125,196 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Sears, Roebuck & Co. interior, Seattle, March 17, 1943

    No full text
    Handwritten on sleeve: Sears Roebuck, 65th & Roosevelt Way 3-17-43.1 safety film negative: b&w; 8 x 10 in

    Letter from W. T. Johnson to John B. Hatfield, Manager of Sears Roebuck & Company Mail Order House, Greensboro, NC

    No full text
    Letter from W. T. Johnson to John B. Hatfield, Manager of Sears Roebuck & Company Mail Order House, Greensboro, NC, requesting sponsorship for banquet at Vocational Agriculture Teachers\u27 Conference

    Roebuck Street, Barbados, B. W. I.

    No full text
    Landscape; Sephia tone; 3 ½” x 5½ ”This image shows an aerial view of Roebuck Street in Bridgetown, Barbados. The street is very busy seen with many persons going about their business. On both sides of the street are buildings which houses three-storey stores. Utility poles are seen servicing electricity to the stores. Horse drawn carts and a motor car line both sides of the street. The buildings are of architectural interest with roofs, windows and doors. One store sign is marked “W. H. Bryan”, and the other store is marked “JOHNS”. This is a divided back postcard. Back of the Postcard PP £1

    Front Exterior of Roebuck House in Jacksonville, Alabama 1

    No full text
    The Roebuck House was located in Jacksonville, Alabama. Shown is a front exterior view of the historic home. (circa March 4, 1987)https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/lib-ac-histimg/2008/thumbnail.jp

    Letter from W. C. Greenway of Sears-Roebuck Foundation, to W. T. Johnson

    No full text
    Letter from W. C. Greenway of Sears-Roebuck Foundation, to W. T. Johnson, giving statement on S. B. Simmons for camp dedication. Statement for souvenir program

    Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology

    No full text
    To unify or not to unify applied psychology: that is the question. In this article we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question—from a comprehensive, positivist, “top-down,” deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 60s, to a postmodern no since then. A rationale and proposal for a limited, “bottom-up,” inductive yes in applied psychology is then presented, employing a case-based paradigm that integrates both positivist and postmodern themes and components. This paradigm is labeled “pragmatic psychology” and, its specific use of case studies, the “Pragmatic Case Study Method” (“PCS Method”). We call for the creation of peer-reviewed journal-databases of pragmatic case studies as a foundational source of unifying applied knowledge in our discipline. As one example, the potential of the PCS Method for unifying different angles of theoretical regard is illustrated in an area of applied psychology, psychotherapy, via the case of Mrs. B. The article then turns to the broader historical and epistemological arguments for the unifying nature of the PCS Method in both applied and basic psychology.Peer reviewe
    corecore