1,720,976 research outputs found

    A new approach to spatial entropy measures

    Full text link
    Entropy is widely employed in many applied sciences to measure the heterogeneity of observations. Recently, many attempts have been made to build entropy measures for spatial data, in order to capture the influence of space over the variable outcomes. The main limit of these developments is that all indices are computed conditional on a single distance and do not cover the whole spatial configuration of the phenomenon under study. Moreover, most of them do not satisfy the desirable additivity property between local and global spatial measures. This work reviews some recent developments, based on univariate distributions, and compares them to a new approach which considers the properties of entropy measures linked to bivariate distributions. This perspective introduces substantial innovations. Firstly, Shannon’s entropy may be decomposed into two terms: spatial mutual information, accounting for the role of space in determining the variable outcome, and spatial global residual entropy, summarizing the remaining heterogeneity carried by the variable itself. Secondly, these terms both satisfy the additivity property, being sums of partial entropies measuring what happens at different distance classes. The proposed indices are used for measuring the spatial entropy of a marked point pattern on rainforest tree species. The new entropy measures are shown to be more informative and to answer a wider set of questions than the current proposals of the literature

    Advances in spatial entropy measures

    Full text link
    A very recent proposal of a set of entropy measures for spatial data, based on building pairs of realizations, allows to split the data heterogeneity that is usually assessed via Shannon's entropy into two components: spatial mutual information, identifying the role of space, and spatial residual entropy, measuring heterogeneity due to other sources. A further decomposition into partial terms deeply investigates the role of space at specific distance ranges. The present work proposes improvements to the method and adds relevant results proving that the new set of spatial entropies satisfies a list of desirable properties. We extend the methodology to sets of realizations greater than pairs. We also show that the approach is more general, better performing and more interpretable than the most popular proposals in the literature, thanks to the property of additivity and a new way of computing entropy that explicitly discards the order within sets. A novel procedure for building the necessary quantities for computations is also provided. A comparative study illustrates the superior performance of the new set of measures over representative spatial configurations. Practical questions are answered by means of a case study on land use data

    Estimation of causal effects in latent strata with an encouragement for response

    No full text
    We consider a new approach to deal with non ignorable non response on an outcome variable, in a causal inference framework. Assuming that a binary instrumental variable for non response is available, we provide a likelihoodbased approach to identify and estimate heterogeneous causal effects of a binary treatment on specific latent subgroups of units, named principal strata, defined by the non response behavior under each level of the treatment and of the instrument. We show that, within each stratum, non response is ignorable and respondents can be properly compared by treatment status. In order to assess our method and its robustness when the usually invoked assumptions are relaxed or misspecified, we simulate data to resemble a real experiment conducted on a panel survey which compares different methods of reducing panel attrition

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore