1,557 research outputs found
FIGURE 2 in How Fast Could Tyrannosaurus rex Run?
No full textFIGURE 2. ESTIMATED EXTENSOR MUSCLE MASS per leg needed to run fast, as a fraction of total body mass. Larger animals need relatively more leg muscle to run. This dependence is illustrated by the solid line, calculated for a chicken scaled up to the size of T. rex. For several models of T. rex anatomy, the estimates (red) all require more leg muscle for running fast than the creature was likely to have had (orange dot). (Adapted from ref. 6.)Published as part of Richard Fitzgerald, 2002, How Fast Could Tyrannosaurus rex Run?, pp. 18-19 in Physics Today 55 on page 19, DOI: 10.1063/1.1480769, http://zenodo.org/record/373249
FIGURE 1 in How Fast Could Tyrannosaurus rex Run?
No full textFIGURE 1. IN A FREE-BODY DIAGRAM for a running tyrannosaur, the angles of the leg joints (top) are critical parameters. In addi- tion to the forces and torques produced by leg muscles, external forces (bottom) including the weights of the body (Ƒb), thigh (Ƒt), shank (Ƒs), and metatarsus (Ƒm), as well as the ground reaction force (GRF) that acts a distance R from the toe joint must be incorporated. (Adapted from ref. 6.)Published as part of Richard Fitzgerald, 2002, How Fast Could Tyrannosaurus rex Run?, pp. 18-19 in Physics Today 55 on page 18, DOI: 10.1063/1.1480769, http://zenodo.org/record/373249
Run?
No full textRichard Fitzgerald (2002): How Fast Could Tyrannosaurus rex Run? Physics Today 55: 18-19, DOI: 10.1063/1.148076
A Relational Theory of Authorship
No full textOver the years we have heard the debate as to whether authorship emanates solely from the individual or from the cultural context in which they inhabit. Writers such as Professors Woodmansee, Jaszi and Cohen have asserted a cultural theory of authorship. On one hand, there is the liberal philosophy of autonomous creativity evidenced in the notion of a "romantic author" (after the period known as romanticism). On the other hand we have more of a communitarian notion – that the author acts in a cultural context and authorship to some extent must be linked back to the social existence within which the author is situated.\ud
\ud
This article argues that for too long we have privileged the notion of the romantic author so much so that it is hard to argue for any other approach to copyright than one that focuses primarily on the author and their assignees such as publishers or associated commercialising agents such as recording companies. Furthermore it suggests that this approach fits awkwardly with the burgeoning networked society fuelled by the Internet to the point where it threatens innovation and the potential for productivity. To this end the article argues that we should more explicitly acknowledge the contribution of culture to authorship and more so the role of each and every individual in assisting and nurturing that authorship, as well as the contribution of users to creativity through consumptive, productive and transformative use of copyright works
Tyrannosaurus rex Osborn 1905
No full text• A new biomechanics model finds that T. rex lacked large enough leg muscles to run fast. From Saturday-morning television shows to Hollywood blockbusters, dinosaurs are perennial favorites for inspiring people’s curiosity. And top- ping the fascination list is usually Tyrannosaurus rex, the six-ton giant that reigned over the Upper Cretaceous Period 65 million years ago, moving around on hind legs more than 2.5 meters long and devouring less fortunate creatures with its powerful jaws. Although the fossil record provides clues about some aspects of dinosaur existence, insights into many others must be tortuously teased out of uncov- ered bones and footprints. Many questions lack direct answers. For example, how fast could dinosaurs move? That question has proved easier to answer for smaller dinosaurs, whose fossilized footprints contain speed information. In the mid1970s, McNeill Alexander (Uni- versity of Leeds) derived a method for estimating speed from the ratio of the stride length to the leg length (which can be determined from recovered bones or estimated from the footprint size). 1 So-called trackways containing stride records have provided evidence for running (having a suspend- ed, aerial phase) for many bipedal dinosaurs. No trackway evidence of running by larger animals such as T. rex has been found, which is not unexpected. It’s rare to find fossil beds large enough to span the stride of a running T. rex. In addition, most creatures spend much more time walking than running, so any running trackways are rare. Most estimates of the speed of Tyrannosaurus and other large dinosaurs have instead come from various comparisons to other vertebrates. Noting the similarity of T. rex skeletal anatomy to that of extant birds and other fast runners, Gregory Paul and Robert Bakker have suggested that T. rex would have been able to run at least 20 m/s (45 mph). 