1,720,975 research outputs found
Angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor in symptomatic patients with Duchenne dilated cardiomyopathy: A primetime
No full textAbstract Aims Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X‐linked recessive neuromuscular disorder, characterized by significant long‐term cardiac involvement. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the main cause of death in DMD, and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and beta‐blockers (BB) are first‐line treatments in DCM. It is unknown whether angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) could provide greater benefits in this setting. Our aim is to assess whether ARNi use may prevent deterioration in ejection fraction (EF) or is associated with EF improvement compared with ACEi in DMD patients with heart failure and to report the tolerability of ARNi in this group of patients. Methods and results We followed 22 DMD patients, 6 of them with an EF 40%. The first group received ARNi on top of BB, while the control group started or continued first‐line therapy with ACEi ± BB. From December 2016 to December 2021, we recorded EF values at baseline and at follow‐up, comparing EF changes. Median follow‐up was 7 months (interquartile range 4.7–9.1). At baseline, the mean of EF (%) in the ARNi group was 31 ± 2%, while it was 59 ± 9% in the control group. At follow‐up, we recorded an EF improvement in the ARNi group (38 ± 6%, P‐value < 0.05). Among controls, EF at follow‐up was substantially unchanged from baseline. Conclusions Our data suggest that the use of ARNi in DMD patients with DCM and an EF < 40% might be associated with an EF improvement and a safe tolerability profile
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Time-to-first clinical benefit in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
No full textAppropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Intracoronary bolus of glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibitor as bridging or adjunctive strategy to oral P2Y(12) inhibitor load in the modern setting of STEMI
No full textBackground: In the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) bolus not followed by intravenous infusion is potentially advantageous given their fast onset and offset of action, but clinical evidence in a contemporary setting is limited.
Methods: We collected data from consecutive STEMI patients admitted to the cardiac catheterization laboratory of the IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation from October 2017 to September 2019.
Results: Out of 423 consecutive STEMI patients, 297 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Of them, 107/297 (36%) received an intracoronary GPI bolus-only during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) not followed by intravenous infusion and 190/297 (64%) received standard antithrombotic therapy. Of the 107 GPI-treated, 22/107 (21%) had P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment (adjunctive strategy) and 85/107 (79%) did not (bridging strategy). During hospital staying, there was no difference in the primary safety endpoint of TIMI major+minor bleeding (P=0.283), TIMI major (P=0.267) or TIMI minor (P=0.685) bleeding between groups. No stroke event occurred in the GPI group. Despite patients receiving GPI having a significantly higher intraprocedural ischemic burden, no significant differences were found in the efficacy outcomes between groups. Consistent findings were observed for patients receiving GPIs bolus before (bridging strategy) or after (adjunctive strategy) P2Y12 inhibitors, compared to those receiving standard therapy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses did not find any independent predictors significantly associated to the primary and secondary composite endpoints.
Conclusions: In a contemporary real-world population of STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, the use of intracoronary GPIs bolus-only in selected patients at high ischemic risk is safe and could represent a useful antithrombotic strategy both in those pretreated and in those naïve to P2Y12 inhibitors
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
