1,720,966 research outputs found
On the Methodologies to Compute Minimum Jerk Trajectories and Their Application in Collaborative Robotics
A Variational Approach to Minimum-Jerk Trajectories for Psychological Safety in Collaborative Assembly Stations
Collaborative robotics is one of the main drivers of
the fourth industrial revolution, where robots and humans cooperate
in a shared workspace. Such robots are distinguished from the
traditional robots by several features that, if tuned correctly, ensure
safe physical interaction.However, interactionwith robots also
represents a potential source of psychological stress. Indeed, it has
been proven that working and sharing the workspace with robots
can psychologically stress the operator. This drawback—in addition
to the reduced speed operation imposed by safety standards—
represents a constraint difficult to bear for small and medium-sized
enterprises. In this letter, we propose a novel trajectory-planning
methodology for collaborative robots able to ensure both psychological
and physical safety. We rely on the available literature and
the calculus of variations to identify a family of psychologically acceptableminimum-
jerk trajectories. From the identified family,we
compute the fastest trajectory that limits the physical danger represented
by the robot. A numerical implementation of the method
is discussed, and experimental results prove the effectiveness of the
idea
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Correction: Phenotypic continuum between Waardenburg syndrome and idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in humans with <em>SOX10</em> variants
\ua9 2023Correction to: Genetics in Medicine 2021; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01051-3, published online 13 January 2021. In the article “Phenotypic continuum between Waardenburg syndrome and idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in humans with SOX10 variants” by Rojas RA et al (Genet Med 2021;23:629-636), the author Kathryn B. Salnikov\u27s name was incorrectly listed as “Kathyrn B. Salnikov” in the author listing. The article has been corrected online and can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01051-3. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
