1,721,085 research outputs found
MSO912789 Supplemental Material2 - Supplemental material for Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis: A multicentre prospective cohort analysis of the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative national clinical dataset for rehabilitation centres in England
Supplemental material, MSO912789 Supplemental Material2 for Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis: A multicentre prospective cohort analysis of the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative national clinical dataset for rehabilitation centres in England by Lynne Turner-Stokes Richard Harding, Peihan Yu, Mendwas Dzingina and Wei Gao in Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical</p
MSO912789 Supplemental Material1 - Supplemental material for Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis: A multicentre prospective cohort analysis of the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative national clinical dataset for rehabilitation centres in England
Supplemental material, MSO912789 Supplemental Material1 for Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis: A multicentre prospective cohort analysis of the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative national clinical dataset for rehabilitation centres in England by Lynne Turner-Stokes Richard Harding, Peihan Yu, Mendwas Dzingina and Wei Gao in Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical</p
sj-pdf-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163221105564 – Supplemental material for ‘It’s not just all about the fancy words and the adults’: Recommendations for practice from a qualitative interview study with children and young people with a parent with a life-limiting illness
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163221105564 for ‘It’s not just all about the fancy words and the adults’: Recommendations for practice from a qualitative interview study with children and young people with a parent with a life-limiting illness by Steve Marshall, Rachel Fearnley, Katherine Bristowe and Richard Harding in Palliative Medicine</p
Supplementary_materials_Table_S1._Search_strategy_developed_using_PICOS_framework_by_CL_in_Palliative_Medicine – Supplemental material for The conceptual models and mechanisms of action that underpin advance care planning for cancer patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Supplemental material, Supplementary_materials_Table_S1._Search_strategy_developed_using_PICOS_framework_by_CL_in_Palliative_Medicine for The conceptual models and mechanisms of action that underpin advance care planning for cancer patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials by Cheng-Pei Lin, Catherine J Evans, Jonathan Koffman, Jo Armes, Fliss E M Murtagh and Richard Harding in Palliative Medicine</p
Supplementary_materials_Table_S2_Description_of_risk_of_bias_assessment_by_CL_in_Palliative_Medicine – Supplemental material for The conceptual models and mechanisms of action that underpin advance care planning for cancer patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Supplemental material, Supplementary_materials_Table_S2_Description_of_risk_of_bias_assessment_by_CL_in_Palliative_Medicine for The conceptual models and mechanisms of action that underpin advance care planning for cancer patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials by Cheng-Pei Lin, Catherine J Evans, Jonathan Koffman, Jo Armes, Fliss E M Murtagh and Richard Harding in Palliative Medicine</p
sj-docx-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163241248324 – Supplemental material for Primary palliative care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the evidence for models and outcomes
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163241248324 for Primary palliative care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the evidence for models and outcomes by Anna Peeler, Oladayo Afolabi, Michael Adcock, Catherine Evans, Kennedy Nkhoma, Dorothee van Breevoort, Lindsay Farrant and Richard Harding in Palliative Medicine</p
040419_Supplementary_materials – Supplemental material for What influences patients’ decisions regarding palliative care in advance care planning discussions? Perspectives from a qualitative study conducted with advanced cancer patients, families and healthcare professionals
Supplemental material, 040419_Supplementary_materials for What influences patients’ decisions regarding palliative care in advance care planning discussions? Perspectives from a qualitative study conducted with advanced cancer patients, families and healthcare professionals by Cheng-Pei Lin, Catherine J Evans, Jonathan Koffman, Shuh-Jen Sheu, Su-Hsuan Hsu and Richard Harding in Palliative Medicine</p
Supplementary_materials_Figure_S1_Example_search_strategy_(MEDLINE)_by_CL_in_Palliative_Medicine – Supplemental material for The conceptual models and mechanisms of action that underpin advance care planning for cancer patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Supplemental material, Supplementary_materials_Figure_S1_Example_search_strategy_(MEDLINE)_by_CL_in_Palliative_Medicine for The conceptual models and mechanisms of action that underpin advance care planning for cancer patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials by Cheng-Pei Lin, Catherine J Evans, Jonathan Koffman, Jo Armes, Fliss E M Murtagh and Richard Harding in Palliative Medicine</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