2 Applying more physics-based arguments, others have proposed slower maximum speeds. Based on the maximum transverse forces that T. rex bones could have withstood, Alexander has argued that it was capable of a modest run at best. 3 Per Christiansen (University of Copenhagen), quantifing such arguments, estimated that T. rex could walk at 10 m/s (22 mph)—still far from slow. 4 James Farlow (Indiana–Purdue University) and colleagues 5 have suggested that a fast-running T. rex would have experienced fatally large forces if it had tripped, so they concluded it likely moved no faster than 10 m/s. Working at the University of California, Berkeley, John Hutchinson (now at Stanford University) and Mariano Garcia (now at Borg Warner Automotive in New York) recently offered a new approach for analyzing possible speeds of T. rex and other bipeds, based on a biomechanical model for determining the minimum mass of leg extensor muscle required for an animal to run. 6 With this model, the pair found that T. rex could not have had strong enough legs to be a fast runner. Scaling muscles Underlying this new model is the observation that muscles in vertebrate animals generate remarkably uniform maximum force per unit cross section, about 300 kN/m2. Given that evolution has conserved this muscle property, Hutchinson and Garcia argue it’s reasonable to assume that the muscles of dinosaurs such as T. rex had similar force-generating capability. One consequence of this uniformity is that muscle strength increases more slowly than muscle mass as body size increases, as roughly the 2 / power rather than linearly. 3 Thus, as body size increases, the muscle mass needed to support and move it increases even faster. This scaling dif- ference, well-known for decades, is at the core of the researchers’ conclusion that T. rex was not a fast runner. Hutchinson and Garcia use a two-dimensional free-body diagram to determine the min- imum muscle mass per leg that’s needed at midstride to maintain quasistatic equilibrium, factoring in the forces and torques from various muscles, limb segment weights, and the ground (see figure 1). At the midpoint of the running stride, the body is at its lowest point, accelerating upward. The necessary upward force comes from the ground. For extant bipeds at a fast run, this ground reaction force (GRF) is about 2.5 times the body weight, relatively inde- pendent of species or mass. Hutchinson and Garcia therefore adopted this relation for their calculations. To translate this GRF into a forward velocity, the researchers applied the notion of dynamic similarity. Originally proposed by Alexander, 3 this concept considers the ratio between an animal’s kinetic and potential energy as expressed in the Froude number, Fr = Ʋ 2/ gh, where Ʋ is the forward velocity, g the acceleration due to gravity, and h the hip height. Animals moving with the same Froude number should have similar gaits and exert similar relative forces. A fastrunning ostrich experiences a GRF of 2.7 times its body weight at Fr = 16; a T. rex with a similar relative GRF should have a similar Froude number, which corresponds to about 20 m/s—in line with the faster speed estimates. - . kg Hutchinson and Garcia tested their running model with living species: a chicken (a fast runner) and an alligator (unable to run on two legs). The model predicted that a chicken must have at least 5% of its body weight as extensor muscles in each leg to run fast, almost a factor of two below the actual fraction of 9%. But for an alligator to run on its hind legs, the model predicted it would have to have a leg muscle fraction of 8%, and indeed alligators have much less than that. Thus in both cases, the model gave results consistent with observations. For chickens and alligators, both distant relatives of extinct dinosaurs, the anatomical details the model required—joint angles, limb lengths, and weight distribution—were available from dissection. But for dinosaurs, only limb lengths are readily available from fossils. Weights can be estimated with various methods such as scaling, and by normalizing variables to total body mass, the researchers could reduce the effects of weight uncertainty. That left posture as the largest unknown. In what Andrew Biewener (Harvard University) calls a nice quanti- tative addition to their study, Hutchinson and Garcia examined various values for T. rex ’s posture parameters, thereby getting a sense of the model’s sensitivity and uncertainty. The results for the different sets of values are shown as the solid red circles in figure 2. The color bands of figure 2 follow from anatomical constraints and current knowledge of living animals. Having a leg muscle mass greater than 50% of the total body mass is impossible, because then the two legs combined would be more massive than the whole. For consistency with extant vertebrates, which have a total muscle mass that’s half their total body mass or less, the researchers also rule out running when the required leg muscle mass fraction is more than 25%. For required fractional muscle masses below 25%, running ability depends on the actual leg muscle mass, as for the alligator. Empirically, the most agile running bipeds don’t require more than 5% of their body weight to be leg extensor muscle. “Despite fairly generous assumptions,” says Garcia, “muscle masses would need to be unreasonably high for T. rex to be a fast runner.” Even with the most favorable posture parameters, the researchers report that required extensor muscle is larger than the actual muscle mass of 7–10% they estimate based on scaling models. Given the extensive unknowns, the pair hesitate to put a specific upper bound on the maximum speed of T. rex. “Speeds of 11 m/s [25 mph] would be pushing it,” says Hutchinson, “but 20 m/s [45 mph] is not reasonable.” This work hasn’t settled the debate over T. rex speed. Hutchinson is working on applying the model to other, larger living animals such as ostriches and rhinoceroses to test the conclusions, something many critics are eager to see.Published as part of Richard Fitzgerald, 2002, How Fast Could Tyrannosaurus rex Run?, pp. 18-19 in Physics Today 55 on pages 18-19, DOI: 10.1063/1.1480769, http://zenodo.org/record/373249
How far is F. Scott Fitzgerald efficient in reflecting the moral corruption in the American Society of Roaring Twenties?
