197,358 research outputs found
Letter with attachment: Francis X. Reuss to Ida M. Tarbell, April 14, 1896
No full textHandwritten letter, 2 pages, with hand copy of statement of F.N. Blanchet regarding the observance of Lincoln's deat
Richard Reuss (interview)
No full textThis interview is included in the Indiana University Folklore Institute, 1987 Collection at the Indiana University Center for the Study of History and Memory. In this interview, Richard Reuss discusses his involvement with the Indiana University Folklore Institute. He originally became interested in folklore through the folksong revival and decided to attend IU in the mid nineteen-sixties to earn a PhD. Reuss discusses the solidarity of the student body. He talks about various graduate assistantships that were available to students at the time. Reuss spends most of the interview discussing his interactions with and impressions of Stith Thompson and Richard Dorson. Reuss feels that Thompson left a 'long shadow' for Dorson to come out of. He cites Dorson's motivation as one of the reasons that the Folklore Institute is well-known. Reuss discusses the 'four Ps' of promoting a new academic discipline: performance, publish, propaganda and power. He then relates the four Ps to the steps Dorson took to promote the study of folklore. Finally Reuss reflects on Dorson's influence on his own studies in folklore and tells a few anecdotes that characterize Dorson's personality. This collection is part of the Indiana University Folklore Institute, 1987 collection which is available at the Indiana University Center for the Study of History and Memory. It consists of: 55 pages, 2 cassettes (1 7/8 ips, 1 hour 44 minutes), and an index . This collection is closed until 2015 except to authorized project personnel. The IU Folklore Institute, 1987 collection deals with the beginning, the building, and the growth of the Indiana University (IU) Folklore Institute into an internationally recognized program. The interviewees are mostly students and/or faculty of the folklore program from the 1940s to the 1980s. They discuss those who most influenced and impacted the institute, namely Stith Thompson and Richard M. Dorson. They share their memories and experiences of the time they spent, or continue to spend, in the IU Folklore Institute
Richard Dorson (interview)
No full textThis interview is included in the American Folklore Society Oral History Project held at the Archive of Folk Culture, American Folklife Center, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. In this item, Richard M. Dorson is interviewed by Richard Reuss at the American Folklore Society annual meeting in Nashville, Tennessee for the American Folklore Society Oral History Project. Biography/History note: Richard M. Dorson, folklorist, author, and educator, was born in New York City in 1916 and died in 1981. He earned his B.A., M.A. and Ph.D. at Harvard University and taught at Harvard and Michigan State University before becoming professor of history and folklore at Indiana University where he founded its Folklore Institute in 1963 and became the first director and first chair of the Folklore Department at Indiana University in 1978. This collection consists of 1 sound tape reel (40 min.) : analog, 7 1/2 ips, 2 track, mono. ; 7 in. It was originally recorded on November 2, 1973 at the American Folklore Society annual meeting in Nashville, Tennessee by Richard Reuss on a Sony audiocassette. This is a first-generation copy
Megamyrmaekion Reuss 1834
No full textMegamyrmaekion Reuss, 1834 Type species. Megamyrmaekion caudatum Reuss, 1834, by monotypy.Published as part of Sankaran, Pradeep M. & Caleb, John T. D., 2021, On the taxonomic validity of Indian ground spiders: V. Genera Megamyrmaekion Reuss, 1834, Sosticus Chamberlin, 1922 and Gaviphosa gen. nov. (Araneae: Gnaphosidae), pp. 539-564 in Zootaxa 5040 (4) on page 544, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5040.4.5, http://zenodo.org/record/553175
Polystomella minuta Reuss 1865
