1,720,954 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Three Papers on Pregnancy and Motherhood
This dissertation explores metaphysical and ethical dimensions of pregnancy and motherhood. Chapter 1 concerns the metaphysics of pregnancy. I defend the containment view—the position that a fetus (1) is merely contained by its mother and (2) is an organism during pregnancy. I argue against the parthood view, which states that a fetus is a maternal part. I bring the personal identity literature—particularly animalism—to bear on the metaphysics of pregnancy literature. I deploy thought experiments modeled on classic remnant, fission, and transplant cases to demonstrate that the parthood view is incompatible with standard accounts of human organism persistence. By contrast, the containment view yields the right verdicts. Chapter 2 asks: What is wrong with violence? I explore an under-recognized aspect of violence: its moral significance for parents. For many parents, raising children is part of what gives meaning, structure, and shape to their lives and senses of self—it is a reproductive project. I offer an account of projects which explains their role in our moral lives, and I argue that we have an obligation not to undermine the projects of others without good reasons. Violence harms children and thereby undermines the reproductive projects which they are central to. Thus, violence fails our obligation to parents and is a pro tanto wrong in part for this reason. This is particularly salient to mothers who perform most reproductive work. Chapter 3 asks: Is it morally praiseworthy to carry out a pregnancy, rather than terminate? I argue yes. Pregnant women undertake significant costs for the benefit of their children and are thus prima facie praiseworthy. I hypothesize that this is under-recognized in part because of the dominance of maximalist liberal and conservative positions within the abortion debate. For reasons of political expediency, conservatives portray carrying 2 out a pregnancy as minimal moral decency, while liberals portray it as morally neutral. I argue that liberals face a dilemma: The maximalist position on abortion undermines the politically neutral case for expanding state support for pregnant women. I offer both utilitarian and autonomy-supporting reasons to prioritize the case for expanded state support
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Three Papers on Pregnancy and Motherhood
This dissertation explores metaphysical and ethical dimensions of pregnancy and motherhood. Chapter 1 concerns the metaphysics of pregnancy. I defend the containment view—the position that a fetus (1) is merely contained by its mother and (2) is an organism during pregnancy. I argue against the parthood view, which states that a fetus is a maternal part. I bring the personal identity literature—particularly animalism—to bear on the metaphysics of pregnancy literature. I deploy thought experiments modeled on classic remnant, fission, and transplant cases to demonstrate that the parthood view is incompatible with standard accounts of human organism persistence. By contrast, the containment view yields the right verdicts. Chapter 2 asks: What is wrong with violence? I explore an under-recognized aspect of violence: its moral significance for parents. For many parents, raising children is part of what gives meaning, structure, and shape to their lives and senses of self—it is a reproductive project. I offer an account of projects which explains their role in our moral lives, and I argue that we have an obligation not to undermine the projects of others without good reasons. Violence harms children and thereby undermines the reproductive projects which they are central to. Thus, violence fails our obligation to parents and is a pro tanto wrong in part for this reason. This is particularly salient to mothers who perform most reproductive work. Chapter 3 asks: Is it morally praiseworthy to carry out a pregnancy, rather than terminate? I argue yes. Pregnant women undertake significant costs for the benefit of their children and are thus prima facie praiseworthy. I hypothesize that this is under-recognized in part because of the dominance of maximalist liberal and conservative positions within the abortion debate. For reasons of political expediency, conservatives portray carrying 2 out a pregnancy as minimal moral decency, while liberals portray it as morally neutral. I argue that liberals face a dilemma: The maximalist position on abortion undermines the politically neutral case for expanding state support for pregnant women. I offer both utilitarian and autonomy-supporting reasons to prioritize the case for expanded state support
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
