1,721,017 research outputs found
Terrorism and the postcolonial ‘state’
The danger inherent in the normative definition (of terrorism) is that it verges on the polemical. If ‘terrorist’ is what one calls one’s opponent (regardless of whether or not one’s friend is a freedom fighter), then the word is more of an epithet or a debating stratagem than a label that enables all who read it, whatever their ideological affiliation, to know what terrorism is and what it is not. © 2018 selection and editorial matter, Olivia U. Rutazibwa and Robbie Shilliam; individual chapters, the contributors
Hubungan internasional dan pemikiran non-barat : imperilaisme, kolonialisme, dan investigasi modernitas global/ Edit.: Robbie Shilliam
xvii, 507 hal.; 23 c
Hubungan internasional dan pemikiran non-barat : imperilaisme, kolonialisme, dan investigasi modernitas global/ Edit.: Robbie Shilliam
xvii, 507 hal.; 23 cm
Decolonising the Grounds of Ethical Inquiry: A Dialogue between Kant, Foucault and Glissant
In this article I seek to decolonise the grounding of dialogue within the Europe-modern condition. I do so by working through two authors who are indispensable to the current canon of IR theory, Immanuel Kant and Michel Foucault, and one author who is largely missing from the canon, Édouard Glissant, the Martiniquean poet and literary critique. With regards to Kant and Foucault, I show how within both there exists at the same time a strong endorsement of the policing of ethical inquiry on the grounds of the European-modern and a weaker resistance to it. With regards to Glissant, I focus on his set of essays entitled Caribbean Discourse to show how he strongly endorses a relational pluralising of the grounds of ethical inquiry while at the same time retaining a weaker accommodation to the European-modern. In the course of these discussions I present each author’s assessment of an adequate ethical faculty in the form of a figure: in Kant, the enlightened philosopher; in Foucault, the creative work of art; and in Glissant, the maroon. In the final section I rehearse a dialogue amongst the three figures that opens up the grounds of ethical inquiry to decolonising impulses. </jats:p
18. Race in world politics
This chapter examines the ways in which race can been understood as a fundamental ordering principle of world politics. It explores how the histories of European imperialism and colonialism are crucial for understanding the global impact of race, and whether contemporary world politics is less racist than it was in the past. It also considers the relationship between race, biology, and culture. The chapter concludes by discussing the historical processes that gave rise to race, some key debates around the conceptualization of race, and how race continues to order world politics. Two case studies are presented: the first is about the Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League (UNIA-ACL) and the second is about caste and Dalits in India. There is also an Opposing Opinions box that asks whether racism emerged as a consequence of the slave trade.</p
- …
