or a material reigned-in and controlled? At what point is that control relinquished and abandoned? And what formal and conceptual residues does this internal challenge leave in the work?This show questions how different artists tackle these opposing aspects and tensions within their work, continually shifting their point of balance and reference.Describing both the stage in an epidemic when a virus reaches critical mass and the toppling effect of weight added to a balanced object, the term ‘tipping point’ embodies a sense of impending change, signalling thearrival of a shift or juncture in the fine balance between harmony and disorder, control and chaos. It describes the very moment when a threshold is reached where the existing equilibrium threatens to spiral out of control.It is where work exists with respect to this threshold and how its boundaries are negotiated, circumvented or challenged head-on that forms the central concern of this show. Lying along a spectrum of experience, Tipping Point looks at the tensions inherent in these varying states of balance and seeks to explore the slippages that occur between them.<br/
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
