1,720,969 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Experiences in the management of brainstem hematomas
The purpose of this study was to present our experience in the management of spontaneous brainstem hematomas (BSH). Records of 58 consecutive patients were reviewed, including demographic data, symptoms, Glasgow Coma Scale, treatment, intraoperative findings (in surgical cases), and outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Fifteen patients were comatose (GCS 4 or less): 11/15 patients were treated conservatively. Four patients with accompanying acute occlusive hydrocephalus were treated by placement of an external ventricular drainage. None survived. In nine patients (60%), arteriosclerosis and/or long-standing arterial hypertension were known and arteriopathic BSH was suspected. Forty-three patients were not comatose: 37 patients showed no impairment of consciousness (GCS 15), 6 patients presented with mild disturbance of conscious state (GCS 13), progressing to coma (GCS 8) in 1. In the majority (36/43) of the non-comatose patients (83.7%) cavernoma could be revealed and removed surgically. In six patients (14%), an atypically located arteriopathic BSH was assumed and treated medically. One patient had an underlying brainstem arteriovenous malformation and was treated radiosurgically. Many arteriopathic BSH cause immediate coma indicating direct and irreversible damage of midpontine structures. Thus, we suggest not to proceed to surgery, even if the bleeding is accompanied by acute hydrocephalus. The majority of BSH not resulting in immediate coma are caused by underlying cavernomas. In these cases surgery should be considered
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Fibrinolytic therapy versus craniotomy for anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage
Object: Anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhages (AAICH) have a high morbidity and mortality, necessitating urgent treatment. We examined outcomes after conventional craniotomy and stereotactic fibrinolytic therapy in a series of patients with anticoagulant-associated hemorrhages. Methods: Among 129 consecutive surgically treated patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage, 27 patients with AAICH were identified (mean age 62; range 36-79). Thirteen patients underwent craniotomy for surgical hematoma evacuation, and 14 patients hematoma puncture and catheter placement for clot: lysis. The groups had comparable major prognostic factors such as hematoma volume, age, and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score at admission. Results: Nine patients died despite treatment (mortality=33%). Mortality in the craniotomy group was comparable to that of the lysis group (46% versus 21 %; p = 0.13). Good outcomes (Glasgow outcome score of 4 or 5) were seen in 3 craniotomy patients (23%) and 2 fibrinolysis patients (14%). Half the patients survived with major neurological deficits (GOS 2 or 3) (n = 13; 48%). One rebleed was observed two days after uneventful craniotomy and hematoma removal, while no patient who underwent fibrinolysis had rebleeding. Conclusions: Approximately one-fifth of patients with AAICH managed surgically may have good outcomes. Mortality and favourable outcome rates are comparable between craniotomy and fibrinolytic therapy. Fibrinolytic therapy appears to be a reasonable less invasive alternative treatment modality for intracerebral hemorrhage in the anticoagulated patient. Published by Elsevier B.V.William R Van Wagenen Fellowshi
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