No full text<i>Polystomella minuta</i> Reuss, 1865 <p> <i>Polystomella minuta</i> Reuss, 1865: 478, pl. 4, fig. 6a-b.</p> <p> <i>Elphidium minutum</i> – Cushman 1939: 40, pl. 10, fig. 22 (Reuss figure), <i>non</i> figs 23-25 (the figure of Cushman is the one from Reuss).</p> <p>ORIGINAL DIAGNOSIS. — “Klein (0.45-0.5 Millim.), rund, wenig zusammengedrückt, mit sehr stumpfwinkeligem Rücken, ohne Nabel und Nabelscheibe. Zehn schmale, sehr wenig gebogene Kammern mit schwach vertieften linearen Nähten und sehr kleinen, wenig zahlreichen, punktförmigen Nathgrübchen. Die Septalfläche halbmondförmig, breiter als hoch, ohne sichtbare Mündungen”.</p> <p>AGE. — Upper Oligocene.</p> <p>TYPE LOCALITY. — No type locality is given, but three localities are pointed out: Harleshausen, Dieckolzen and Bodenburg, situated south of Hannover.</p> <p>OCCURRENCE. — Very rare.</p> <p> STRATIGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION. — <i>Fide</i> Reuss (1865), Upper Oligocene.</p> <p>REMARKS</p> <p>The figures of Le Calvez (1966, 1970) are inspired by the specimen of the collection on the Parisian Basin. Her figure published in 1966, which unfortunately is a drawing, appears to be identical to the picture published in 1970. The main difference with Reuss species is the presence of numerous pustules on the test. These pustules are not mentioned by Reuss in his description of the species.</p> <p>Dr F. Rögl believes that the Le Calvez species is not the one of Reuss (message to AP 2014).</p> <p> <i>Elphidiella minuta</i> is quoted by Reiser (1987: 93) in the Oligocene and noteworthy in the Bavarian Chattian where it would be not rare. Unfortunately, it is not figured and the author only gives the Reuss reference. As for Miocene references, they probably always concern <i>Polystomella falunica</i>.</p> <p> Finally, many of all the illustrations since 1974 of the Oligocene “ <i>Polystomella minuta</i> ” correspond to other species, perhaps pro parte to, <i>Polystomella latidorsata</i> Reuss, 1864.</p> <p>Asides from the Ellis & Messina catalogue (1940 and supplements), only two references (Hosius 1895; Beutler 1914) are given with the number of pages but no indication of illustrations.</p> <p>In 1997, one of us (AP) evoked the problem of mixing both species.</p> <p> To conclude, we think that now it’s impossible to give a description of <i>Polystomella minuta</i>, it would be necessary to examine samples from the Reuss localities to obtain topotypic specimens.</p>Published as part of <i>Margerel, Jean-Pierre & Poignant, Armelle, 2018, Two poorly known species of Foraminifera: Polystomella minuta Reuss, 1865 from the Oligocene of Germany (Bavaria) and P. falunica Allix, 1913 from the Miocene of western France (Touraine). Designation of a neotype for P. falunica, pp. 497-504 in Geodiversitas 40 (19)</i> on page 498, DOI: 10.5252/geodiversitas2018v40a19, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5745599">http://zenodo.org/record/5745599</a>
Agathelia asperella , Reuss 1854
No full textAgathelia asperella Reuss, 1854 Pl. 21, fig. 3 v*1854 Agathelia asperella m: Reuss, p. 82, pl. 9, figs 10–12 (topotypes and neotype studied). v1903 a Agathelia asperella Reuss 1854: Felix, p. 262, text-figs 30, 32. 1926 Agathelia urgonica n. sp.: Dietrich, p. 75, pl. 5, fig. 1, pl. 8, fig. 2. 1937a Agathelia asperella Reuss 1854: Bataller, p. 141. v1975 Agathelia asperella Reuss: Beauvais & Beauvais, p. 567, text-fig. 1, fig. 2, text-fig. 2, figs 1, 2. 1987 Agathelia asperella Reuss, 1854: Kuzmicheva, p. 81, pl. II, fig. 1. v1982 Agathelia asperella Reuss 1854: Beauvais, vol 1, p. 44, pl. 61, fig. 7, pl. 62, figs 1, 2. v1992 Agathelia asperella Reuss, 1854: Eliàšovà, p. 405, pl. 6, fig. 1. 1994 Agathelia asperella Reuss: Liao & Xia, p. 69, pl. 5, text-figs 43a–c. v1997 Agathelia asperella Reuss, 1854: Baron-Szabo, p. 35, pl. 1, figs 1, 3, 5 (older synonyms cited therein). 2002 Agathelia asperella, Reuss 1854: Löser et al, p. 67. v2000 Agathelia asperella Reuss, 1854: Baron-Szabo, p. 108, pl. 4, fig. 4. v2002 Agathelia asperella Reuss, 1854: Baron-Szabo, p. 187, pl. 129, figs 3–5, pl. 130, figs 1–5. 