1,721,924 research outputs found

    Robert Pierpoint: A life at CBS News.

    No full text
    This is the first biography of journalist Robert Pierpoint, a contemporary of Edward R. Murrow, hired by him to cover the Korean War for CBS. He went on to cover the White House, through six presidents. In more than 40 years with the network, he covered the Kennedy assassination, Watergate, Nixon\u27s resignation, and the State Department, culminating in memorable reporting for CBS Sunday Morning. He was the winner of two Emmy Awards for investigative reporting and helped shape the careers of many of today\u27s journalists, including Bob Schieffer, Dan Rather, Lesley Stahl, and Diane Sawyer.https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/books/1147/thumbnail.jp

    Flier, Robert Pierpoint: A Life At CBS News, September 17, 2014

    No full text
    A flier for a talk by Tony Silvia about his book Robert Pierpoint: A Life at CBS News, held at the University of South Florida St. Petersburg\u27s Nelson Poynter Memorial Library

    Author wanted

    No full text

    Robert Pierpoint

    No full text

    Author of quotations wanted

    No full text

    Author of poem wanted

    No full text

    Author Wanted: "Linger Not Long."

    No full text

    Charles Pigott, author of 'The Jockey club'

    No full text

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore