1,721,098 research outputs found
Sparus aurata SLC6A19 (Slc6A19) mRNA, partial cds. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MF442261.1), GeneBank accession number: MF442261.1
No full text
Correction to: Well-Being and Territory: Methods and Strategies (Social Indicators Research, (2021), 10.1007/s11205-021-02645-3)
No full textUnfortunately, the following articles were by mistake included in other issues but are part of the Special Issue on Well-Being and Territory: Methods and Strategies “Tomaselli, V., Giuffrida, G., Gozzo, S. et al. Building Decision-making indicators Through Network Analysis of Big Data. Soc Indic Res 151, 33–49 (2020). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11205- 020- 02363-2 “Crocetta, C., Antonucci, L., Cataldo, R. eta al. Higher-Order PLS-PM Approach for Different Types of Constructs. Soc Indic Res 154, 725–754 (2021). https:// doi. org/ artic le/ 10. 1007/ s11205- 020- 02563-w “Greco, F., Polli, A. Security Perception and People Well-being. Soc Indic Res 153, 741–758 (2021). https:// doi. org/ artic le/ 10. 1007/ s11205- 020- 02341-8 “Riniolo, V., Ortensi, L.E. Young Generations’ Activism in Italy: Comparing Political Engagement and Participation of Native Youths and Youths from a Migrant Background. Soc Indic Res 153, 923–955 (2021). https:// doi. org/ artic le/ 10. 1007/ s11205- 020- 02487-5 An article note was included in the original version of the Editorial article stating the above information. The original article has been corrected
Oncorhynchus mykiss SLC6A19 (Slc6A19) mRNA, partial cds (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MF442260.1), GeneBank accession number: MF442260.1
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