2003 Agathelia asperella Reuss 1854: Götz, p. 5ff., pl. 1, fig. 3. v2003 Agathelia asperella Reuss, 1854: Baron-Szabo, p. 118, pl. 3, figs 2, 5, 6, pl. 4, figs 2, 7, 8. v2004 Agathelia asperella Reuss: Moosleitner, p. 174, 179, and 185, pl. 72, fig. 2, pl. 77, figs 2, 3, pl. 83, figs 1, 3. Dimensions. d=3.5– 6 mm; d (juvenile)=1.5–2.5 mm; dl=2.5–4.5 mm; c-c=3–5.5 mm, in areas of intense budding distance is 2.5 mm; s=24–48 +s5; s (juvenile)=16–22. Description. Massive, plocoid colony; calices often projecting, subcircular or elliptical in outline; costosepta arranged in 3 to 4 cycles in 6 systems; in some calices the beginning of a fifth cycle is present; S1 and S2 nearly equal in length and thickness, slightly alternating, extending to corallite centre; inner ends of S3 or S4 cuneiform or stretch out forming auriculae; columella lamellar to irregularly trabecular; wall is septothecal, in places parathecal. Remarks. Some authors have merged the species Stylina turbinata Trautschold, 1886, from the Hauterivian of Ukraine, which was transferred to the genus Agathelia Reuss by Bendukidze (1961), with the species Agathelia asperella Reuss. While the form Stylina turbinata Trautschold shows close resemblance to the genus Agathelia Reuss, its specific characteristics clearly differ from A. asperella Reuss. According to the original description and illustration by Trautschold (1886, p. 124, pl. III, figs 1a–b), the form A. turbinata is characterized by a corallite diameter ranging from 5–6 mm and 24 septa, which seem to be arranged in 12 systems. In addition, in some corallites the number of septa appears to be distinctly smaller (ranging around 12). In A. asperella the septa are arranged in 6 systems and even in the most juvenile corallites the number of septa is larger than 12. Moreover, in corallites that are 5–6 mm in diameter the number of septa is often twice as large as in A. turbinata. Therefore, the latter species is excluded from the synonymy of A. asperella Reuss. Type locality of species. Santonian of Austria (Gosau Group at Neffgraben). Distribution. Berriasian-Valanginian of Tibet, Valanginian-Hauterivian of Crimea, Lower Aptian of Tanzania, Albian-Cenomanian of Tibet, Upper Cretaceous of Slovakia, Upper Cenomanian-Lower Turonian of the Czech Republic, (?Upper Turonian-) Lower Coniacian-Campanian of Austria (Gosau Group), Santonian of Armenia, Upper Santonian of Germany, Campanian-Maastrichtian of Spain, Middle-Upper Maastrichtian of the UAE / Oman border region.Published as part of Baron-Szabo, Rosemarie C., 2008, Dendrophylliina, Caryophylliina, Fungiina, Microsolenina, and Stylinina, pp. 1-244 in Zootaxa 1952 on pages 200-20
Brachyphyllia depressa , Reuss 1854
No full text<i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i> Reuss, 1854 <p>Pl. 20, fig. 1</p> <p> v*1854 <i>Brachyphyllia depressa m.</i>: Reuss, p. 103, pl. 2, figs 8–10 (topotypes studied).</p> <p> 1857 <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i>: Milne Edwards, vol. 2, p. 480.</p> <p> 1858–61 <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i>: de Fromentel, p. 209.</p> <p> 1886 <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i>: de Fromentel, p. 578, pl. 168, figs 1–1b.</p> <p> v1903 a <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i> Reuss: Felix, p. 259.</p> <p> 1914 <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i> Reuss 1854: Felix, pars 7, p. 169.</p> <p> v1930 a <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i> Reuss: Oppenheim, p. 339 (topotypes studied).</p> <p> 1943 <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i> Reuss: Vaughan & Wells, pl. 11, figs 1–1a.</p> <p> 1956 <i>Brachyphyllia.</i> <i>depressa</i> Reuss: Wells, p. F. 381, figs 271.2a and 271.2b.</p> <p> v1982 <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i> Reuss 1854: Beauvais, vol. 2, p. 225, pl. 43, figs 8a–b (topotypes studied).</p> <p> 1987 <i>Brachyphyllia maxima</i> (Umbgrove, 1925): Meyer, p. 25, pl. 4, fig. 7.</p> <p> (v)1995 <i>Neocoeniopsis thraciensis</i> sp. n.: Tchéchmédjiéva, p. 65, pl. 15, fig. 1.</p> <p> <i>2000</i> <i>Brachyphyllia depressa,</i> Reuss 1854: Löser, p. 16.</p> <p> v2002 <i>Brachyphyllia depressa</i> Reuss, 1854: Baron-Szabo, p. 153, pl. 115, fig. 1.</p>Published as part of <i>Baron-Szabo, Rosemarie C., 2008, Dendrophylliina, Caryophylliina, Fungiina, Microsolenina, and Stylinina, pp. 1-244 in Zootaxa 1952</i> on page 19
Roland Reuss, "Wo aber Gefahr ist, wächst / Das Rettende auch […]". Philologie als Rettung, Frankfurt a. M./Basel 2016 [Rez.]
No full textRiechers H-C. Roland Reuss, "Wo aber Gefahr ist, wächst / Das Rettende auch […]". Philologie als Rettung, Frankfurt a. M./Basel 2016 [Rez.]. Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur (ZfdA). 2017;146(3):402–403
COMPARATIVE-STUDY ON RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MYCELIAL BROTH IN FILAMENTOUS AND PELLETED FORMS
No full text
- …
