1,720,966 research outputs found
“Go and get it checked”: exploring the decision to attend the emergency department for low back pain
No full textPurpose and background: low back pain affects individuals and society, straining Emergency Departments (EDs) and prolonging wait times. While personal factors influence ED visits, third-party advice's role is underexplored. Limited guidance for healthcare professionals emphasises the need for effective back pain management to ease system strain and improve patient outcomes. This study examines motivations for ED visits due to low back pain. Methods and results: this research utilised secondary analysis of qualitative data from a previous multisite study, adopting a subtle realist approach. From August to December 2021, 47 patients (26 M:21 F, aged 23–79) with back pain were sampled from four English EDs (2 Northern, 2 Southern) to capture diversity in sociodemographic and LBP characteristics. Eight patients had previously visited the ED for this back pain episode. During the pandemic, semi-structured interviews were conducted online, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically. Three key themes influenced decisions to attend ED: Healthcare professionals, trusted others, and individuals. Healthcare professionals often dictated choices, making participants feel powerless. Trusted others offered varying support, acting as allies. Individuals wrestled with anxiety about pain severity and uncertainty regarding LBP. Conclusion: this study emphasises the need for healthcare professionals to offer clear guidance on when individuals and their caregivers should visit the ED for back pain. Findings show that pain-related worries significantly drive ED visits, misaligning with practice guidelines. Healthcare providers must consider these issues when creating strategies to manage low back pain patients and optimise ED resources.</p
Perceived acquisition, development and delivery of empathy in musculoskeletal physiotherapy encounters
No full textEmpathy is considered essential to creating a positive clinician-patient relationship, along with improving patient experience and adherence to treatment. It is not clear how physiotherapists acquire their empathic skills.This study explored physiotherapists’ perceptions of empathy during musculoskeletal clinical encounters. Seventeen participants attended three focus groups separated by clinical employment grade. The definition of empathy, its acquisition and impact on a clinical encounter were discussed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.Six key themes and 48 sub-themes were identified. Empathy was defined similarly in all three focus groups. There was divergence on its acquisition and the extent to which it can be taught, however participants agreed that empathy is an innate characteristic. Senior physiotherapists placed greater emphasis on the importance of empathic communication than student physiotherapists, whilst student and junior physiotherapists considered limited clinical experience to be a barrier in delivering empathic communication, anticipating this to improve over time.This study identified a mismatch between the perceived importance of empathic communication in the literature and by clinicians, compared with the time spent acquiring and developing these skills. Clinicians need to place a greater emphasis on enhancing their empathic communication skills throughout their career to help create a positive patient experience and enhance clinician-patient relationships
Interruption and rapport disruption: measuring the prevalence and nature of verbal interruptions during back pain consultations
No full textBackground: evaluating the impact of communication during clinical encounters is complex. One behaviour, largely ignored in clinical practice and training, is interruptions in verbal communication. Two types exist: an ‘overlap’ (an error projecting when a turn ends); and an ‘interruption’ (when an individual starts talking before the speaker's turn is complete). This paper reports the prevalence of these behaviours during initial consultations involving physiotherapists and patients with back pain.Methods: 25 initial back pain consultations were observed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, analysed thematically and managed using a Framework approach.Results: the data set comprised 15,489 turns: 7659 by patients; 7647 by clinicians; and 183 by others (patients’ spouse or clinical colleagues). Clinicians were 7 times more likely to interrupt than patients (284 and 39 respectively), however overlaps were 1.5 times more prevalent among patients (n = 582) compared to clinicians (n = 385). The main functions for interruptions by clinicians and patients were to ‘seek’ or ‘give’ additional information respectively. A trend was noted that female physiotherapists were 3 times more likely to interrupt than male clinicians and overall, the prevalence of interruptions in same-sex consultations was twice as likely as in mixed-sex encounters, however the small sample size precluded secondary analyses.Conclusion: alongside measuring the prevalence of interruptions in back pain consultations, this study identified differences in the nature of interruptions made by physiotherapists and patients. It highlights the complexity of clinical encounters and being aware of interruptions is important to optimize rapport and clinician-patient relationships
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