Get PDFF. Scott Fitzgerald is one of the artistic authors in American literature who has always
inspired young generations ever since he was first published. The very first reason why his
masterpieces are so impressive, is his flashing some sections from his real life in his short
stories and novels. Furthermore, he is shining at reflecting the characteristics of his period-the
glittering Jazz Era, the sophisticated, stylish Roaring Twenties.
There are many sections of Fitzgerald’s life, which is very similar to his novel The Great
Gatsby. To give some examples, Gatsby falls in love while he is a lieutenant like Fitzgerald
and Daisy is keen on a wealthy life, full of luxury just like Zelda who is Fitzgerald’s wife in
real life. Nick Carraway has also some similar aspects with Fitzgerald. They both go to Ivy
League colleges (Nick goes to Yale and Fitzgerald goes to Princeton.). The real life of the
author, embedded in the story, always makes the novel more alluring. That is why I chose The
Great Gatsby.
This extended essay is mainly an attempt to figure out the social attitudes during twenties and
grasp the mood of this enigmatic Jazz Age by enjoying the masterpiece of one of the most
transcendent, peerless American authors-F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby.
Moral corruption is the main issue that is covered in this essay and the efficiency of Fitzgerald
in reflecting the collapse of ethical values is focused on
Outline of Fictional Appropriations of F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald
Get PDFThe aim of this paper is to chronologically and thematically outline the existing novels combining fact and fiction, termed bioficitons/literary biographies about the lives of the American author Francis Scott Fitzgerald and his wife Zelda Fitzgerald. The list could further serve the study of this genre and the trends of its popularity. Furthermore, it can lead to the study the Fitzgeralds’ fictional portrayal
OUTLINE OF FICTIONAL APPROPRIATIONS OF F. SCOTT AND ZELDA FITZGERALD
No full textThe aim of this paper is to chronologically and thematically outline the existingnovels combining fact and fiction, termed bioficitons/literary biographies about the lives of theAmerican author Francis Scott Fitzgerald and his wife Zelda Fitzgerald. The list could further serve thestudy of this genre and the trends of its popularity. Furthermore, it can lead to the study the Fitzgeralds’fictional portrayal
“The Three Kings: Hemingway, Faulkner, and Fitzgerald”
No full textIn this chapter, the author reflects on how he came to read William Faulkner, Ernest Hemingway, and F. Scott Fitzgerald—whom he describes as the three kings. The author begins by recalling a few years ago reading in Exile's Return, Malcolm Cowley's book on the 1920s, the teenage correspondence between Cowley and Kenneth Burke. He admits that reading was his very problem in Mississippi. He also remembers the first time he read Fitzgerald's story “Absolution” and how he came to know who Faulkner was. According to the author, 1962 was the year he would first read Faulkner, Fitzgerald, and Hemingway. He read The Sun Also Rises, Absalom, Absalom!, and The Great Gatsby. He argues that Faulkner was the best of all three, and the very best of any American writing fiction this century. He concludes by discussing what he and his generation might have learned from the three writers.</p
- …
