1,720,996 research outputs found
Impact of Circulating and Tissue Biomarkers in Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Melanoma: Ready for Prime Time?
No full textThe prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma has substantially improved over the last years with the advent of novel treatment strategies, mainly immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Given the survival benefit provided in the metastatic setting and the evidence from prospective clinical trials in the early stages, these drugs have been introduced as adjuvant therapies for high-risk resected stage III disease. Several studies have also investigated immune checkpoint inhibitors, as well as BRAF and MEK inhibitors, for neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk stage III melanoma, with preliminary evidence suggesting this could be a very promising approach in this setting. However, even with new strategies, the risk of disease recurrence varies widely among stage III patients, and no available biomarkers for predicting disease recurrence have been established to date. Improved risk stratification is particularly relevant in this setting to avoid unnecessary treatment for patients who have minimum risk of disease recurrence and to reduce toxicities and costs. Research for predictive and prognostic biomarkers in this setting is ongoing to potentially shed light on the complex interplay between the tumor and the host immune system, and to further personalize treatment. This review provides an insight into available data on circulating and tissue biomarkers, including the tumor microenvironment and associated gene signatures, and their predictive and prognostic role during neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for cutaneous high-risk melanoma patients
Prevention and treatment of pandemic influenza in cancer patients
No full textEvery year influenza A epidemics cause numerous deaths and
millions of hospitalizations, but the most important effects are
generally seen when new viral strains emerge from different
species.
In April 2009, for the first time in 41 years, a novel type of
influenza A virus acquired the capacity for human-to-human
transmission and caused a pandemic. This virus, ‘pandemic
2009 influenza A (H1N1)virus’, was derived from swine A
(H1N1), which was a recombination of avian, human, and
several swine influenza viruses [1].
Overall, the 2009 pandemic flu has been considered mild. In
fact, most cases caused by the 2009 H1N1 virus were acute and
self-limited, with the highest attack rates reported, as expected,
among children and young adults. The relative sparing of adults
is presumably due to the exposure of aged persons to
antigenetically related influenza viruses earlier in life, resulting
in the development of cross-protective antibodies [2]. The
Center for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that about
59 million people were infected from April 2009 to mid-
February 2010 in the United States; of these, about 265 000
were hospitalized and 12 000 died with an overall case fatality
rate of 0.0203% [3]
Proton Pump Inhibitors in cancer patients: How useful they are? A review of the most common indications for their use
No full textProton-Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed in the general population and in cancer patients. A supposed role in the prevention of gastric mucosal damage apparently justify their use in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy, steroids and radiotherapy on the gastro-duodenal region. They are frequently given also to patients admitted to Intensive Care Units, for the prevention of stress-related gastric ulcers. The evidence about these use of gastroprotection is reviewed. In the majority of the cases the prescription of PPIs is not justified. In two circumstances (chemotherapy and stress-related gastric disease) randomized studies have shown a protective action of PPIs although this effect did not translate into the reduction of serious clinical consequences. PPIs are not free of toxic effects that are acknowledged by an expanding literature. Also the interaction with anticancer drugs is a potential source of unwanted consequences
Targeting inflamed and non-inflamed melanomas: biological background and clinical challenges
No full textImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated impressive antitumor activity in patients with advanced and early stage melanoma, thus improving long-term survival outcomes. However, most patients derive limited benefit from immunotherapy, due to the development of primary, adaptive, or acquired resistance mechanisms. Immunotherapy resistance is a complex phenomenon that depends on genetic and epigenetic mechanisms which, in turn, drive the interplay between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME). Immunologically "cold" (i.e. non-inflamed) tumors lack or have few tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a result of low tumor mutational burden (TMB), defective antigen presentation, or physical barriers to lymphocyte migration, resulting in a minimal benefit from immunotherapy. In contrast, in most cases immunologically "hot" (i.e. inflamed) tumors display high TMB, implying a higher load of neoantigens and increased programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, with a consequently higher rate of TILs. However, the presence of TILs does not necessarily denote the tumor as immunologically "hot", since the presence of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells persistently exposed to antigenic stimulation induces a dysfunctional state called "exhaustion", which leads to a reduced response to immunotherapy. In recent years, efforts have been made to characterize mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy, and to investigate strategies to overcome treatment resistance. Indeed, predictors of response and toxicity to immunotherapy are still lacking and, to date, there are no reliable predictive biomarkers to select patients according to baseline clinical, histological, or genomic characteristics. In this review, we will focus on the morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of the TME, and on the molecular determinants of resistance to immunotherapy, differentiating between inflamed and non-inflamed melanomas. Then, we will provide a thorough overview of preclinical data on genetic and epigenetic mechanisms with a potential impact on the immune response and patient outcome. Finally, we will focus our attention on the role of potential biomarkers in determining disease response to immunotherapy, in the adjuvant and metastatic setting, providing an insight into current and future research in this field
Is There a Role for Multiple Lines of Anti-HER2 Therapies Administered Beyond Progression in HER2-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Case Report and Literature Review
No full textAbstract Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a number of distinct disease subtypes, each of which is characterised by druggable genetic alterations. Among them, the receptor tyrosine kinase protein human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2) is occasionally found deregulated via gene mutation and/or amplification and/or protein overexpression. HER2 mutation, in particular, is a relatively rare condition which occurs in 1–4% of NSCLC patients, especially in those with adenocarcinoma histology and a never/light smoking history. However, the clinical relevance of a HER2 mutation in NSCLC relies on the fact that this genetic alteration has been associated with sensitivity to anti-HER2 therapies such as the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab or the pan-HER-tyrosine kinase inhibitor poziotinib. Here we describe the case of a NSCLC patient with an activating exon 20 G776VinsC mutation in the HER2 gene who responded well to multiple lines of trastuzumab-based therapies administered beyond progression and poziotinib given sequentially. In this specific case, the discovery of a druggable genetic alteration such as a mutation in the HER2 gene allowed for long-term control of the disease through the use of highly effective anti-HER2 therapies
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
