1,721,120 research outputs found
Effect of protracted High-dose L-Asparaginase given as a second exsposure in a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster-based treatment: results of the randomized 9102 Intermediate-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic eukaemia study-A report from the AIEOP
PURPOSE: To assess in a randomized study the therapeutic effect of the addition of high-dose L-asparaginase (HD ASP) in the context of a Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM)-based chemotherapy regimen for intermediate risk (IR) childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1991 to April 1995, a total of 705 patients, with 59% of the cohort of patients fewer than 15 years old, with newly diagnosed non-B ALL, enrolled onto the Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP) ALL-91 study, were assigned to the IR group. Patients in remission at the beginning of the reinduction phase were randomized either to the standard treatment (SD ASP arm) or the experimental treatment (HD ASP arm; weekly intramuscular administration of HD ASP 25,000 IU/m(2) repeated for a total of 20 weeks). Most of the patients (90%) were treated with Erwinia chrysanthemi L-asparaginase product.
RESULTS: Among the 610 patients randomized to the SD ASP arm (n = 322) or to the HD ASP arm (n = 288), relapse occurred at a median time of 24 months after randomization in 76 (24%) and in 64 children (22%), respectively. Most of the relapses occurred in the marrow (100 isolated, 21 combined). There was no significant difference between the disease-free survival in the two treatment arms (P =.64), with estimated values at 7 years from randomization of 72.4% (SE 3.1) v 75.7% (SE 2.6) in the SD ASP and HD ASP arms, respectively.
CONCLUSION: No advantage was observed for IR ALL children treated with BFM-based intensive chemotherapy who received protracted E chrysanthemi HD ASP during reinduction and the early continuation phase
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type II and lethal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: Case description and review of the literature
Indicazioni all'uso e profilo di tossicità della doxorubicina liposomiale non pegilata ( MYOCET) in ematologia ed oncologia peditrica
- …
